To: Nervous Tick
The rankings all year long are based on prettier wins except for the last game. Why should Texas deserve it more than TCU, Boise State or even Cincinnati?
82 posted on
12/06/2009 5:38:44 PM PST by
tobyhill
To: tobyhill
You’re not grasping the concept here.
84 posted on
12/06/2009 5:41:10 PM PST by
Nervous Tick
(Stop dissing drunken sailors! At least they spend their OWN money.)
To: tobyhill
That’s why my idea is that in the following regular season, every BCS team has to play two games against other BCS teams. Now it’s not perfect, in that from year-to-year, teams will drop off due to graduation, but in the absence of a playoff, it will provide a way for good teams to play each other.
86 posted on
12/06/2009 5:42:31 PM PST by
dfwgator
To: tobyhill
The rankings all year long are based on prettier wins except for the last game. Why should Texas deserve it more than TCU, Boise State or even Cincinnati? Perhaps because TCU didn't play any good teams?
87 posted on
12/06/2009 5:43:16 PM PST by
ColdWater
("The theory of evolution really has no bearing on what I'm trying to accomplish with FR anyway. ")
To: tobyhill
Why should Texas deserve it more than TCU, Boise State or even Cincinnati? They don't. That's why I favor and eight-team playoff where all of it could be settled on the field. If my plan was in place, we would have this entree on December 19: 9) Georgia Tech at 1) Alabama 8) Ohio State at 2) Texas 7) Oregon at 3) Cincinnati 6) Boise St. at 4) TCU Semifinals would part of the New Years bowls and the Chamiponship Game would be in mid-January. (If you're wondering where Florida is in the playoff - they're out because didn't win their conference. The rest did and that's the key to qualifying for the playoff).
151 posted on
12/07/2009 9:50:30 AM PST by
OrangeHoof
("Barack Obama" is Swahili for "Bend over suckahs".)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson