Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Palin expands her position on Illegal Immigration
RustyHumphries show ^ | 12/04/09 | unseen

Posted on 12/03/2009 7:57:25 PM PST by unseen

Sarah Palin made her position on illegal immigration known tonight in an radio interview with Rusty Humphries show. At the 11.00min mark in the interview Gov Palin states that we need to close the Southern border. She said that they are called illegal for a reason and if they can not follow the rules they do not need to be in this country.

(Excerpt) Read more at ustream.tv ...


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Foreign Affairs; Front Page News; Government; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: aliens; illegal; illegals; immigrantlist; immigration; military; obama; palin; pds; politics; sarahpalin; veterans
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 101-120121-140141-160161-178 next last
To: sten

Bullhockey.


121 posted on 12/04/2009 12:27:43 PM PST by EternalVigilance (The Supreme Law of the Land: "No person shall be deprived of life without due process of law.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 113 | View Replies]

To: FTJM

The Path to Citizenship could just as easily mean, Go Back where you came from, apply like everyone else and then you will be on the Path to citizenship. Just because that phrase means one thing to one person doesn’t mean it means the same thing to her. Quit straining at gnats.


122 posted on 12/04/2009 12:39:16 PM PST by Lyantana (A Southern View)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: EternalVigilance

well thought out response

i believe the ‘rogue’ nickname came from the mccain camp as she started to buck against mccain’s policies (rightly so).

as everyone knows, everyone must stay on message with the top of the ticket. unfortunately, the message was to lose the election, not actually win it... which someone forgot to tell Sarah.


123 posted on 12/04/2009 12:44:09 PM PST by sten
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 121 | View Replies]

To: Deb

I just want to make Both the Government and Business responsible for knowingly hiring illegals. And kick the illegals out. Just sealing the border is a half-assed solution. There are a lot of Meat Packing plants int he midwest who KNOWINGLY hire illegals, should they get a free pass on KNOWINGLY hiring illegals?

It takes a full on solution, even some threats to the Politicians in Mexico City and Washington DC to get it solved. The problem is a breakdown in Government and lax enforcement on laws already on the book. Now if a Business hire someone with fake credentials i don’t think the business should be penalized, but if hire them and they have a clearly obviously FAKE documentation or NO documentation, then they need to be fined or their HR dept needs to have some people fired in it.

Not all businesses are bad and not all are good, but the ones that knowingly hire illegals need their asses frosted for doing so. BECAUSE IT IS ILLEGAL!!!!


124 posted on 12/04/2009 12:52:18 PM PST by GraceG
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 120 | View Replies]

To: Lyantana
The Path to Citizenship could just as easily mean, Go Back where you came from, apply like everyone else and then you will be on the Path to citizenship. Just because that phrase means one thing to one person doesn’t mean it means the same thing to her. Quit straining at gnats.

And black could mean white, and water could mean fire.

125 posted on 12/04/2009 12:56:24 PM PST by FTJM
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 122 | View Replies]

To: Jeff Head
Hey Jeff...why is she having to take "a much larger step in the right direction than what we have heard before"?

Couldn't you or I summarize our immigration policy thoughts in 3 sentences, probably right off the top of our heads, leaving absolutely no question on our position? Why can't she do the same???
126 posted on 12/04/2009 12:59:09 PM PST by magritte ("I will give this monkey for lunch to Mr Sata,")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 93 | View Replies]

To: magritte
That is a good point. I believe when she was running with McCain that she was constrained by his policy, while being on his ticket. This is the first time I have heard her asked the question straight-up in a national interview and she responded with this statement.
127 posted on 12/04/2009 2:48:04 PM PST by Jeff Head (Freedom is not free...never has been, never will be. (www.dragonsfuryseries.com))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 126 | View Replies]

To: ansel12

Thank you for post #38!!!


128 posted on 12/04/2009 2:56:30 PM PST by Extremely Extreme Extremist (10 YEARS OF FREEPING! HAPPY ANNIVERSARY EEE!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: Extremely Extreme Extremist

LOL, after bitching and moaning during several posts overnight, you finally thought that you came up with something witty.

If you like it so much why don’t you post it regularly so that people will know that you are a party hack that is here professionally, attacking possible conservative republican candidates that you are running against, in your role as a party chairman.

Since you like it, I guess I have your approval to post it frequently?


129 posted on 12/04/2009 3:04:09 PM PST by ansel12 (Scozzafava/Romney 2012)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 128 | View Replies]

To: unseen; rockabyebaby
Palin on Birth Certificate (8:00): "I thinks it's a fair question just like I think past associations and past voting record are fair game."

WOW!! Wayta go Sarah!!

Will FNC and other talk radio hosts FINALLY follow up??

So Glenn Beck, is Sarah now a nutty birther??

130 posted on 12/04/2009 3:29:18 PM PST by DTogo (High time to bring back the Sons of Liberty !!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ansel12
Uh...I think you have the wrong guy :-)
131 posted on 12/04/2009 3:33:06 PM PST by Extremely Extreme Extremist (10 YEARS OF FREEPING! HAPPY ANNIVERSARY EEE!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 129 | View Replies]

To: Extremely Extreme Extremist
HOLY COW, did I get that wrong.... see post 128

SORRY Extremely Extreme Extremist, I just walked by the computer and confused you with someone else, I bet that had you wondering for a minute or two.

Thanks, for the post and I think that we need to remind people of the fact in post 38 frequently until people realize who he is.

132 posted on 12/04/2009 3:48:46 PM PST by ansel12 (Scozzafava/Romney 2012)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 131 | View Replies]

To: ansel12
Thanks, for the post and I think that we need to remind people of the fact in post 38 frequently until people realize who he is.

I've been here for almost ten years now. The whole time I have posted openly and without any equivocation about who and what I am and what my agenda is. Most folks here know that. The ones that don't can easily click on my screen name to find out.

133 posted on 12/04/2009 4:27:46 PM PST by EternalVigilance (The Supreme Law of the Land: "No person shall be deprived of life without due process of law.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 132 | View Replies]

To: EternalVigilance
The whole time I have posted openly and without any equivocation about who and what I am and what my agenda is.

That isn't true, that is why I get such nice posts of thank you, on those rare occasions when I reveal who you really are as you work as a hidden fifth columnist.

"That post was by a Party Chairman representing Presidential candidate Alan Keyes, so take all of his posts as you would Howard Dean's or the Party Chairman of the Greens or the Libertarian Party.
In other words, the poster that uses the name EternalVigilance is currently the Party Chairman of Alan Keyes's personally created third party, and is determined to stop Governor Palin at all costs, from gaining the Republican nomination."

134 posted on 12/04/2009 4:56:54 PM PST by ansel12 (Scozzafava/Romney 2012)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 133 | View Replies]

To: Deb

I’ve been right here. But I have been lurking more than normal as I can’t read the news about Zero without almost having a stroke.

So, I tend to go off and play solitaire or something. I don’t think I’ve even listened to the talk shows much the last 3 or 4 days.


135 posted on 12/04/2009 4:58:19 PM PST by hattend (Who wants to be insured by Mutual of Obama?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 116 | View Replies]

To: ansel12

Stalking people from thread to thread and posting personal attacks on them is pretty pathetic, and generally frowned on on FR.


136 posted on 12/04/2009 5:13:30 PM PST by EternalVigilance (The Supreme Law of the Land: "No person shall be deprived of life without due process of law.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 134 | View Replies]

To: ansel12
That isn't true

Heck if it isn't. I've always posted here openly as myself, and made my agenda explicitly clear. My real name and my exact organizational affiliations are on my homepage for anyone on the planet with an internet connection to read.

137 posted on 12/04/2009 5:16:46 PM PST by EternalVigilance (The Supreme Law of the Land: "No person shall be deprived of life without due process of law.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 134 | View Replies]

To: EternalVigilance

I’m not staking you at all and I never have.

You may notice that I am on a lot of Palin threads if you search my history, I try to ignore you generally when you show up to perform your party duties but sometimes your posts are so far over the line that I have to respond.

It sure is bizarre to have an actual, active, Party Chairman here on FR stalking the Palin threads and trying to destroy her and think that none of us know who you are and might not occasionally mention that.

You are here on this very thread in your official capacity of chairman for a Presidential candidate, yet you want to attack his competition and the freerepublic favorite anonymously.


138 posted on 12/04/2009 5:21:55 PM PST by ansel12 (Scozzafava/Romney 2012)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 136 | View Replies]

To: ansel12

As usual, total BS.


139 posted on 12/04/2009 5:24:24 PM PST by EternalVigilance (" I don't care if you think the earth is melting, you can't have my liberty or my country!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 138 | View Replies]

To: EternalVigilance

So you are not a working, active, party chairman for a different political party than Palin’s and Reagan’s republican party?

You are not a party chairman for a man that is running for president, that would be running against Palin, if she runs?

I was under the impression that the poster that posts under the name EternalVigilance was exactly that, if I am confusing you with another freeper, then please tell me.


140 posted on 12/04/2009 5:31:10 PM PST by ansel12 (Scozzafava/Romney 2012)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 139 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 101-120121-140141-160161-178 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson