Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Dan Walters: Air board's cover-up casts pall on diesel rules
Sacramento Bee ^ | 12/2/9 | Dan Walters

Posted on 12/02/2009 7:36:25 AM PST by SmithL

A year ago, high officials of the California Air Resources Board learned that the author of a statistical study on diesel soot effects had falsified his academic credentials.

The CARB researcher, Hien Tran, acknowledged the deception and agreed to be demoted, but after his data were given another peer review, they remained the basis of highly controversial regulations that will cost owners of trucks, buses and other diesel-powered machinery millions of dollars to upgrade their engines. The Tran study concluded that diesel "particulate matter" was responsible for about 1,000 additional deaths each year.

Only recently, with the rules on the verge of final promulgation, did board officials formally acknowledge Tran's falsification, largely because one board member, Fresno cardiologist John Telles, did his own investigation and complained about an apparent cover-up.

Telles, in sharp letters to board officials and during last month's CARB meeting, said the chain of events casts a pall over the legitimacy of the vote to proceed with the new rules.

"Failure to reveal this information to the board prior to the vote not only casts doubt on the legitimacy of the truck rule, but also upon the legitimacy of CARB itself," Telles said, adding, however, that he doesn't question the validity of the science.

(Excerpt) Read more at sacbee.com ...


TOPICS: Editorial; Front Page News; Government; Politics/Elections; US: California
KEYWORDS: carb; cultureofcorruption; diesel; energy; globalwarminghoax; goldenstate; gorebalism; pseudoscience; yourtaxdollarsatwork
"Failure to reveal this information to the board prior to the vote not only casts doubt on the legitimacy of the truck rule, but also upon the legitimacy of CARB itself,"
Not really, the whole purpose of CARB is to further a POLITICAL agenda, not a scientific one.
1 posted on 12/02/2009 7:36:26 AM PST by SmithL
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: SmithL
"A year ago, high officials of the California Air Resources Board learned that the author of a statistical study on diesel soot effects had falsified his academic credentials." The officials were high?
2 posted on 12/02/2009 7:40:03 AM PST by jessduntno (Take a minute and watch it: -> http://www.youtube.com./watch?v=uoeuh-EGj7s <-)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SmithL

Not really, the whole purpose of CARB is to further a POLITICAL agenda, not a scientific one.
::::

Without any doubt. It is what the so-called government of Taxifornia is all about. POLITICAL POWER. The state and its people be damned....so goes any liberal-controlled state.


3 posted on 12/02/2009 7:40:26 AM PST by EagleUSA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SmithL; sully777; vigl; Cagey; Abathar; A. Patriot; B Knotts; getsoutalive; muleskinner; ...
Rest In Peace, old friend, your work is finished.....

If you want ON or OFF the DIESEL ”KnOcK” LIST just FReepmail me.....

This is a fairly HIGH VOLUME ping list on some days.....

4 posted on 12/02/2009 7:41:15 AM PST by Red Badger (Al Gore is the Bernie Madoff of environmentalism. He belongs in jail. - Unknown Blogger)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SmithL

Tran was demoted to the climatology department.


5 posted on 12/02/2009 7:41:25 AM PST by Cold Heart
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SmithL
This bullsh*t is costing my employer a pile of money....money better spent on being competitive rather than being needlessly "clean."

We, the regulated community, need to haul out their data and see if there's been monkey-business.

6 posted on 12/02/2009 7:44:05 AM PST by stboz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SmithL

Is this going to have any effect on the mandated Clean-Diesel trucks at California ports?


7 posted on 12/02/2009 7:45:12 AM PST by Yo-Yo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SmithL
. . . the author of a statistical study on diesel soot effects had falsified his academic credentials.
and
"Failure to reveal this information to the board prior to the vote not only casts doubt on the legitimacy of the truck rule, . . . adding, however, that he doesn't question the validity of the science.

"Fake but accurate".

It seems that the hacking of the climate data has set off a general questioning of ALL these types of "studies". I doubt that there are only two.

8 posted on 12/02/2009 7:47:33 AM PST by Oatka ("A society of sheep must in time beget a government of wolves." –Bertrand de Jouvenel)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SmithL

No, you don’t understand, it’s the INTENT that counts!


9 posted on 12/02/2009 7:49:50 AM PST by SouthTexas (God Bless our Fort Hood Troops)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SmithL

I have met Telles. He’s pretty dang sharp.


10 posted on 12/02/2009 7:50:00 AM PST by stboz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Yo-Yo
Is this going to have any effect on the mandated Clean-Diesel trucks at California ports?

Nothing will change in a communists far left liberal State or Feds. Fraud, lying and spin is the left way of life and Kalifornia is polluted with these RATS.

11 posted on 12/02/2009 7:51:28 AM PST by Logical me (Oh, well!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: SmithL
With the CRU scandal, and today swindling in the Denmark (COPENHAGEN !)carbon credit market, and now this crap in Kalifornia one might begin to glean a hint that we're seeing the tip of the iceberg (pun intended) in the worldwide global warming scam.

...but maybe its just me....

12 posted on 12/02/2009 7:58:42 AM PST by chiller ( ALMOST SPEECHLESS)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Yo-Yo

I doubt it.


13 posted on 12/02/2009 8:00:49 AM PST by SmithL (SARCHASM: The gulf between the maker of sarcastic wit and the person who just doesn't get it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: SmithL

>>”Failure to reveal this information to the board prior to the vote not only casts doubt on the legitimacy of the truck rule, but also upon the legitimacy of CARB itself,” Telles said, adding, however, that he doesn’t question the validity of the science.

Why wouldn’t you question the validity of the science, when the scientist involved is a proven liar? Especially when we have the example of the East Anglia CRU for so-called “scientists” lying to appease power-hungry politicians.


14 posted on 12/02/2009 8:05:19 AM PST by FreedomPoster (No Representation without Taxation!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: AdmSmith; Berosus; bigheadfred; Convert from ECUSA; dervish; Ernest_at_the_Beach; Fred Nerks; ...

Falsified academic credentials? Hey, if he also cheats on his taxes, there’ll be a job for him in the Obama administration.


15 posted on 12/02/2009 8:15:16 AM PST by SunkenCiv (https://secure.freerepublic.com/donate/__Since Jan 3, 2004__Profile updated Monday, January 12, 2009)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SmithL
Also, the low sulphur is a bit of a ruse.

The sulphur is needed to help lubricate the engines and help them last longer.

It's also a nightmare for refiners to get that last little bit of sulphur out of the crude, it really hangs on.

Better all around to just leave it be, "sleepin' dogs", and all that.

16 posted on 12/02/2009 8:36:00 AM PST by norraad ("What light!">Blues Brothers)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SmithL; Pete-R-Bilt; B4Ranch; glock rocks; SouthTexas

CARB PING...


17 posted on 12/02/2009 9:25:06 AM PST by tubebender (Some minds are like concrete Thoroughly mixed up and permanently set...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: tubebender
Doesn't matter that the research is flawed, the researchers are frauds, just believe us, we're from the government and we're here to help you.
18 posted on 12/02/2009 9:42:52 AM PST by SouthTexas (God Bless our Fort Hood Troops)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: SmithL

the whole purpose of CARB is to further a POLITICAL agenda, not a scientific one.

worth repeating ;-)


19 posted on 12/02/2009 9:50:59 AM PST by NormsRevenge (Semper Fi ... Godspeed .. Monthly Donor Onboard .. May yur bandwidth exceed your girth)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SmithL

www.KILLCARB.org!!!


20 posted on 12/02/2009 2:46:10 PM PST by SierraWasp (AARP is guilty of Elder Abuse by endorsing a law that eliminates Medicare Advantaqe plans!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson