Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Obama wants Afghan war over in 3 years, officials say (CUT AND RUN)
CNN ^ | 12/01/09

Posted on 12/01/2009 9:27:46 AM PST by MinorityRepublican

Washington (CNN) -- President Obama intends to conclude the Afghanistan war and withdraw most U.S. troops within three years, according to senior administration officials.

Obama is sending 30,000 additional troops to Afghanistan and ordering military officials to get the reinforcements there within six months, White House officials told CNN Tuesday.

Obama will travel to the U.S. Military Academy at West Point, New York, later Tuesday to officially announce his plans. It would to be his second escalation of U.S. forces in the war-torn Islamic country since he came to power in January.

The president also is seeking further troop commitments from NATO allies as part of a counterinsurgency strategy aimed at wiping out al Qaeda elements and stabilizing the country while training Afghan forces.

The expected new troop deployment would increase the total U.S. commitment to roughly 100,000 troops in Afghanistan, bolstered by about 45,000 NATO forces.

(Excerpt) Read more at cnn.com ...


TOPICS: Breaking News
KEYWORDS: afghanistan; bho44; bhogwot; cutandrun; oef; oefsurge
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-85 next last
To: MinorityRepublican
bolstered by about 45,000 NATO forces

I wouldn't count on that. Oboma sees a victory as a failure. Why should they die for American liberalism?

21 posted on 12/01/2009 9:47:17 AM PST by concerned about politics ("Get thee behind me, Liberal")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MinorityRepublican

So Obama’s plan is to
1)half-@$$edly support the general’s recommendation,
2)institute ROE’s that will guarantee that more troops will be killed for no reason and we will eventually lose heart and
3)then to cut and run just in time for the 2012 elections
4)blame George Bush.


22 posted on 12/01/2009 9:49:12 AM PST by Blood of Tyrants (The Second Amendment. Don't MAKE me use it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MinorityRepublican

For him, it will be. He won’t be in office any more than 3 years...at the latest!


23 posted on 12/01/2009 9:49:52 AM PST by SueRae
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ExSoldier

did it take 6 months to trickle in troops for the Iraq surge?

A 6 month buildup does not sound like a “surge”. The word victory does not appear in any of his announced “strategy”


24 posted on 12/01/2009 9:50:26 AM PST by silverleaf (Ours is the only country on earth with a ventriloquist dummy for President)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: ExSoldier

Geez, you’ve missed the point entirely!! It doesn’t matter if we can do it in 6 months with the extra troops. By using ANY sort of a date it allows the enemy to go home, lay low and KNOW the enemy is leaving on a date certain.

It is the STUPIDEST and most poorly thought out strategy imaginable. It was done for one reason, to appease his anti American base. he has all but guaranteed Afghanistan will become another Viet Nam.


25 posted on 12/01/2009 9:51:50 AM PST by 101voodoo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: MinorityRepublican

This isn’t simply just ‘cut & run’. This will be ‘Lose first, then Cut & Run’.


26 posted on 12/01/2009 9:54:28 AM PST by Hoodat (For the weapons of our warfare are mighty in God for pulling down strongholds.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ExSoldier
The problem isn't that he wants the war over in three years. Who doesn't?! Even sooner would be better.

But letting the Taliban/al Qaeda know exactly how long they need to lay low and rebuild in secret is an asinine plan. They will stockpile weapons and train, waiting until right before our next presidential election and then unleash holy hell on our retreating soldiers to declare victory. And they will be right.

27 posted on 12/01/2009 9:55:25 AM PST by dead (I've got my eye out for Mullah Omar.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: Brad from Tennessee
Obama hosted India's prime minister with a state dinner recently. I think one option may be to abandon Afghanistan and Pakistan and draw the new line at the Pakistan-India border.

Uh....he was probably trying to buy the guys vote with stimulous dollars before the meeting in Copenhagen. Oboma just isn't that deep.

28 posted on 12/01/2009 9:55:39 AM PST by concerned about politics ("Get thee behind me, Liberal")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: MinorityRepublican

I think the GOP ought to call for the generals to testify in front of congress like Petraeus did on Iraq


29 posted on 12/01/2009 10:00:40 AM PST by uncbob
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MinorityRepublican
"Wars begin when you will, but they do not end when you please" - Machiavelli

"The quickest way to end a war is to lose it" - George Orwell


30 posted on 12/01/2009 10:01:33 AM PST by Gritty (The war is over. Al-Qaeda won in Washington. That has made all the difference.-Andrew McCarthy)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: stevecmd

Withdraw the Rules of Engagement, go in there and bomb them back into the stone age, then we can safely pull out all of our troops in the next year.........hows that?


31 posted on 12/01/2009 10:03:29 AM PST by Concho
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: concerned about politics; livius

Just a theory. Both of your explanations make sense.


32 posted on 12/01/2009 10:08:54 AM PST by Brad from Tennessee (A politician can't give you anything he hasn't first stolen from you.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: concerned about politics

It’s hard for me to hold him to his campaign promises because it was so completely and utterly obvious to me that he was a liar and the truth was not in him and it really didn’t MATTER what he said, he would do just what he liked once he got in there.

FUBO.


33 posted on 12/01/2009 10:10:13 AM PST by ichabod1 ( I am rolling over in my grave and I am not even dead yet.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: dead
But letting the Taliban/al Qaeda know exactly how long they need to lay low and rebuild in secret is an asinine plan. They will stockpile weapons and train, waiting until right before our next presidential election and then unleash holy hell on our retreating soldiers to declare victory. And they will be right.

Obama would have sent a handwritten note to the Germans warning them about the D-Day invasion had he been given the chance.

34 posted on 12/01/2009 10:11:25 AM PST by 444Flyer (You're either with us and our falsely accused Navy Seals, or you're with the terrorists.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: ExSoldier

You don’t get a victory by dispatching 75% of the minimum the generals in the field say they need and putting a timeframe on the operation.


35 posted on 12/01/2009 10:11:33 AM PST by ichabod1 ( I am rolling over in my grave and I am not even dead yet.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: Concho

The problem is, it already is the stone age in Afghanistan. They never made it any farther. There’s no infrastructure, no loyalty, no national pride. Its a tribal nation with few educated citizens to raise up into leadership. Its an un-winnable war. We got Al-Qaeda and now its time to come home before more of our boys die under the new ROE.


36 posted on 12/01/2009 10:12:15 AM PST by Karma Police (Praise the Lord and pass the ammunition!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: MinorityRepublican

And just to think. It took him 3 f’ing months to come up with this revelation!


37 posted on 12/01/2009 10:13:56 AM PST by b4its2late (Before you can control a horse, you have to break it. Sound familiar?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: dead

I doubt if they even bother to lay low. This just gives them an idea of how long they have to last and when to start their major offensive.


38 posted on 12/01/2009 10:14:09 AM PST by ichabod1 ( I am rolling over in my grave and I am not even dead yet.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: MinorityRepublican

That’s nice, but the next question is-—will Al Qaeda and the Taliban stop fighting in 3 years?


39 posted on 12/01/2009 10:14:58 AM PST by Virginia Ridgerunner (Sarah Palin has crossed the Rubicon!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: stevecmd

maybe we’d have it won in less than three years if this pathetic, disgusting POS would have sent the General what he asked for when he asked for it.


40 posted on 12/01/2009 10:16:51 AM PST by wny
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-85 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson