Posted on 11/20/2009 5:42:26 AM PST by Texas Fossil
8.15 PM UPDATE: The Hadley CRU director admits the emails seem to be genuine:
The director of Britains leading Climate Research Unit, Phil Jones, has told Investigate magazines TGIF Edition tonight ..."It was a hacker. We were aware of this about three or four days ago that someone had hacked into our system and taken and copied loads of data files and emails."
TGIF asked Jones about the controversial email discussing hiding the decline, and Jones explained what he was trying to say .
So the 1079 emails and 72 documents seem indeed evidence of a scandal involving most of the most prominent scientists pushing the man-made warming theory - a scandal that is one of the greatest in modern science. Ive been adding some of the most astonishing in updates below - emails suggesting conspiracy, collusion in exaggerating warming data, possibly illegal destruction of embarrassing information, organised resistance to disclosure, manipulation of data, private admissions of flaws in their public claims and much more. If it is as it now seems, never again will peer review be used to shout down sceptics.
This is clearly not the work of some hacker, but of an insider whos now blown the whistle.
(Excerpt) Read more at blogs.news.com.au ...
NOW someone do the same thing for Obozo's hidden records.
If what this following email means what I think it means, then the wheels have just come off the Global Warming movement!
****
From: Phil Jones
To: ray bradley ,mann@xxxxx.xxx, mhughes@xxxx.xxx
Subject: Diagram for WMO Statement
Date: Tue, 16 Nov 1999 13:31:15 +0000
Cc: k.briffa@xxx.xx.xx,t.osborn@xxxx.xxx
Dear Ray, Mike and Malcolm,
Once Tims got a diagram here well send that either later today or
first thing tomorrow.
Ive just completed Mikes Nature trick of adding in the real temps
to each series for the last 20 years (ie from 1981 onwards) amd from
1961 for Keiths to hide the decline. Mikes series got the annual
land and marine values while the other two got April-Sept for NH land
N of 20N. The latter two are real for 1999, while the estimate for 1999
for NH combined is +0.44C wrt 61-90. The Global estimate for 1999 with
data through Oct is +0.35C cf. 0.57 for 1998.
Thanks for the comments, Ray.
Cheers
Phil
Prof. Phil Jones
Climatic Research Unit Telephone +44 (0) xxxxx
School of Environmental Sciences Fax +44 (0) xxxx
University of East Anglia
Norwich Email p.jones@xxxx.xxx
NR4 7TJ
UK
Umm... pardon me, but this is pretty huge.
And series?
Personally, I’d like to see that crack team of 11 investigative reporters that “fact checked” Sarah Palin’s book do the same for Al Gore’s new one.
Think that’ll happen?
PING!!
This could be hugh and series! Some Al Gore and American ‘globull warming scientists’ are involved. Paging Al Gore...please pick up the emergency CYA phone....lol!!
See also:
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2390643/posts
UH! OH, Al..........
What I would like is for some “hacker” to divulge internal communications between MSNBC, CNN, PBS, ABC, NBC, CBS, and the NYT about how they can work with the DNC to utterly screw over the Republicans in the 2008 elections, and trick the public into supporting Obama at all costs.
As some of the responders (look at the link) to this article are saying, “be cautious, this could be a setup”. However, it also appears this is catching like wildfire on the internet with the number of google hits for “Hadley hacked”.
I am hopeful this will hasten the demise of the AGW scam.
bump
Yes it does.
I wonder when the corrupt MSM will report on this?
The only reason I say that is because crackers and hackers almost always include an .nfo file in their final releases, giving a shout out to themselves.
Of course, the lack of an .nfo could mean anything: the hacker might be very serious, or scared, or just not in the habit of including an .nfo in their work...but still, you see that credit-taking around 90% of the time.
Thanks for technical insight.
This is cool! Or is it hot? ;)
Seems as though someone went to a lot of trouble to get this info out...
This is cool! Or is it hot? ;)
Seems as though someone went to a lot of trouble to get this info out...
Ping of note.
GloBULL warming related???
http://archives.cnn.com/2001/fyi/news/08/21/wind.chill/index.html
Wind chill factor gets new formula (”numbers have been warmed up”)
August 21, 2001
EXCERPT
Under the old system, an air temperature of 20 degrees Fahrenheit with a 15-mph wind speed would result in a wind chill of 5 degrees below zero, according to the weather service.
Under the same conditions, the new index would show an 11-degree increase in the wind chill factor: 6 degrees above zero.
“We’re trying to ... generate a public education campaign, and we urge our users out there to take this seriously even though the numbers have been warmed up,” said Mark Tew, who heads the weather service project as chairman of the Joint Action Group on Temperature Indices.
//
http://www.nws.noaa.gov/os/windchill/index.shtml
In the fall of 2000, the Office of the Federal Coordinator for Meteorological Services and Supporting Research (OFCM) formed a group consisting of several Federal agencies, MSC, the academic community (Indiana University-Purdue University in Indianapolis (IUPUI), University of Delaware and University of Missouri), and the International Society of Biometeorology to evaluate and improve the wind chill formula. The group, chaired by the NWS, is called the Joint Action Group for temperature Indices (JAG/TI). JAG/TI’s goal is to upgrade and standardize the index for temperature extremes internationally (e.g. Windchill Index).
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.