Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Spktyr

http://www.fivesevenforum.com/viewtopic.php?f=18&t=57

These ballistics tests showed 4” wound channel in a pork shoulder. Ballistic gel was showing 9 to 11 inches of penetration. Its hardly a .22 magnum. Obviously it is not in the same league with a .223, but it does leave a really nasty wound channel. It would be interesting to know the extent of the police officers wounds.


55 posted on 11/06/2009 11:29:18 PM PST by Concho
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 53 | View Replies ]


To: Concho

I know, but real world reports show that (perhaps not surprisingly) the pork isn’t that accurate in this case. You get penetration but not much of a permanent wound channel.

For example, just reported on TXCN: One soldier took a 5.7 round in the sole of his boot at relatively close range and it didn’t even go all the way through, nor did it blow the sole off.


57 posted on 11/06/2009 11:33:08 PM PST by Spktyr (Overwhelmingly superior firepower and the willingness to use it is the only proven peace solution.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 55 | View Replies ]

To: Concho
These ballistics tests showed 4” wound channel in a pork shoulder. Ballistic gel was showing 9 to 11 inches of penetration. Its hardly a .22 magnum.

Bullet weight and muzzle velocity are not that much different from .22 WMR. 5.7 is a little faster out of a little shorter barrel, bullet weight is or can be, the same.

119 posted on 11/07/2009 12:21:50 PM PST by El Gato ("The Second Amendment is the RESET button of the United States Constitution." -- Doug McKay)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 55 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson