I know, but real world reports show that (perhaps not surprisingly) the pork isn’t that accurate in this case. You get penetration but not much of a permanent wound channel.
For example, just reported on TXCN: One soldier took a 5.7 round in the sole of his boot at relatively close range and it didn’t even go all the way through, nor did it blow the sole off.
Perhaps, but eleven inches of penetration and a four inch permanent wound channel is significant. What isnt known is which ammo he was using. If he was using the LF ammo, then it is significantly lower energy also. Ballistic tests are just that—tests. Only surgical terminal performance results will really tell anything, that is why I said it would be interesting to see the policewomans reports.