Posted on 11/04/2009 2:34:03 PM PST by JSDude1
The third-ranking Republican in the House of Representatives on Wednesday endorsed Conservative Party candidate Doug Hoffman for the 2010 midterm elections.
House Republican Conference chairman Mike Pence (R-Ind.) offered his support to Hoffman, who was defeated at the hands of Democrat Bill Owens in a highly contested special election in upstate New York.
"Well, let me say that the lesson here is that we all need to fall behind Doug Hoffman for next fall’s election," Pence told a conservative blog today. "I look forward to welcoming him to Congress a year from now. I think he ran a brilliant campaign."
“Pence for President in 2012”
Pence has some matters to clear up before I, and many others would even think of him as a presidential possibility. He first came to my attention when, at the last minute, he popped up and tried to snatch defeat from the jaws of victory during the 2006 amnesty for illegals debate:
http://www.pittsburghlive.com/x/pittsburghtrib/opinion/columnists/guests/s_457867.html
WOuld you please post what Pence’s exact stand is on illegal immigrants? I saw him a few times on TV interviews and to me he came across as being knowledgeable on issues and having wonderful TV presence.
Pence needs to clarify what his position on amnesty is, certainly not me. But he did inject himself late into the 2006 debate with what was viewed as a stealthy amnesty proposal, AFTER the debate had practically been won by the anti-amnesty members of the Senate.
Plenty of sources to read about it:
Wouldn’t even consider the guy as of now.
>> His name is Paul Maroun.
Should I infer that a vacancy by Hoffman would have let Maroun run as the Independent? If not, then Maroun is insignificant in the national story of NY-23.
It’s vertical expedition, this quest for Conservatism - at least from the standpoint of representation. Conservatives across the nation had a stake in NY-23, not to squander its local interest, but to support the cause and will of Conservatism exemplified in Hoffman’s non-conforming, independent, and risky decision to stand up in opposition to moderate republicanism.
I look forward to knowing more about Maroun. I’m not a subscriber to “the only solution is a third party solution”, but wholeheartedly support the independent runs when the GOP play undermines the cause for Conservatism.
Mike Pence should be the 2012 nominee for the Presidency.
Which District does Hoffman live in?
Agreed. Ron Paul has actually written legislation to make real and incredible change, while many Republicans have just collected a check for nothing.
One candidate is Paul Mauron. He was one of the 9 candidates for the republican nomination, and could easily have won the seat if the republican leaders had chosen him. He didn’t run on the conservative party line because he pledged to support the republican as a condition of competing for the nomination.
>> One candidate is Paul Mauron.
Another FReeper mentioned Mauron.
Hoffman may have been instrumental in unplugging the crap that’s causing the Conservatives indigestion. But, if a solid Conservative other than Hoffman gets the Republican nomination for 2010, will Hoffman still run as the Independent Conservative?
No. He was part of the Republican party, and only ran because they picked DeDe, the Democrat pretending to be a Republican who had friends in high places and wanted a huge salaried-job with perks.
I don’t think he’d run against a conservative. The conservative party would cross-endorse, like they usually do when the local republicans don’t completely ignore them.
IN my opinion, DeDe’s friend saw a “chance” to get a liberal into the seat, because it was a special election and they didn’t have to win a primary, and they figured they didn’t need the conservative party so they gave them the finger.
That’s really what started this — locals not paying attention to the political landscape.
And on a more general note, looking back, I can only say that if republicans who support cap and trade, abortion, socialized medicine, and card check feel like they are being told there is no place in the republican party for them, I would say, good, you’ve got the message, get out.
I’m all for a “big tent”, but I want a real tent with a roof over our heads and walls on the sides, not a virtual tent where everybody is inside and it means NOTHING to be in the tent.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.