Well, that does it for TToE.
Again.
Casey Luskin alert!
When I read the above, the following came to mind:
Genesis 1:24 And God said, “Let the land produce living creatures according to their kinds: livestock, creatures that move along the ground, and wild animals, each according to its kind.” And it was so. 25 God made the wild animals according to their kinds, the livestock according to their kinds, and all the creatures that move along the ground according to their kinds. And God saw that it was good.
So does this mean we are on the path to creating centaurs and mermaids?
God don’t make “junk”.
From page 307 of “Darwin’s Ghost” by Steve Jones.
“When seen through the lens of evolution, facts as disparate as the true affinities of birds, the life of the deep sea vents, the multiplied structure of the earthworm and the nipples of male animals all come into common focus as evidence of descent with modification. Together they bear persuasive witness to change: enough to establish the truth of evolution even without the mass of supporting evidence given elsewhere in these pages.”
I often wonder where the biological scientists get the idea that just because we don’t know what something is for, that it can only be junk.
And who am I to question experts on ignorance?
Instead of studying DNA by doing science, they should have read about DNA in the Bible.
For 5 points, please demonstrate the production of ATP within a cell from one molecule of C6H12O6.
Every college Biology major freshman has to. Give it a shot.
The premise should have been that junk DNA was long misunderstood, not long ignored. If junk DNA was being ignored how could it have been studied to this conclusion?
It does, however, further trivialize the whole "Baramin" concept.
Non-coding DNA has in no way been ignored by biologists.....hint....that's why there is, you know, scientific research discovering some of the purposes for some of the non-coding DNA.
More lies from the Discovery Institute...