Skip to comments.
Is Doug Hoffman Bush-like on immigration?
24AheadDotCom ^
| 10/28/09
| self/Hoffman website
Posted on 11/01/2009 11:07:45 AM PST by lonewacko_dot_com
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61 next last
To: lonewacko_dot_com
A politicians answer.
It still doesn’t explain his stance on illegal immigration
2
posted on
11/01/2009 11:11:40 AM PST
by
rasl04
("Extremism in the defense of liberty is no vice" Barry Goldwater)
To: lonewacko_dot_com
And where is Owens on illegal immigration?
In other words, the issue doesn’t matter - this guy has enough conservative credentials at this point.
3
posted on
11/01/2009 11:13:05 AM PST
by
BobL
To: lonewacko_dot_com
Sorry, but I still like a person that is willing to address situations
and not set on the fence. It’s true, we need immigration addressed
but not the “let’s put down the red carpet” mentality of the left.
It’s not going to be easy but a wall is only a band aid.
I say, give him a chance.
4
posted on
11/01/2009 11:14:35 AM PST
by
TribalPrincess2U
(demonicRATS, the party of taxes and death. Is this what you want?)
To: lonewacko_dot_com
Oh please, now at this late date we’re going to find problems with Hoffman? And do what, elect a democrat over the conservative we all insisted on? Let’s get down to business and win now.
5
posted on
11/01/2009 11:16:54 AM PST
by
Williams
(i)
To: rasl04
Whatever his stance, you can bet the liberal democrat is more apt to give illegals citizenship and free benefits than Hoffman. It is like asking who will be for bigger government, and imperfect conservative or a liberal democrat? We are not designing a candidate here, we are picking the best of the two. It's a no brainer.
6
posted on
11/01/2009 11:17:59 AM PST
by
HwyChile
To: Williams
But it’s best we get his vow of no amnesty now
7
posted on
11/01/2009 11:18:21 AM PST
by
rasl04
("Extremism in the defense of liberty is no vice" Barry Goldwater)
To: lonewacko_dot_com
A huge difference at this point is that Bush had no intention to stop illegal immigration. As far as I'm concerned, he flat out lied to the American people. He wanted us to merge with Mexico and Canada to become the Americas.
Hoffman? It's hard to say what he would do. We only have Bush's record to track. The main difference is that Bush was running for President and Hoffman is not.
8
posted on
11/01/2009 11:19:23 AM PST
by
NRA2BFree
(President Obama agreed to commit an additional 40,000 troops to help fight Fox News," Jay Leno)
To: BobL; william
Ah, the attempt to destroy him has begun.
Leaving aside the merits of whatever Hoffman said (or didn’t say), ANY Democrat is going to be worse than ANY Republican on this issue.
9
posted on
11/01/2009 11:20:40 AM PST
by
livius
To: rasl04
Sounds like he may be another Mel Martinez.
To: lonewacko_dot_com
We need fiscal and social conservatives in office immediately. We will straighten them out later on immigration. Let’s work on getting people back to work and protecting our Constitution.
11
posted on
11/01/2009 11:23:06 AM PST
by
rabidralph
(http://www.thealaskafundtrust.com/ http://www.sarahpac.com)
To: livius
“Ah, the attempt to destroy him has begun.”
Good point - and NO DOUBT it’s coming from the same bunch that nominated Scarface. They are obviously SCARED TO DEATH.
12
posted on
11/01/2009 11:25:01 AM PST
by
BobL
To: lonewacko_dot_com
Even if he’s sympathetic to Amnesty, we have a better chance of stopping it with him than we do with a Democrat.
13
posted on
11/01/2009 11:29:54 AM PST
by
DesScorp
To: rasl04
Thanks for pointing that out. One minor issue: if you ask any politician if they support “amnesty”, they’ll say no.
You have to ask him whether he would ever support “comprehensive immigration reform”, what form of “reform” he’d support, and under what exact conditions.
To: lonewacko_dot_com
Should the time to declare and act ever come many will be shocked at the resultant splintering, IMO.
|
|
|
To: fuzzybutt
Too bad we didn’t have the Internet back in the ‘70s to prevent that moderate Reagan from getting elected./sarc
16
posted on
11/01/2009 11:34:46 AM PST
by
rabidralph
(http://www.thealaskafundtrust.com/ http://www.sarahpac.com)
To: lonewacko_dot_com
So he is not perfect. No one is.
17
posted on
11/01/2009 11:35:46 AM PST
by
MNJohnnie
(Note to the GOP: Do not count your votes until they are cast.)
To: rabidralph
And that’s how you get Rino Creep.
18
posted on
11/01/2009 11:35:53 AM PST
by
TypeZoNegative
(Pro life & Vegan because I respect all life, Republican because our enemies don't respect ours.)
To: Williams; lonewacko_dot_com
We better find SOMETHING wrong with this guy before a more conservative person is elected!
Heaven forbid if we actually make a small move back in the same direction!
Sheesh! No wonder we keep losing!
If these people who criticize Hoffman and others like him are so damned perfect, why don't they run?
19
posted on
11/01/2009 11:37:17 AM PST
by
airborne
(I'm from an older generation. When killing the enemy was a good thing!)
To: lonewacko_dot_com
So which Leftist propaganda outfit do you work for?
3 days before the election and SUDDENLY you notice this? I smell a rat.
20
posted on
11/01/2009 11:51:12 AM PST
by
MNJohnnie
(Note to the GOP: Do not count your votes until they are cast.)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson