Posted on 10/26/2009 8:29:54 PM PDT by Fractal Trader
{...}l'm a Republican. Conservative....income-support programs.....Each instance of solicitation for false testimony by attorney Orly Taitz is listed below. ... includes instances where attorney Orly Taitz advised and encouraged me to engage in other illegal activity. Each instance of attorney Orly Taitz asking me (1) to provide false testimony in civil action
(Excerpt) Read more at scribd.com ...
I report. You decide.
More BC craziness Ping!
Except it was reported here twice before, at least.
Last FR post about Lucas Smith was in September. This is dated in October.
Either this woman is over the target as they say or she has the worst luck in complainants.
thanks for the ping, I did read it several days ago and decided to ignore it, he’s tried my patience and outlived any credibility he may have had.
FAKE
I know Orly, and I do NOT believe this fraud Lucass Smith for one second.
This is interesting.
parsy, who says the read is very revealing
Fake? It looks like an authentic court document to me. Why do you think it is a fake?
Well how come you didn’t ping me to it?
parsy, whose feelings are hurt
There’s supposed to be some adultery in there, too, but I haven’t tried to find it yet.
I decided I do not care.
Are these the same documents? :
Lucas Daniel Smith / Electronic Service of Copies for Civil Action SACV09-00082-DOC (Anx)
Lucas Daniel Smith 10.12.09 new Declaration SACV09-00082-DOC (Anx)
http://www.scribd.com/doc/21451147/Lucas-Daniel-Smith-10-12-09-new-Declaration-SACV09-00082-DOC-Anx
Yes. Same documents. All have 12 October as the date.
I haven't seen it posted, anywhere. This is the first I've heard of it. Subornation of perjury is a big deal. And, it's a bigger deal in federal court.
This Smith character could be called anything but a reliable or credible witness, but the judge is ethically bound to forward this to the CalBar, in addition to either investigate it himself, or referring it to the USA. Having said that, it doesn't appear that he actually perjured himself, which is a tenant to proving someone actually suborned perjury. Long story short, it's probably meaningless, criminally, but perhaps not inconsequential with respect to her own license.
It didn’t bother him she supposedly asked him to lie.
Seems to me they’re now working on the sluts angle.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.