Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Marriott Boycotted Over Porn
LA Weekly ^ | Oct. 22. 2009 | Dennis Romero

Posted on 10/23/2009 2:22:48 PM PDT by Colofornian

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-38 last
To: Colofornian

For the first time, I agree with you on a Mormon issue. Mormon owned businesses should not offer porn in any form.

I do hope that the boycott extends to other major hotels that offer the same. It seems odd that they singled out Marriot...? They’re still ticked off by the huge success in defeating Prop. 8, I guess.


21 posted on 10/23/2009 3:48:12 PM PDT by panaxanax (At what point will the American people finally scream out "NO MORE!!"?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Nuc1
It is beyond belief how far this nation has sunk in the last 20 years.

In what sense? That porn video is now available in hotels or that the porn shown in hotel feature 'unsafe' sex?

22 posted on 10/23/2009 3:51:10 PM PDT by paudio (Road to hell is paved by unintended consequences of good intentions)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Colofornian

Does this mean that if I stay at that Marriott I will have to wear my socks in the shower?


23 posted on 10/23/2009 4:02:07 PM PDT by Venturer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Colofornian

I wonder, are these folks who belong or worse sit on the boards of these organization born laughing stocks, or do they work hard at becoming laughing stocks? Same question could apply for the current administration and congress.


24 posted on 10/23/2009 4:04:56 PM PDT by gidget7 (Duncan Hunter-Valley Forge Republican!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Colofornian

Cool beans
I can stay at a Marriott property
and not have to see any fags.
What a great marketing strategy!
“Marriott - we’re queer free.”


25 posted on 10/23/2009 4:10:53 PM PDT by Repeal The 17th (I AM JIM THOMPSON!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Nuc1
If I remember correctly 1989 was not much different than today.
26 posted on 10/23/2009 6:05:14 PM PDT by gusty
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: freedumb2003

I can’t resist. Meant for comedy only. No offense is meant. Here it goes. Any other reason your done with the movie in 15 seconds.


27 posted on 10/23/2009 6:07:03 PM PDT by gusty
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Colofornian

Not being familiar with porn other than I know I dont ever want to watch it...

I dont know what porn in a so called “respectable” hotel is suppose to be like.....

I dont stay in hotels that show porn...

They can tell the guy is naked ???

What filth...


28 posted on 10/23/2009 6:47:04 PM PDT by Tennessee Nana
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: napscoordinator

What 50’s did you live in?


29 posted on 10/23/2009 6:50:17 PM PDT by svcw (The time is near at hand which must determine whether Americans are to be free men or slaves. GW)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: gusty

>>I can’t resist. Meant for comedy only. No offense is meant. Here it goes. Any other reason your done with the movie in 15 seconds.
<<

Man, did I walk into THAT one!

OTOH, my wife said “why do you last 50% longer with the movies??!”

LOL


30 posted on 10/23/2009 6:52:24 PM PDT by freedumb2003 (Communism comes to America: 1/20/2009. Keep your powder dry, folks. Sic semper tyrannis)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: paudio; Nuc1; VR-21; donna; gidget7; panaxanax; napscoordinator; jdub; jessduntno; traditional1; ...
It is beyond belief how far this nation has sunk in the last 20 years. [Nuc1]

In what sense? That porn video is now available in hotels or that the porn shown in hotel feature 'unsafe' sex? [Paudio]

I'd say in the following senses:
(1) That a porn prostitute and her allies -- all of whom want "condom-correctness" in the part of the porn industry they still endorse-- are more riled up over some aspects of the porn industry and its distributors (i.e. Marriott Hotel chain) than conservatives and conservative Republicans!!! [Have we seen many conservatives, FReepers, or conservative Republican boycott this part of the porn industry???]
(2) While the Lds Church-owned Deseret News took Mitt Romney to task a couple of years ago for his board member connection to porn-laden Marriott, note that the Mormon leaders in this way were hypocritical: IOW, while the "journalistic" side of the Lds church took a swing @ Mitt, how did the Lds church itself approach this issue? (Why, they promoted Marriott owner Bill Marriott within the church hierarchy of leaders -- assigning him to be an Area Seventy and a member of the Lds Church's Sixth Quorum of the Seventy -- among the top 70 leaders in the Church. This, despite the fact that the Marriott hotel chain has been in this porn biz for at least 20 years now!!!)
(3) I haven't seen FR Romney supporters or other conservative Romney supporters publicly critique Romney for being a long-standing (briefly interrupted) Marriott board member -- tying him to the porn industry.

Seems to me that the porn industry has become part of the Republican "Big Tent," the conservative coalition, and is more acceptable to many FReepers than it is to ex-porn prostitutes who still "high fives" much of the porn industry!

31 posted on 10/23/2009 8:02:57 PM PDT by Colofornian
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: colorcountry; Colofornian; Elsie; FastCoyote; svcw; Zakeet; SkyPilot; rightazrain; ...

Ping


32 posted on 10/24/2009 2:29:37 PM PDT by greyfoxx39 (ObaMugabe is turning this country into another Zimbabwe as fast as he can with MEDIA'S help.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: Colofornian
(briefly interrupted)

What's Latin for BRIEF?

33 posted on 10/25/2009 12:14:28 PM PDT by Elsie (Heck is where people, who don't believe in Gosh, think they are not going...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: Colofornian

Porn is OK but not using condoms isn’t.

Something is soooo wrong with this picture.

Maranatha, Jesus. Time to call it quits.


34 posted on 10/25/2009 4:15:20 PM PDT by metmom (Welfare was never meant to be a career choice.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: gusty
My memory is, unfortunately, much longer than that ;D)
35 posted on 10/26/2009 3:59:53 PM PDT by Nuc1 (NUC1 Sub pusher SSN 668 (Liberals Aren't Patriots))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: paudio
In what sense? That porn video is now available in hotels or that the porn shown in hotel feature 'unsafe' sex?

Yes and far more. Pick a subject; crime, morality, knowledge, manners, decency, truthfulness, etc. I can't think of anything better today than in 1964 or before. Beyond that I am more concerned by your question. Do you think the situation in this nation and the world is OK?

36 posted on 10/26/2009 4:06:30 PM PDT by Nuc1 (NUC1 Sub pusher SSN 668 (Liberals Aren't Patriots))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: napscoordinator
Actually it has been better. You don’t need porn in your hotel room...just take the laptop. /sarc. I think the country is the same as twenty years ago. I think the worst time in America was the 50’s only because of the sneaky ways that husbands bashed their wives heads in...people were molesting children...alcoholism was hidden...drugs were hidden...etc. Nothing is good in putting your head in the sand.

I grew up in the 50s and 60s. What you cited was considered abnormal. Even degenerate. And those activities were not anywhere as wide spread as your comment suggests. People today that argue things in the 50s and 60s were as they are today are the ones putting their heads in the sand. Perfect no, far better yes. No animosity intended.

37 posted on 10/26/2009 4:17:12 PM PDT by Nuc1 (NUC1 Sub pusher SSN 668 (Liberals Aren't Patriots))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: Colofornian

Good Post.


38 posted on 10/26/2009 4:18:18 PM PDT by Nuc1 (NUC1 Sub pusher SSN 668 (Liberals Aren't Patriots))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-38 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson