Skip to comments.
New medical marijuana policy issued
Associated Press ^
| October 18, 2009
| Devlin Barrett
Posted on 10/18/2009 9:06:03 PM PDT by pleasenoobama
WASHINGTON The Obama administration will not seek to arrest medical marijuana users and suppliers as long as they conform to state laws, under new policy guidelines to be sent to federal prosecutors Monday. Two Justice Department officials described the new policy to The Associated Press, saying prosecutors will be told it is not a good use of their time to arrest people who use or provide medical marijuana in strict compliance with state laws. The new policy is a significant departure from the Bush administration, which insisted it would continue to enforce federal anti-pot laws regardless of state codes.
(Excerpt) Read more at google.com ...
TOPICS: Breaking News; Culture/Society; Government
KEYWORDS: candycigarettes; dope; dopersrights; libertarians; marijuana; medicalmarijuana; potheads; statesrights; wod
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 261-262 next last
I searched, but I couldn't find any other posts on this topic.
Basic gist of the article is that Obama has made it official policy not to enforce federal marijuana laws when it is used for medicinal purposes. What does everyone think?
To: pleasenoobama
To: pleasenoobama
“...as long as they conform to state laws.”
Good move.
3
posted on
10/18/2009 9:09:13 PM PDT
by
trumandogz
(The Democrats are driving us to Socialism at 100 MPH -The GOP is driving us to Socialism at 97.5 MPH)
To: Magic Fingers
Here's the issue I see: I agree that there shouldn't be a federal ban on medicinal use of marijuana and that state law should reign supreme in this case, but if such a law exists, is it right for a president to be able to unilaterally force the federal government to ignore it? This seems to be granting an enormous amount of power to the president, power that wasn't explicitly granted to the executive branch by the Constitution.
4
posted on
10/18/2009 9:11:24 PM PDT
by
pleasenoobama
(Liberals lied, small government died)
To: All
The liberaltarians will be bowing before their new messiah now. He found a way to get them on his plantation.
Watch how much weed becomes "medical marijuana" now.
To: freedomwarrior998
Why are you opposed to State’s Rights?
6
posted on
10/18/2009 9:14:45 PM PDT
by
trumandogz
(The Democrats are driving us to Socialism at 100 MPH -The GOP is driving us to Socialism at 97.5 MPH)
To: freedomwarrior998
“The liberaltarians will be bowing before their new messiah now. He found a way to get them on his plantation. “
Hardly. This is like a .000 batter getting a piece of it that goes foul. Momentary excitement then back to reality.
7
posted on
10/18/2009 9:20:13 PM PDT
by
Rebelbase
(This is the time of year when ACORNS fall.)
To: pleasenoobama
I can't stand BO or his lackeys. That said, I have no problem with the feds backing off and recognizing State's rights.
Maybe this will free up a little time to investigate the thieves in DC like Rangel.
8
posted on
10/18/2009 9:20:36 PM PDT
by
Lawgvr1955
(You can never have too much cowbell !!)
To: pleasenoobama
Why did the 18th amendment need to be passed to allow the federal government to regulate the use of ethanol as an intoxicant, but no similar change in the Constitution is needed for every other intoxicant? The only reason I can think is the majority of the adult population drank in 1919, but smaller numbers of people other intoxicants so they were easier to brush aside. That's not an argument based on Constitutional limitations of government, but rather raw power.
9
posted on
10/18/2009 9:21:38 PM PDT
by
KarlInOhio
(Soon everyone will win a Nobel Peace Prize for not being George Bush...well, except for George Bush.)
To: pleasenoobama
Basic gist of the article is that Obama has made it official policy not to enforce federal marijuana laws when it is used for medicinal purposes. What does everyone think?
I think it sounds exactly like the child and his DHS Crappy Nappy's policy on
NON-enforcement of our immigration laws. Sheriff Joe stuck a finger in the Feds eye over the weekend - DHS revoked Joe's 287g program, but went ahead with his crime suppression sweeps anyway.
Sheriff Joe Arpaio: I dont take orders from anybody.
Listening to a local host tonight and 95% of callers say "Keep it up Joe, We support you, and keep telling the Feds to go to hell."
10
posted on
10/18/2009 9:26:22 PM PDT
by
Cheerio
(Barack Hussein 0bama=The Complete Destruction of American Capitalism)
To: pleasenoobama
I’m surprised it took him 9 months. We all knew the crackhead was going to stop the war on drugs.
Look for him to do the same with Cocaine, after all he admits to having been a user. And I expect he will turn a lot of pushers out of jail.
11
posted on
10/18/2009 9:33:21 PM PDT
by
DannyTN
To: freedomwarrior998
"Watch how much weed becomes "medical marijuana" now." But Dude, it's for my 'condition'.
12
posted on
10/18/2009 9:35:16 PM PDT
by
444Flyer
("Every society honors its live conformists and its dead troublemakers."--Mignon McLaughlin)
To: pleasenoobama
If you want to change the law, change the law. Just like if you want the constitution to read differently, change it. How hard is this to understand?
Then again, my dog in this fight is that the federal government has no regulation over drugs in the first place, as it is missing from the enumerated powers of the constitution, and should be deferred to the states... But it just galls me that rather than change the laws, they just simply choose to ignore them.
Liberals would be up in arms if a conservative did that.
13
posted on
10/18/2009 9:35:46 PM PDT
by
kingu
(Party for rent - conservative opinions not required.)
To: pleasenoobama
Well, he is going to do that same with illegal aliens too.
So this is a bad idea. Enforce the fricking law or change it.
But he will have the full weight of the US government confiscating your property and rights.
To: trumandogz
Why are you opposed to States Rights? Authoritarians, regardless of location on the spectrum, are alergic to autonomy of any scope. It gives them a reaction anywhere from mild irritation to anaphalactic shock.
Frowning takes 68 muscles.
Smiling takes 6.
Pulling this trigger takes 2.
I'm lazy.
15
posted on
10/18/2009 9:38:35 PM PDT
by
The Comedian
(Evil can only succeed if good men don't point at it and laugh.)
To: freedomwarrior998
Well, it makes sense. Obama the Dope supports dope.
16
posted on
10/18/2009 9:39:59 PM PDT
by
darkangel82
(I don't have a superiority complex, I'm just better than you.)
To: pleasenoobama
The Obama administration will not seek to arrest medical marijuana users and suppliers as long as they conform to state laws, under new policy guidelines to be sent to federal prosecutors Monday Paying taxes are among the "don't care" items in the Obama White House.
17
posted on
10/18/2009 9:42:56 PM PDT
by
a fool in paradise
(The character assassination of Rush Limbaugh is worse than what the Left accused Joe McCarthy of.)
To: Magic Fingers
Funny how he wants to make all flavored cigarettes(that aren’t menthol) and candy cigarettes illegal.
18
posted on
10/18/2009 9:44:06 PM PDT
by
a fool in paradise
(The character assassination of Rush Limbaugh is worse than what the Left accused Joe McCarthy of.)
To: pleasenoobama
Wonder if I could get a pack of “medical” cigarettes without paying all the tax...
19
posted on
10/18/2009 9:45:18 PM PDT
by
babygene
To: freedomwarrior998
20
posted on
10/18/2009 9:45:18 PM PDT
by
hsmomx3
(GO STEELERS!!!!!!!!!!!!)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 261-262 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson