Ehrlich is starting to look like Foster Brooks. He's never made as much sense as Brooks, though.
Posted on 10/14/2009 4:07:52 PM PDT by bkopto
...There is an Usurper in the White House, and his name is Barack Obama. He and those who aided him in this usurpation, including the DNC are guilty of Treason to the United States. Every law that has been passed, every treaty signed, every order issued to the military has zero legal weight.
This leads to a singularly terrifying reality that must be dealt with. The United States does not have a constitutional government....
The Examiner is from Long Island. Woo Hoo Long Island!
“If Obama’s legit, I’ll recognize him as my president.”
I completely agree with you. If he is qualified to be President, then why does he not just show the proof? He might be playing some political game, but I don’t care. This is a question about whether or not he is qualified to hold the office of the Presidency. He needs to stop fighting and show the evidence.
PAUL EHRLICH
HUMANITY IS A CANCER!
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Paul_R._Ehrlich
Ehrlich was the president of the Center for Conservation Biology at Stanford University. He is a fellow of the American Association for the Advancement of Science, the American Academy of Arts and Sciences, and the American Philosophical Society.
Ehrlich’s research group at Stanford currently works extensively on the study of natural populations of checkerspot butterflies (Euphydryas). Along with Dr. Gretchen Daily, he has conducted work in “countryside biogeography”, or the study of making human-disturbed areas hospitable to biodiversity. Ehrlich continues to conduct policy research on population and resource issues, focusing especially on endangered species, cultural evolution, environmental ethics, and the preservation of genetic resources.
[edit] Population growth predictions
Ehrlich wrote an article that appeared in New Scientist in December 1967. In that article, Ehrlich predicted that the world would experience famines sometime between 1970 and 1985 due to population growth outstripping resources. Ehrlich wrote that “the battle to feed all of humanity is over ... In the 1970s and 1980s hundreds of millions of people will starve to death in spite of any crash programs embarked upon now.” Ehrlich also stated, “India couldn’t possibly feed two hundred million more people by 1980,” and “I have yet to meet anyone familiar with the situation who thinks that India will be self-sufficient in food by 1971.” These specific predictions did not actually come to pass, and his later book The Population Explosion is much more cautious in its predictions.
The article led to the publication of The Population Bomb in 1968, advocating stringent population control policies.[7] His central argument on population is as follows:
“A cancer is an uncontrolled multiplication of cells; the population explosion is an uncontrolled multiplication of people. Treating only the symptoms of cancer may make the victim more comfortable at first, but eventually he dies - often horribly. A similar fate awaits a world with a population explosion if only the symptoms are treated. We must shift our efforts from treatment of the symptoms to the cutting out of the cancer. The operation will demand many apparent brutal and heartless decisions. The pain may be intense. But the disease is so far advanced that only with radical surgery does the patient have a chance to survive.”[8]
In his concluding chapter, Ehrlich offered a partial solution to the “population problem”:
“(We need) compulsory birth regulation... (through) the addition of temporary sterilants to water supplies or staple food. Doses of the antidote would be carefully rationed by the government to produce the desired family size”.[8]
Ehrlich’s views came to be accepted by many population control advocates in the United States and Europe in the 1960s and 1970s.[9] Since Ehrlich invoked the imagery of the “population bomb” overpopulation has been blamed for a variety of issues, including, increasing poverty, high unemployment rates, environmental degradation, famine and genocide.[10]
Ehrlich reviewed the predictions in his book The Population Bomb in a 2004 interview and the subsequent criticism that followed due to the specificity of the dates in his predictions.[11] He stated that some of his predictions did not occur, but noted that it was still “horrific” that 600 million people were very hungry and billions under-nourished or malnourished. He stated that his predictions about disease and climate change were correct.[11]
The Population Explosion was co-authored with Anne Ehrlich and published in 1990.
Ehrlich and his wife Anne have been praised for raising awareness of environmental matters and for bringing to public awareness issues regarding population, resources and environment, as well as making ecology a household word.[12]
[edit] Other activities
Ehrlich was one of the founders of the group Zero Population Growth in 1968, along with Richard Bowers and Charles Remington. He and his wife Anne were on the board of advisors of the Federation for American Immigration Reform until 2003. He is currently a patron of the Optimum Population Trust.
With Stephen Schneider and two other authors, writing in the January 2002 issue of Scientific American, he critiqued Bjørn Lomborg’s The Skeptical Environmentalist.
“I’d love a calculation of how much FR bandwidth has been wasted on this topic.”
Wanting the truth is a waste of bandwidth? You do know this is a conservative forum, don’t you? I thought only liberals wanted to hide from the truth.
Beckwith is a Freeper, and a DAMN fine man!
The Obamafile DESERVES all the support we can give it, and for sure, it can’t be cheap running all that bandwidth from his site!
Man, talk about shooting yourself in the face....
Damn, someone... EVERYONE cache that page now before it disappears when they figure out just how bad they f’ed up on this one!
Yes I’m aware. Been here as long as you. But we would mock DU and others for all the Haliburton stories and other Bush conspiracy nonsense. I don’t see how this is different. Plenty of circumstantial evidence but haven’t been able to prove a thing. Been kicked out of every court this comes into to.
To each his own I guess.
They are counting on the fact that they think that the British citizenship disappeared when Kenya became Sovereign. it didn’t.
Oopsie, thats why Canadians and Australians could be British as well as Canadian and Australian.
But who would believe a thing Obama says about it to begin with, he is out to cover up the truth.
“Been here as long as you. But we would mock DU and others for all the Haliburton stories and other Bush conspiracy nonsense.”
None of the Bush scandals involved whether he was qualified to be President to begin with. Obama’s qualifications are the issue here.
“Been kicked out of every court this comes into to.”
You are behind the times. Court date has been set for January.
Yep. The presidency is a serious position with serious responsibilities. That job is above “games” and Obama proves daily that he’s not the right man for the job.
Thank you for your useless contribution.
Darn! I know. I always get those three guys mixed up!
Sic James O’Keefe and Hannah Giles on hin.
OK, Archbishop. Your flock will start by ceasing to contribute to your church. The Queen won’t give you anything, either.
I think Ehrlich is still alive. He needs to set an example by assuming room temperature.
Ehrlich is starting to look like Foster Brooks. He's never made as much sense as Brooks, though.
“... the DNC Leadership who will be under the criminal investigation microscope for the cover-up, and it is a scrutiny they cannot withstand. “
This is the meat of the matter. It goes right into Chicago..and the Daley Machine. It is fraud.
IMHO...the Daly’s are arrogant enuff to try to bluff the country...and have enuff to lose to get a little frisky if things aren’t going their way. Rahm is the Daly man...
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.