Posted on 10/14/2009 4:07:52 PM PDT by bkopto
...There is an Usurper in the White House, and his name is Barack Obama. He and those who aided him in this usurpation, including the DNC are guilty of Treason to the United States. Every law that has been passed, every treaty signed, every order issued to the military has zero legal weight.
This leads to a singularly terrifying reality that must be dealt with. The United States does not have a constitutional government....
Bookmarking
Just when you thought this was going away.
Soon we’ll get the usual suspects posting replies about how every attempt to get to the truth is a distraction and/or a waste of time and every lawyer that’s making an effort is somehow an idiot and blah blah blah.
But the one thing we’ll never see from those usual suspects is something constructive and proactive to be helpful in trying to get to the truth of the matter.
Tomorrow I’m going to get Judge Carter’s home address and send him a gift basket with a card that says that the American people love our country and simply want (and deserve) to know the truth. Whatever the truth may be.
I won’t put anything in there that could even be remotely considered a threat because that would be wrong and counterproductive, but I will encourage him to please think about what’s best for the country and what’s the “right” thing to do. Realistically, all he has to do is allow for discovery and let Taitz and Donofrio and others carry things forward from there.
As I’ve said before, If Obama’s legit, I’ll recognize him as my president. Until it’s proven, he’s nothing more than a usurper.
Outstanding image with article:
http://image3.examiner.com/images/blog/EXID7715/images/liberty_lost.jpg
I’d love a calculation of how much FR bandwidth has been wasted on this topic.
screw off - did you even read the article - Hawaii has painted itself into a corner
Apparently Jim Robinson doesn’t think it is a waste, otherwise he would have deleted all of these threads. Anyway, many of us are paying for the privilege of ‘wasting’ the bandwidth.
This is a scandal and cover-up 100 times the size of Watergate. This time, it won’t be just a President resigning in disgrace, it will also be the DNC Leadership who will be under the criminal investigation microscope for the cover-up, and it is a scrutiny they cannot withstand. "
NOW, this is getting interesting. I so love fire works. And Speaker Pelosi so deserves punishment.
Oh come on! How many threads have there been where there is some big break and we’re really close or some other nonsense.
This is like Clinton’s rape charge. Probable but unprovable. Unless a candidate running against him demands proof this is going nowhere.
Read the freakin’ article you fool. Disprove the article if you have the intellectual firepower.
Go figure.
Paul 544, the Obama troll is back !!
Where are those PPP polls or do you promote the Daily KOz propaganda this week !
Paul544 is a DU troll .
...Let’s first start with what it takes to keep the cacophony of silence and complicit cover-up silent and covered up.
Joan Swirsky writes that Douglas Hagmann, in an interview with Dr. Laurie Roth, revealed, “The reason for the media blackout about [Obama’s] birth-certificate issue was nothing less than organized Mafia-like dire threats to members of the media, issued not only from the heads of major TV and radio stations, but also from Federal Communication Commission officials. According to Hagmann and [his investigative partner] Judi McCleod, who conducted a nine-month investigation and documented their findings scrupulously,” threats were made to fire major talk-show hosts if they mentioned Obama’s birth certificate, threats were made by FCC officials to yank broadcasting licenses, and memos were circulated by corporate TV headquarters to all on-air employees advising them not to mention the birth-certificate issue, his lawyer’s license or his college records.
According to Swirsky, during the interview Hagmann and McCleod alluded to e-mails and other evidence in their possession — copies of which, they said, were secreted in several locations.
But the question that begs answering is: Why go to such lengths to keep documents away from public scrutiny? The birth-certificate issue is only a critical problem if, as many believe, it contradicts Obama’s citizenship story. And why prevent access to college records or restrict inquiry concerning his law license?
An even more pressing question is: How does a person like Obama — a nobody from nowhere — come to command such power and money so as to pull this off? Think about what it takes for a presidential candidate, and now sitting president, to have such power.
The answer can only be that Obama is the front man for something far more sinister. One person, without the strength and backing of a cabal capable of toppling governments and affecting worldwide currencies, etc., could not even consider such an undertaking, much less pull it off.
Ergo, the logical conclusion must then be that behind Obama there exists a group or organization so powerful and so sinister that they are able not just to influence global policy, but to control it. I repeat for the record, Obama in and of himself cannot, by any stretch of the imagination, singularly demand that every major media outlet ignore investigating that which could potentially make Woodward and Bernstein’s investigation into President Nixon pale in comparison...
http://www.theobamafile.com/ObamaLatest.htm
There is absolutely no doubt.
No doubt that it's nonsense. "Dual citizenship" was something our government didn't recognize. Maybe we still don't.
Woodrow Wilson would have been eligible for British citizenship because his mother was born in Scotland. Chester Arthur's Scots-Irish father would have made him eligible for British citizenship. Arguably, Herbert Hoover could have claimed Canadian citizenship, since his mother was born there. But the US didn't recognize such dual citizenship.
From 1855 to 1948 or so, a US law gave US citizenship to foreign women who married American men. So, apparently, Wilson and Hoover could claim that both their parents were US citizens at the time of their birth. But any claims foreign nations would have made that they such men were eligble for citizenship had nothing to do with the US law. We didn't recognize their claims.
I’d love for The One to be booted from office as ineligible. But I will be very surprised if this goes anywhere.
Hawaii will stonewall - obfuscate - deny - destroy records - issue fabricated exculpatory notes - have a friendly judge dismiss the whole thing. Whatever it takes.
I’m from Chicago. There, the law is something to control the suckers. I’m sure it’s much the same in Hawaii.
But, that’s just my opinion!
Great post, thanks.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
