Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

KEYES|BARNETT v OBAMA - 83 - MINUTES (IN CHAMBERS): ORDER by Judge David O. Carter: DENYING EX PARTE
Scrib ^ | 10/8/2009 | staff

Posted on 10/08/2009 3:50:20 PM PDT by kellynla

Click on link for document.

(Excerpt) Read more at scribd.com ...


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Crime/Corruption; Extended News; Government
KEYWORDS: eligibility; obama; potus
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-31 last
To: Candor7

Thank you for your reasoned response.


21 posted on 10/08/2009 5:17:05 PM PDT by Faith
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Non-Sequitur

“Sue the president and you sue the United States. The U.S. Attorney is the governments lawyer.”

Thank you for the information.


22 posted on 10/08/2009 5:37:41 PM PDT by Batman11 (Obama will dispatch skittle $hitting unicorns around the world to bring peace and prosperity to all!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: Faith

23 posted on 10/08/2009 5:56:37 PM PDT by Candor7 (The effective weapons against Fascism are ridicule, derision, and truth (Member NRA)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: Candor7

Now that is just too cute.


24 posted on 10/08/2009 6:16:42 PM PDT by Faith
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: Candor7

What the hell is that?! Is it flashing secret messages?


25 posted on 10/08/2009 6:24:58 PM PDT by tophat9000 (Obama plans to fix America like he fixed his dog)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: Lurking Libertarian

“He is being represented by the Civil Division of the U.S. Attorney’s Office.”

No, “he” is not being represented by the Civil Division of the U.S. Attorney’s Office.

Orly Taitz made her case about Obama, Pelosi, Clinton, and by doing so, makes it a case against the US Government. Had she only made a case against Obama, he would have had to retain very expensive and highly experienced, personal attorneys, but the case might have been over by now, or underway.


26 posted on 10/08/2009 7:43:03 PM PDT by BorderRaven (Vote for Chelene Nightingale and Save California!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: Lurking Libertarian

She would be the official in charge of making a government to government request for an authenticated copy of a Kenyan birth certificate. Why there would be a deposition of her when she has not in fact done that is my question.

What was the justification for an ex parte request to move into the discovery? Was there such an emergency that the other side could not be given notice of the hearing?


27 posted on 10/08/2009 9:19:28 PM PDT by LachlanMinnesota
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Lurking Libertarian

There were some reports that Hillary during her primary campaign had a suspicion about Obama’s eligibility.

If that is the case, then Hillary’s testimony would be relevant.

I think Orly is over the target and that is why more and more propaganda smears are being made about her character. AFAIK she lived under the Soviet system, saw the curruption and lies, and now she is seeing it played out here. So she is passionate about her crusade.

I will never blame Orly for doing what she is doing. I blame Obama for this conflict, a conflict that he could resolve within a day by authorizing the release of his goddam long form birth certifigate.


28 posted on 10/08/2009 10:25:37 PM PDT by Hostage
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Hostage
I blame Obama for this conflict, a conflict that he could resolve within a day by authorizing the release of his goddam long form birth certifigate.

If you read Orly's case you'll see that she doesn't care about his birth certificate. She alleges to have two different "Kenyan" BCs that prove he was foreign born but goes on to say that even if he was born in Hawaii, it doesn't matter. He's still ineligible by virtue of his Kenyan father. Orly is essentially demanding that Obama resign.

29 posted on 10/08/2009 10:59:12 PM PDT by Drew68
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: Hostage; Candor7; LucyT; All
If he allows the case to go forward, Obama's lawayers will be in appeals court the same day motioning to dismiss based on lack of standing.

Unfortunately, that would be the infamous "Ninth Circus," to borrow a joke from Rush Limbaugh.

One positive thought, though: It's difficult to see how they can rule that a military officer (faced with the real possibility of receiving orders from a commander in chief whose constitutional qualifications for POTUS are in dispute here, and who has pledged under oath to follow the Constitution) does NOT have standing to ask a federal court for this issue to be resolved.

30 posted on 10/09/2009 9:40:20 AM PDT by justiceseeker93
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: justiceseeker93
One interesting public policy argument. The uncertainty of Obama's bona fides wull inpact recruiting for our all volunteer military and negatively impact our security.

I'd say we can expect to see a radical decline in recruiting because of it.

31 posted on 10/09/2009 11:39:02 AM PDT by Candor7 (The effective weapons against Fascism are ridicule, derision, and truth (Member NRA)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-31 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson