To: SaraJohnson
Okay, who reported bam bams birth Not relevant to his eligibility.
and what proof did they offer to the State and was it acceptable to the state?
What a stupid question. Since they registered his birth, it follows the proof was acceptable to the state. Duh.
To: curiosity
Okay, who reported bam bams birth
Not relevant to his eligibility.
Sure it is revelant. Since you know everything, just tell us? What hospital did it come from?
To: curiosity; rxsid; Fred Nerks; null and void; stockpirate; george76; PhilDragoo; Candor7; GOPJ; ...
What a stupid question. Since they registered his birth, it follows the proof was acceptable to the state.
|
NO, not ACCEPTED by the State Registrar, like these:
Rather merely by the local Registrar:
If you take that "fact" and add in that Obama's Birth Record INDEX states "Groom/Bride" vs "Father/Mother",
it's obvious something is being hidden on the ABBREVIATED "Certification of Live Birth".
1,150 posted on
10/08/2009 1:54:31 PM PDT by
BP2
(I think, therefore I'm a conservative)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson