To: curiosity; rxsid; Fred Nerks; null and void; stockpirate; george76; PhilDragoo; Candor7; GOPJ; ...
What a stupid question. Since they registered his birth, it follows the proof was acceptable to the state.
|
NO, not ACCEPTED by the State Registrar, like these:
Rather merely by the local Registrar:
If you take that "fact" — and add in that Obama's Birth Record INDEX states "Groom/Bride" vs "Father/Mother",
it's obvious something is being hidden on the ABBREVIATED "Certification of Live Birth".
1,150 posted on
10/08/2009 1:54:31 PM PDT by
BP2
(I think, therefore I'm a conservative)
To: BP2
This has already been debunked. State bureaucrats just changed the terminology in the early 2000's.
To: BP2
It is useless to argue with the DU trolls. No matter what you say or proof you have they ignore it.
IT IS A WASTE OF TIME.
1,162 posted on
10/08/2009 2:06:22 PM PDT by
stockpirate
("I came NOT to bring peace but a sword." - Jesus Christ)
To: BP2
1,648 posted on
01/13/2010 12:29:39 PM PST by
rolling_stone
(no more bailouts, the taxpayers are out of money!)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson