Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

News from Alan Keyes: Judge Confirms Eligibility Trial to Proceed
AIPNews.com ^ | October 7, 2009 | Alan Keyes

Posted on 10/07/2009 11:23:53 AM PDT by EternalVigilance

By Alan Keyes
October 7, 2009
Loyal to Liberty

 

I just received a call from Orly Taitz, my attorney in the case seeking proof of Obama's eligibility for the Office of President of the United States. Judge Carter has released a statement declaring that the dates he set for the hearing and trial on the eligibility issue are confirmed, and it will move forward as scheduled. Apparently he was not swayed by the Obama lawyer's arguments.

Loyal to Liberty ...


TOPICS: Announcements; Constitution/Conservatism
KEYWORDS: birthcertificate; birthers; certifigate; judgecarter; keyes; lawsuit; naturalborn; obama; orlytaitz; usurper
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 741-760761-780781-800 ... 1,641-1,648 next last
To: faucetman

Vattel and Blackstone were the basis of the legal education for those who WROTE the Constitution. ALL of them. They DEFINED the terms used in the document. McCain is as eligible as anyone who ever ran for the office.


761 posted on 10/08/2009 3:39:45 AM PDT by arrogantsob
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 321 | View Replies]

To: altair

Because the election (involving hundreds of offices and thousands of candidates) was not fraudulent. An ineligible candidate does not make an entire election fraudulent. There is no use of such a term within the Constitution which calls for an election every four yrs. There is no provision for a do-over. People are not reading the constitution and are allowing their fantasies to take charge.


762 posted on 10/08/2009 3:45:08 AM PDT by arrogantsob
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 339 | View Replies]

To: thecodont

I hope so - it will take many to make those in power understand the “We the people ...........”.


763 posted on 10/08/2009 3:46:26 AM PDT by Lundy_s Lane II
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 635 | View Replies]

To: freekitty

I believe in the Constitution - I do not see how it can be interpreted any other way. But agree this situation is almost a first. Chester Arthur came close.


764 posted on 10/08/2009 3:48:21 AM PDT by Lundy_s Lane II
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 650 | View Replies]

To: MilspecRob

Well I believe she is right and if she is not winning then she needs other lawyers and the rest of us to help her.


765 posted on 10/08/2009 3:50:06 AM PDT by Lundy_s Lane II
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 710 | View Replies]

To: TheBigJ

So you are implying that the President is above the law, or the fight is too difficult.

I do not buy into we deserve this so have to suffer the consequences.


766 posted on 10/08/2009 3:53:07 AM PDT by Lundy_s Lane II
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 646 | View Replies]

To: Hostage

There is no claim by or expectation from me that Joe would be a successful or popular president or would not damage the Democrats should he succeed Urkle. But there is a constitutional method whereby this dilemna would be solved and the American people have nothing to say about it unless it amends the Constitution to allow special elections. While that is not impossible I see no activity pushing for such a thing.

Under our constitution as it stands Congress will have the final say on what happens and the Democrats happen to control it. While there is some debate about this it appears to me that the XX amendment governs.


767 posted on 10/08/2009 3:58:59 AM PDT by arrogantsob
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 356 | View Replies]

To: mlo
I hope Judge Carter gets that ruling out soon. This is getting boring.

He'll rule when he rules. And then it'll get interesting watching the Birther community explain it all away.

768 posted on 10/08/2009 4:01:04 AM PDT by Non-Sequitur
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 694 | View Replies]

To: danamco
Is that what DoJ (Aporn) teaches you???

Entertainment is a natural occurrence. It's what happens when you sit back and watch people make fools out of themselves.

769 posted on 10/08/2009 4:02:37 AM PDT by Non-Sequitur
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 704 | View Replies]

To: etraveler13

Your post is almost all incorrect. There is NO way Bush would ever be president again for starters.

Fraud does not equal “treason” either.


770 posted on 10/08/2009 4:05:52 AM PDT by arrogantsob
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 402 | View Replies]

To: American Constitutionalist
If the judge really wanted to pass the case onto the next court and kick the can down the road, wouldn’t he have just dismissed the case right then and there on Monday ?

He held a hearing on Monday and allowed both sided to make their case through oral arguments. If at the end he'd pulled out his ruling and issued it then it would make the whole process seem like a waste. Having heard what everyone has to say it's only right that he take time to craft his response. You have to give Judge Carter credit. Whatever his final decision is, it's clear he's not taken the case lightly and has done everything he could to ensure he has all the information he needs to issue a fair ruling.

771 posted on 10/08/2009 4:07:12 AM PDT by Non-Sequitur
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 754 | View Replies]

To: American Constitutionalist
How about Dick Cheney ?

His term ended at noon. At that moment he dropped out of the line of succession.

772 posted on 10/08/2009 4:11:11 AM PDT by Non-Sequitur
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 750 | View Replies]

To: jcsjcm

Those who were here 14 yrs prior to the ratification were also eligible to be president though not natural born as per
Article II, Section 4. Of course, that window of exception has closed.


773 posted on 10/08/2009 4:25:31 AM PDT by arrogantsob
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 494 | View Replies]

To: altair

Those pushing this absurd view are doing great damage to the case against Urkle knowingly or not is unclear. There are so many lies and mistatements such as this that most people are discouraged from even looking into this matter.


774 posted on 10/08/2009 4:29:18 AM PDT by arrogantsob
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 499 | View Replies]

To: Non-Sequitur
"[W]here there is no law, there is no liberty; and nothing deserves the name of law but that which is certain and universal in its operation upon all the members of the community." --Benjamin Rush, letter to David Ramsay, 1788

775 posted on 10/08/2009 4:32:23 AM PDT by EternalVigilance (Darkness has no response to light, except to flee.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 771 | View Replies]

To: EternalVigilance
"[W]here there is no law, there is no liberty; and nothing deserves the name of law but that which is certain and universal in its operation upon all the members of the community." --Benjamin Rush, letter to David Ramsay, 1788

And I would not disagree with that a bit. But what we have here is a loophole in the law that Obama has driven his truck through. The solution is to close that loophole and not ignore the law in our haste to get to the malefactor.

776 posted on 10/08/2009 4:40:09 AM PDT by Non-Sequitur
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 775 | View Replies]

To: Non-Sequitur

If you can call an entire political and legal class ignoring their oaths to uphold and defend the Constitution a “loophole,” well, okay.


777 posted on 10/08/2009 4:46:59 AM PDT by EternalVigilance (Darkness has no response to light, except to flee.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 776 | View Replies]

To: EternalVigilance
If you can call an entire political and legal class ignoring their oaths to uphold and defend the Constitution a “loophole,” well, okay.

How are they not upholding the Constitution. The Constituton says that the President must be a natural-born citizen. Obama says he was born in Hawaii and so therefore he is qualified. What else are you expecting?

778 posted on 10/08/2009 5:30:15 AM PDT by Non-Sequitur
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 777 | View Replies]

To: Frantzie

It is totally wasting of time and none productive to dialog with the usurper’s leaches which only goal is distraction from the Constitutional eligibility. I am not taking his bait on 769!!!


779 posted on 10/08/2009 5:36:44 AM PDT by danamco
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 748 | View Replies]

To: Non-Sequitur

Proof. Duh. Obama is a well-known liar.


780 posted on 10/08/2009 5:37:11 AM PDT by EternalVigilance (Darkness has no response to light, except to flee.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 778 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 741-760761-780781-800 ... 1,641-1,648 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson