Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

News from Alan Keyes: Judge Confirms Eligibility Trial to Proceed
AIPNews.com ^ | October 7, 2009 | Alan Keyes

Posted on 10/07/2009 11:23:53 AM PDT by EternalVigilance

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 281-300301-320321-340 ... 1,641-1,648 next last
To: BP2; Sibre Fan

Once again you’re left off the Troll list. What are you doing wrong?


301 posted on 10/07/2009 1:57:10 PM PDT by Non-Sequitur
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 295 | View Replies]

To: BP2

Great troll sign you got there! Also, I read all the posts you pinged to me about Orly’s case in front of Carter and they were enlightening. Thanks.


302 posted on 10/07/2009 1:57:28 PM PDT by SaraJohnson
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 295 | View Replies]

To: All
Dr. Orly has put her life’s blood into this fight. SHE HAS MADE DEFENDING THE CONSTITUTION AND THE AMERICAN WAY OF LIFE A PERSONAL AMBITION, IN THE ABSENCE OF ANY CONSTITUTION LEADERSHIP FROM COWARDLY REPUBLICANS AND THE SCOTUS.

Dr. Orly is the ONLY one out there in the trenches EVERY day hitting Obama on multiple fronts and trying to bring him down. It is reported that she is more than $8,000 in debt from using her own funds for expenses in her flights across the U.S for interviews, speeches, serving papers and meeting with officials.

She has even gone to Isreal and Russia to spread the message about Obama’s inelgibility!

She states the case expertly, including the bc and natural born citizen aspect, when not abused by the U.S. state-controlled media.

http://www.israelnationalnews.com/News/News.aspx/132880

HELP HER!

PayPal:

http://www.orlytaitzesq.com/blog1/

Image and video hosting by TinyPic

303 posted on 10/07/2009 1:57:57 PM PDT by patriot08 (TEXAS GAL- born and bred and proud of it!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 301 | View Replies]

To: ridesthemiles
The suit is against NObama- a person- not the USA.

If you sue the president then you sue the United States.

304 posted on 10/07/2009 1:58:30 PM PDT by Non-Sequitur
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 254 | View Replies]

To: SaraJohnson

My point was merely about the mechanism for filling Urkle’s place not the viability or longevity of a Biden presidency. You are undoubtably correct about the view people would have of him, those that care at all.


305 posted on 10/07/2009 1:58:31 PM PDT by arrogantsob
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 287 | View Replies]

To: OldDeckHand

This is an honest question, and I’m not claiming to know ANYTHING about legal matters, so please don’t be condescending. I think what most people are wondering is why the judge would make the trial dates “final”, instead of leaving them “tentative”, if he is still undecided on the motion to dismiss. Perhaps you can explain the legal reason for this entry into the record in a way that will answer this question for people.


306 posted on 10/07/2009 1:59:35 PM PDT by Cherokee Conservative (Democrats - They can lose any war, no matter how backward and braindead the enemy)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 111 | View Replies]

To: ridesthemiles

That’s not true. The EO he signed was referring to Presidential records only, not personal records of Presidents.


307 posted on 10/07/2009 2:00:20 PM PDT by autumnraine (You can't fix stupid, but you can vote it out!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 233 | View Replies]

To: Non-Sequitur
"Three guesses on what Mr. DeJute and Mr. West’s reply will be."

After they finish rolling on the floor, I wish they'd post it. I suspect Orly won't. :-)

308 posted on 10/07/2009 2:01:00 PM PDT by mlo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 296 | View Replies]

To: patriot08

Please. She’s nut job. Don’t give her your money.


309 posted on 10/07/2009 2:02:00 PM PDT by mlo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 299 | View Replies]

To: shotdog; All

****NOTE TO ALL:

If I go to

http://www.orlytaitzesq.com/?p=4727

using Explorer, it’s fine.

It freaks on Firefox.


310 posted on 10/07/2009 2:02:56 PM PDT by STARWISE (The Art & Science Institute of Chicago Politics NE Div: now open at the White House)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 130 | View Replies]

To: EternalVigilance

Yay!!!! Fireworks!!!! Snoopy dance!!!


311 posted on 10/07/2009 2:03:51 PM PDT by DirtyHarryY2K (The Tree of Liberty is long overdue for its natural manure)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mlo

Go back to the muzzie...and don’t forget your kneepads.


312 posted on 10/07/2009 2:04:45 PM PDT by patriot08 (TEXAS GAL- born and bred and proud of it!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 309 | View Replies]

To: rolling_stone; Candor7; LucyT

COURT ORDER FINALIZES SCHEDULE FOR TRIAL!
by John Charlton

(Oct. 7, 2009) — Today was published the Court order resulting from the Oct. 5th hearing in Barnett vs. Obama, issued by federal judge, David O. Carter, in the Southern Division of California.

The order, reads as follows:

On September 8, 2009, the Court previously set tentative case management dates. The Court now orders those dates be made final.

Case Management dates are as follows:

Motion for Summary Judgment Hearing — December 7, 2009, at 8:30 a.m.
File Motion for Summary Judgment — November 16, 2009
Opposition to Motion for Summary Judgment — November 26, 2009
Reply to Motion for Summary Judgment — November 30, 2009
Final Pretrial Conference — January 11, 2010, at 8:30 a.m.
Jury Trial — January 26, 2010, at 8:30 a.m.

October 7, 2009 4:49 PM


313 posted on 10/07/2009 2:05:00 PM PDT by MestaMachine (One if by land, 2 if by sea, 3 if by Air Force 1.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 300 | View Replies]

To: patriot08
Just sent her some :)

Also, see Post 295

314 posted on 10/07/2009 2:05:15 PM PDT by BP2 (I think, therefore I'm a conservative)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 299 | View Replies]

To: Sibre Fan
Please note the following from the court document:

"On September 8, 2009, the Court previously set tentative case management dates. The Court now orders those dates be made final. Case Management dates are as follows: Motion for Summary Judgment Hearing December 7, 2009, at 8:30 a.m.

File Motion for Summary Judgment November 16, 2009 Opposition to Motion for Summary Judgment November 26, 2009 Reply to Motion for Summary Judgment November 30, 2009 Final Pretrial Conference January 11, 2010, at 8:30 a.m. Jury Trial January 26, 2010, at 8:30 a.m. 3 : 21 01 Initials of Preparer kh Case 8:09-cv-00082-DOC-AN Document 81 Filed 10/05/2009 Page 1 of 1"

315 posted on 10/07/2009 2:05:18 PM PDT by stockpirate ("I came NOT to bring peace but a sword." - Jesus Christ)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 271 | View Replies]

To: mlo
Please. She’s nut job. Don’t give her your money.

A fool and his money are soon parted. I read that somewhere.

316 posted on 10/07/2009 2:05:49 PM PDT by Non-Sequitur
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 309 | View Replies]

To: Non-Sequitur

“NUTS’.

Mr. West already made a reply to Dr. Taitz. His reply was one word...”Nuts”.

Which was the reply General Anthony Clement McAuliffe made to the Germans when they surrounded him and demanded his surrender.

“From: Charles Lincoln [mailto:charles.lincoln@rocketmail.com]
Sent: Wednesday, October 07, 2009 11:11 AM
To: Dejute, David (USACAC); West, Roger (USACAC)
Subject: Dr. Taitz seeks stipulation re: Discovery.
Dear Messers DeJute & West:
Dr. Taitz has asked me to ask you whether you are willing to stipulate that, now that the Scheduling Order has been made final, rather than moot, that it is now time for us to begin discovery. We need to start sending out notices of deposition duces tecum to parties and subpoenas duces tecum to non-parties. The Judge specifically said that the Scheduling order would only be important if the case were going to go forward, and he seems to have spoken on this point.
Charles E. Lincoln, Research Associate & Law Clerk for Dr. Taitz, Esq., Attorney for the Plaintiffs.
Deo Vindice
“May the Lord God be with you,
and with thy spirit!”
My assistant, Mr. Lincoln has contacted Roger West, assistant US attorney, lead attorney representing the defendants, asking to stipulate to discovery in light of today’s order by Judge Carter. You can see his polite and constructive response “Nuts”. I wonder, if I wasn’t a woman, if I was a part of good old boys club, would there be a more appropriate response.”


317 posted on 10/07/2009 2:05:54 PM PDT by MrLuigi (incompetence)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 296 | View Replies]

To: ridesthemiles

I wonder how this fraud can stand himself....you’d think he’d be living in fear of being found out....him, his wife and the people who engineered this heist.


318 posted on 10/07/2009 2:06:07 PM PDT by Aria ( "The US republic will endure until Congress discovers it can bribe the public with the people's $.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 233 | View Replies]

To: BP2
Thank you. It's an honor to be included in your lovely, albeit low-tech, graphic.

Let the tomato-hurling begin!

319 posted on 10/07/2009 2:06:19 PM PDT by browardchad ("Everyone is entitled to his own opinion, but not to his own fact" - Daniel P Moynihan)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 295 | View Replies]

To: Non-Sequitur
Once again you’re left off the Troll list. What are you doing wrong?

Yeah, and I was, too!

320 posted on 10/07/2009 2:07:07 PM PDT by Lurking Libertarian (Non sub homine, sed sub Deo et lege)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 301 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 281-300301-320321-340 ... 1,641-1,648 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson