Posted on 10/07/2009 11:23:53 AM PDT by EternalVigilance
By Alan Keyes
October 7, 2009
Loyal to Liberty
I just received a call from Orly Taitz, my attorney in the case seeking proof of Obama's eligibility for the Office of President of the United States. Judge Carter has released a statement declaring that the dates he set for the hearing and trial on the eligibility issue are confirmed, and it will move forward as scheduled. Apparently he was not swayed by the Obama lawyer's arguments.
Well, if you look at the top of the birth announcements page, it indicates that data are received directly from the health department.
That's compared to Obama's newspaper birth announcement which is likely a "vanity" birth announcement, paid for by his mother or grandmother.
No it is not. It says right at the top of the page that the birth announcements are from the health department.
That in and of itself is a big problem for Obama's newspaper birth announcement, as Obama's birth record was merely FILED by the local Registrar, not ACCEPTED by the State Registrar.
Meaningless bureaucratic change in COLB terminology. COLB's printed since the early 2000's say "filed." Those printed before say "accepted."
Further, if notification ONLY came from the State of Hawaii Registrar, there would be newspaper birth announcements for the Nordyke twins whose birth certificates were ACCEPTED by the State Registrar ... born within 18 hours of Obama's purported birth at the same hospital.
How do you know there aren't such announcements? Did you actually go to the library in Honolulu and check the microfilm to see if they are there?
No it has not.
We know all that, that the illegal usurper has been "sneaked" into office as a total fraud with the help of a bunch of enablers in Congress, all the SoS, the judiciary branch and some powerful unknown powers outside this country, e.i award the Nobel price after two (2) weeks in office, hello!!
Try to explain that to the DoJ (Aporn) employee here who acts like they have Autism, ADD, ADHD and possible also Bi-Polar!!!
Excellent - clear as a silver bell - BTTT - everyone should read this.
Every time I do something at work I’m going to say, “think I can get a Peace Prize for that?”
Correction it is a “Piece Prize”
Of course not. However, you have not been officially knighted yet so we need to fix that.
I. Parsifal, Knight of the Grail, Defender of Virginity and Chastity, and Bane of Gooses, doth hereby dubbeth and annointeth Thee, Non-Sequitur, as a Knight of the Realm, with all rights and privileges pertaining thereto, including but not limited to, the slaying of strawmen, stalking horses, and dragons of various sorts, and bestoweth upon Thee the Affirmative Duty to seek out Untruth, in whatever form it may appear, and kicketh it in its hindparts. Arise, Sir Non-Sequitur!
parsy, who waves his sword around and mutters arcane words
I might add, however, that there is an additional possibility for fraud in relation to the birth announcements, one that was suggested by Polarik:
It could be that the Obama birth announcements were created at a much later date and pasted over the original newspaper copies on microfilm or microfiche to make it appear as if they were within the original newspaper listings when in fact they were not.
As most are well aware, Vattel was used by the framers of the constitution as a reference, hence the entry into the constitution:
What amazes me is that the “Obamabots” out there actually think that is they state that it does not exist, often enough, to enough people, it will simply not exist???
Not so, it is my fervent hope that it will never will happen.
So Sibre Fan. Want to drop the hammer now?
Nobody has even implied that they used Vattels words verbatem. It was a reference text. The constitution in its final form is what it is. The text is clear and unambiguous.
Accept it.
??????????????????????
Then where did the idea that a natural-born citizen was one with a U.S. citizen father come from if not Vattel?
Oh, gee-whiz...perhaps the minds of our Founding Fathers???
C’mon N-S....your smarter than these questions....
oops - i left out a point of the logic, previously used:
John Jay recommended the insertion of the NBC clause, as shown in his letter.
John Jay read Vattel.
Vattel referenced the NBC term.
Therefore, John Jay was intending to adopt Vattel’s theory of citizenship.
John Jay’s recommended insertion was adopted.
Therefore, the adopted version was based on Vattel’s theory.
Except John Jay couldn’t have gotten the term from Vattel, because the term did not exist in Vattel’s work at that time.
But I accept that there may be another theory.
Yes it has!!!
The whole Vattel argument doesn't wash anyway. If you keep reading Vattel you'll find a couple of sections down that he points out the rules in England are different. He wasn't talking about ENGLISH Common Law.
Indeed, the framers of the constitution, IMO, realized that the writings of Vattel applied to another country, and other political processes, my guess...they left those countries because of their oppression...taking this into consideration, and looking for checks and balances, they saw that the Presidential position could only be held by a Natural Born Citizen with natural born parents, to assure loyalty only to America, except as stipulated as the country began.
Again, JMO
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.