News from Alan Keyes: Judge Confirms Eligibility Trial to Proceed

AIPNews.com ^ | October 7, 2009 | Alan Keyes

[EternalVigilance]

By Alan Keyes
October 7, 2009
Loyal to Liberty

 

I just received a call from Orly Taitz, my attorney in the case seeking proof of Obama's eligibility for the Office of President of the United States. Judge Carter has released a statement declaring that the dates he set for the hearing and trial on the eligibility issue are confirmed, and it will move forward as scheduled. Apparently he was not swayed by the Obama lawyer's arguments.

Loyal to Liberty ...

[BP2]

The checks and balances are provided by the other two branches of government, as my
seventh grade civics class taught me.

If you go back and look at the research, the Checks and Balances as debated by the
state legislatures and delegates in 1787, extended beyond what the text books boiled
down and the teachers spoon fed to you when you were 16 years old.

   
       +----------------------+               :\:/:                             
       +  PLEASE DO NOT FEED  +            .:\:\:/:/:.            
       |THE ELIGIBILITY TROLLS|           :.:\:\:/:/:.:           
       |   mlo, browardchad   |          :=.' -   - '.=:          
       |OldDeckHand, curiosity|          '=(\ 9   9 /)='          
       |     Non-Sequitur     |             (  (_)  )             
       |                      |             /`-vvv-'\             
       +----------------------+            /         \            
                 |  |        @@@          / /|,,,,,|\ \           
                 |  |        @@@         /_//  /^\  \\_\          
   @x@@x@        |  |         |/         WW(  (   )  )WW          
   \||||/        |  |        \|           __\,,\ /,,/__           
    \||/         |  |         |          (______Y______)          
/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\//\/\\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\
==================================================================

   
       +----------------------+               :\:/:                             
       +  PLEASE DO NOT FEED  +            .:\:\:/:/:.            
       |THE ELIGIBILITY TROLLS|           :.:\:\:/:/:.:           
       |   mlo, browardchad   |          :=.' -   - '.=:          
       |OldDeckHand, curiosity|          '=(\ 9   9 /)='          
       |     Non-Sequitur     |             (  (_)  )             
       |                      |             /`-vvv-'\             
       +----------------------+            /         \            
                 |  |        @@@          / /|,,,,,|\ \           
                 |  |        @@@         /_//  /^\  \\_\          
   @x@@x@        |  |         |/         WW(  (   )  )WW          
   \||||/        |  |        \|           __\,,\ /,,/__           
    \||/         |  |         |          (______Y______)          
/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\//\/\\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\
==================================================================

[mlo]

[Vendome]

Great post and illustrates there is in fact a definition of NBC.

I had considered writing regarding this but your post Exactly explains the construct of Constitutional requirements.

Thanks.

[azkathy]

You know, I have wondered if the reason Obama hasn’t ordered more troops could have something to do with this eligibility issue.

Reason being, if he is proven to be a fraud, and sent troops into harms way and say one of them got killed, would he be guilty of murder? Knowingly putting someone in the line of fire when he wasn’t eligible to do so. Would that be considered “pre-meditated”?

[Non-Sequitur]

And yet you are here too!

The entertainment value provided by you and your fellow Birthers is worth the search.

[mlo]

"Great post and illustrates there is in fact a definition of NBC."

Nobody said there wasn't one. That's not in dispute. Nor is it in dispute that the framer's had a reason for putting it in.

[stockpirate]

Obama is a socialist scumbag that is hellbent on destroying our country with the help of people just like you.

He isn’t NBC.

[Vendome]

Au Contrare’ The other side says it has never been a definition and that is a kinda sort a thing.

[Vendome]

Uh, Yeah. I experienced that last night. A friend spouted off some praise of Barry O. and then I chimed in laughing with facts in opposition to their Idol.

Guess what? I was told “Don’t go there”. Even by her husband a strident Republican. Just dumb the way married couples sometimes move in lock step.

Then again, I am not married.

I am also not a chalkboard where you get to say all you want and I am suppose to take in all your inaccurate and vainglorious blather.

When two people are in the same room, you have to be adult enough to accept a conversation.

Otherwise, there is going to less reason for us to be in the same room.

[mlo]

"Au Contrare’ The other side says it has never been a definition and that is a kinda sort a thing."

A subset of Birthers says that. Most Birther critics do not. We point out that the definition is, citizen by birth.

[Non-Sequitur]

Obama is a socialist scumbag that is hellbent on destroying our country with the help of people just like you.

He doesn't need my help to do that.

He isn’t NBC.

He isn't CBS or ABC or CNN either.

[Non-Sequitur]

If you go back and look at the research, the Checks and Balances as debated by the state legislatures and delegates in 1787, extended beyond what the text books boiled down and the teachers spoon fed to you when you were 16 years old.

So you were 16 years old in 7th grade? That explains a lot.

Still I know the concept of checks and balances if far more complex than outlined in elementary school civics. But I was trying to keep it at the appopriate level for my audience.

[stockpirate]

Well it appears to me that you are in fact helping him do exactly that.

[BP2]

The sycophants on the Left keep saying there is no commonly-accepted definition of "natural born Citizen" used by the Framers. Most of us have seen what Vattel had to say on the subject in "The Law of Nations" (NOTE: nativeS, citizenS, parentS):

Vattel's "The Law of Nations" is THE reference the Framers used to construct the
Declaration of Independence & US Constitution, as Ben Franklin reveals:

So SIGNIFICANT was "The Law of Nations" to our Founders that it was ONE of the
ONLY TWO books purchased by Congress for use in writing laws in the 1700s:

... There REALLY is no debate as to HOW the Framers,
many of whom were immigrants, defined "natural born Citizen", or
WHO the Framers turned to define "natural born Citizen" ...

[stockpirate]

You also shame the parsifil legend and the intent thereof.

But my guess is you feel no shame do you?

[IrishPennant]

GREAT POST...much thanks!!!

[Vendome]

simply by being born here or being born here of parents who are themselves citizens, having no allegiance to another nation?

[Non-Sequitur]

Well it appears to me that you are in fact helping him do exactly that.

And in your world any non-Birther is doing that.

[Sibre Fan]

Seeing that less than 25 percent of the public believes what newspapers and the rest of the MSM reports, forgive me if I don't believe that "Health Bureau Statistics" banner.

No forgiveness necessary. I just wanted to clarify that you, in fact, believe that the newspapers printed false information.


Prove that the DOH of Hawaii actually provided the information EXCLUSIVELY to newspapers, and in the manner described.

This is a great area of inquiry - maybe UIPA Request # 6 from Donofrio. If I were trying to discredit/impeach the veracity of the newspaper birth announcements, I would request from the DOH the following information: All Health Bureau Statistics information released to the Honolulu Advertiser and the Star-Bulletin, or all information to which the HHB permitted the newspapers access to in August 1961. DOH cannot claim that the information they provided to newspapers is confidential, so they would have to provide that info.

I'd also go back, or have someone go back, to both newspapers to get all the birth announcements printed during the Month of August.

Once I got that information, I'd take the HHB information and compare that to the reports printed in the newspapers that month.

(a) If I found any information from the HHB statistics that were not printed in the newspapers, that would show that the newspapers cannot be relied upon for full and complete HHB statistics information. E.g., where's the Nordyke twins birth announcement? That's a great question. The announcement containing Obama's birth does have announcements of other births on August 6. Why did that announcement not have the Nordykes? Did they appear in the next week's announcement? Or, were they just missed? And, if so, why were they missed? While that doesn't prove, or tend to prove that the Obama information is inaccurate, it does cast at least some doubt on the evidentiary value of the newspaper announcements.

(b) If, when I compared the HHB statistics information to what the newspapers printed, I found information printed in the newspapers that was not contained in the HHB Statistics, that would show that the newspapers cannot be relied upon as accurate HHB statistics reports. In other words, that would cast significant doubt on the evidentiary value of the newspapers announcements.

[stockpirate]

Par you intentionally mislead people.

You are typical of leftists.

What time do you report for work as a poster on FR?