Posted on 09/29/2009 9:01:39 AM PDT by SeekAndFind
When originally endeavoring to write an approximately 800-word opinion piece on Glenn Beck, I hadn’t taken into account what a truly difficult task it would be. I’ve no desire to alienate some of my many friends on the right currently embracing Beck. But I do have this terrible habit of usually speaking my mind. Glenn Beck deserves credit for what he is doing to hurt Obama — there is no question about that. But in thinking about the man overall as a media figure today, one allegedly aligned with the right, I also have serious concerns. I tried to do my best to address the topic fairly, and I regret that so complex a topic took me almost 1,800 words.
Given the down feeling across the right after last year’s elections, it’s almost exciting to watch Glenn Beck inject a new vitality into the nation’s political discourse. Nearly every one of Beck’s shows packs the respect, depth, sincerity, and intelligence of a good joke at a funeral parlor into one uproarious hour after another. I don’t know how anyone can keep from snickering … at least a little bit. So, what’s the harm in a good joke?
The harm as I see it is that so many seem to be taking the joke seriously. But can you blame them? No, probably not. The media culture of today has done everything in its power to prevent the right from seeing a serious, effective leadership emerge on the national stage. One need only look back to the recent — in fact, ongoing — mistreatment of Sarah Palin to demonstrate that. A deeply informed and experienced radio host, Mark Levin, has broken out in the radio world with ratings that make Glenn Beck’s real numbers look like the third tier radio host he actually is. Levin also wrote a significant New York Times bestseller, moving well over a million copies by now. But there was no Time cover, no Newsweek splash, no Katie Couric interview for that. Have you ever paused long enough to ask yourself why?
Full disclosure — yes, Mark Levin has become something of a dear and trusted friend. But please don’t mistake this as carping or defense on his behalf. Mark is the last person I know who needs or wants to be defended by someone else. My opinions in this matter have nothing to do with Levin and everything to do with the future of the right and the desperate need we have of winning a large number of state and district elections in 2010. And I am not suggesting that Glenn Beck should somehow shut up, go away, or stop pointing a finger at this out-of-control leftist White House whenever he can. Let’s be clear about that. What I am suggesting is that at least some relatively small but vocal amount of people are misunderstanding why Beck is getting the media exposure that he is.
In short, the elitist media gets the joke. They are not putting him up there because they find him an effective, articulate spokesman for the right. They find him an oddity, something they can pin prick and laugh at. And consciously or not, they also know he has the potential to do tremendous damage to the right while having accomplished very little if anything much at all to help it himself. And that’s a fact. He was given a non-prominent microphone and television show in a mostly uncompetitive time slot, replacing a very decent but relatively uncompelling and beyond-his-prime John Gibson. And piggybacking on the efforts of others, Beck has displayed tremendous marketing ability, or his handlers have, in making the absolute best use of it while also doing damage to a politically dangerous White House. He deserves praise and full credit for that.
However, we should not confuse what it is and what it is not, nor lose sight of the extremely dangerous time bombs he has planted for the right as he’s gone so thoughtlessly and carelessly on his way in doing it. First some facts as to what Beck has and has not actually done in terms of damaging the Obama administration. From the 9/12 tea party march, to Van Jones, the NEA scandal, and ACORN, none of these were the genuine work of Glenn Beck. He did no heavy lifting on any of those stories other than ginning up noise around them on his show, often milking them for days while, to genuine observers, all the facts were out there for anyone of a mind to find them out. That isn’t an insult. He has a television presence and it’s good that he’s currently using it to capitalize on stories that help the right and undermine Obama. I’m not begrudging him that.
But his attempt to co-opt the tea party movement with that silly 9/12 Project nonsense that never actually caught on was the most ham-fisted and perhaps only insulting one of them all. Nine principles and 12 values? Can anyone even name them today? They were supposed to be what it was all about once. Oh well, at least one of his marketing schemes hasn’t tracked, so we do know he’s human after all. The D.C. tea party protest was always planned to come off. All Beck did was come up with a scheme to weave into it, trying to make it his, and it failed. I know because I was there. Aside from whatever more rabid fans he may have encircled himself with for his broadcast that day, nothing about 9/12 was about Glenn Beck. The movement preceded him, just as it preceded Obama, having started under Bush. And frankly, getting off one’s duff and getting involved in local or state party politics or actively joining up with the tea party movement is the only thing that’s going to help take back America and set the Republican Party right for the center-right. In that sense, Beck is a distraction, if nothing else. But he is also something far worse. He’s a genuine danger to us and we need to sort that out.
Without taking credit away from Beck for talking it up as he did, along with many, many others, the notion that 9/12 was much about Beck is a joke. The many pushing it were simply more generous in crediting the people actually involved — the little people, patriotic Americans across the country like you and me who are driving it. They stand in stark contrast to Beck, who seems to ultimately and always be about himself. As for the real meat behind the various other scandals mentioned, it was either Breitbart or blogger Gateway Pundit who did the real work on those. Beck’s great contribution was again, like others, to broadcast them. That’s a good thing. He deserves credit for that, though also unfortunately he seems so willing to make them his own. I guess that’s what so-called stars, or wannabe famous people, do.
But what else has he done? This represents my only serious concerns involving Beck. Otherwise, I doubt I’d be much interested in him at all. He’s called Barack Obama a racist, for one. I’m appalled by my friends on the right who seem so willing to pass that remark off as insignificant — almost pretending it was never said. It was outrageous, undeserved, and represents nothing but the very kind of racist cudgel the left has been falsely charging the right with being for years. Maybe Beck is one, otherwise he could never conceive of making such a remark — and so publicly at that.
I thought Barack Obama wasn’t even “really” black to many of his critics? I thought the good friend he was “pal-ing around with,” domestic terrorist Bill Ayers, was white? In fact, Obama has probably broken bread with more white people than black over the years. And forget the nuance, the rationalization around what it is he really meant or was trying to say. That doesn’t and won’t matter when the left and the media pick it back up and turn it on you, not just Glenn Beck, to call you intolerant and racist, just as they have wrongly been doing for years.
So, Beck-heads, be advised. If nothing else, don’t come crying to me about how a biased media mistreats you and calls you names you don’t deserve to be called when they tire of the right’s alleged fair-haired boy and decide to use his recklessness and lack of thought against you. And they will do it not just to you, but the entire conservative movement because he was prominently embraced and not denounced. Well, not me. And I want to be very clear and on record here. The comment was uncalled for.
And what about those internment camps? That’s a good one. When the story first broke I looked into it. It took all of an hour to read the text of the actual bill and see there was nothing to it at all. Yet somehow it took Beck, all the while stirring up his would-be masses, a month to figure it out. Really? With his supposedly dogged researchers and researching skills? Please, give me a break. So there again Beck has planted the very seed that, just as Obama’s past with ACORN is currently doing to him, is going to come back and hurt the right to a significant degree. We’ll be denounced en masse as a bunch of wild-eyed conspiracy freaks and racists. And thanks to any broad embrace of Glenn Beck and the lowest common denominator of showmanship that he represents, this time you’ll deserve it.
I understand the center-right’s frustration. For some time the Republican Party has failed us, though it does now seem to be getting on track based upon my observations here in Washington, D.C. I know how frustrating it was to watch the unfair destruction of Sarah Palin. In that sense, dare I say, I feel your pain. And I share the desperation of wanting to find someone that the media allows to stand up, to not be maligned while honestly and fairly speaking to our issues and representing our various just causes such as they are. But I refuse to accept just anyone in that role because it’s too important to me.
And I especially refuse to accept someone so reckless, uninformed, unthinking, and possibly even unserious with a very real potential to do the right more harm than good in the end.
-- Dan Riehl is a former marketing professional in the technology industry turned blogger/new media consultant. He's based in Virginia, just off the D.C. Beltway.
You know, the last time I heard from someone who wanted me to take him and his opinions seriously, found out he was simply a guy *turned blogger*, it was that goof-ball, Perez Hilton.
I think a lot of people on our side (or even not on “our side”) cannot believe ANYONE would want communism or a dictator or a big-overly-powerful federal government.
A lot of us cannot understand the mentality of worshipping power hungry thugs.
But I do know A LOT of us are awake and ready to fight.
And DC, although they try to deny it, dang well knows it, too.
My point remains. Your loyalty should not be to one talker above another, so that you advertise your disdain in such an overt manner.
Each talk show person has his or her faults. They're all fallen human beings. And I'm guessing they all have pretty big egos.
But what they are ALL doing is pointing out the specifics of the battle we're in - the battle for the survival of America.
Don't take sides in petty arguments. Fight the enemy.
Elitist Republicans do not want Cpservatives to unify and take back the Republican PArty. And they will act to do the same to Palin as they attempt to do to Beck.
You will hear no apologies from us conservatives Mr Riehl about who we are and what we will do.We are coming for you. Take the back seat, or get out of the car and go join your progressive friends. You cannot shape us any more.
Beck has put forth his evidence, which is a lot more than most people in politics and the media do these days. I dont find it an unserious charge. I think it merits discussion.
Beck Explains 'Racist' Comment
Obama has made other comments that disturb me, such as his claim that fixing education and healthcare will disproportionately benefit the black community. I have to wonder about a president who thinks in terms of disproportionately benefitting one group over another.
I believe I also saw that clip on Beck's show, although it is not included in the above commentaries.
I like both of them.
After what Beck and Breitbart have uncovered about ACORN alone tells me that people who Criticize Beck are liberals themselves at best and communists at worst. Beck has done good work, I am a relative new watcher to Beck, having only been watching him for about 3 months, but see none of the “clownishness” that some attribute to him. He lays out his facts and presents them, yes, he uses a little drama sometimes but this only enhances the facts he is trying to get across.
But that concern didn't turn to FEAR under Bush---it turned to FEAR under Obama.
And who says a racist can't simultaneously have self-guilt? Some of the biggest "gay bashers" were . . . well, homosexuals.
What I do know is that Beck gets results that independently some of these other movements and or videos would NOT attract. No, he didn't start the Tea Party movement, but he did successfully publicize it. And his show kind of became the media vehicle for the movement.
I STRONGLY DISAGREE WITH BECK'S SILLY NOTION THAT "IT'S ABOUT BOTH PARTIES." IT IS NOT! There were no mass marches against Bush, not even against the bailouts. Bush's policies were bad, but they were not motivated by a hatred of America as are Obama's and the SOONER BECK GETS OFF THIS "BOTH PARTIES DO IT" CRAP, the more effective he will be.
Bingo!
Beck takes on serious subjects with, yes, bombasity, but his style of a serious/silly showman is just that. Beck is not the be-all-end-all and yet he is now not insignificant. While he plays himself as must-watch tv it is obvious that he knows that he is just one (now) heavyweight in a growing movement of center-right media that includes a potpouri of talent from Rush to Laura to Levin to Malkin to Coulter to....etc.
The only significant mistake he made IMO is to flatly say Obama is a racist in such a blunt way. The very same thing could have been said by highlighting Obama's belief in core affirmative action principles and then highlighting those programs/principles as race-based, ie., racist.
Exactly!
IMHO, the Beck/Levin comes down to this.
Levin wrote a defining book, one which will be remembered.
Levin is not an off-the-cuff guy, he’s a plodder, he works very hard for what he produces.
Levin is also a lawyer, so, as a professional, he can’t imagine not sighting source material.
Levin’s work has purposely been blacked out by the media, because they are justifiably threatened by it.
Beck is a showman.
While I agree with a lot of what Beck says he often says it in a manner so overdramatized that I find myself tuning out.
Beck also does subtly co-opt other people’s work.
This is just his manner and the way he conducts himself as a showman, right or wrong.
However, when Beck, the showman, subtly co-opts the work of Levin, the professional plodder, I can understand Levin becoming justifiably upset.
Levin’s work is pivotal and it is ignored.
Having someone with a microphone as big as Beck’s use that work and use it uncredited IS a big slap in the face.
If everyone is supposed to be on the same side then I would submit that it is upon Beck to invite Levin on his show and interview him about his book and how important it is.
If Beck does not do this then the people who consider him a loose canon in the movement are more correct than not.
Just my opinion.
Palin/Beck 2012
>I STRONGLY DISAGREE WITH BECK’S SILLY NOTION THAT “IT’S ABOUT BOTH PARTIES.” IT IS NOT!
I disagree. The Republican party has only given lip-service to its stated platform. In the past decade, wherein the Legislature and the Executive were Republican-majority, the only real progress on ending abortion (which is part of the stated platform) was the Mexico City policy — And that was just denying federal funds to be used on promoting foreign abortions. The stem-cell research ban on embryonics was merely holding the line.
Similarly, while the deployment of National Guard to the Southern border [Operation Jump Start] was a good first-step it is over now and NO additional ‘steps’ were taken.
Honestly, can you tell me based on actions/events what differentiates Republicans and Democrats when they had the power to be relevant?
Trust me, I’ve seen defeat snatched from the Jaws of Victory... the Republican party could EASILY do that, and it’s appearing moreso that the Democratic party can as well.
if you think that is “debunking” you are a lost soul, watch this http://www.campfema.com/ and tell me the camps are debunked, Beck is a banker tool, designer to lead the quoate un quote ‘right” to the slaughterhouse
The most important person behind a journalist is a good editor.
Don't take sides in petty arguments. Fight the enemy.
You may be in the battle for the world.
shalom b'SHEM Yah'shua HaMashiach
NAsbU Ephesians 6:12 For our struggle is not against flesh and blood,
but against the rulers, against the powers, against the world forces
of this darkness, against the spiritual forces of wickedness in the
heavenly places.
Riehl has the right to remain silent. But why does he feel that he is under arrest?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.