Posted on 09/28/2009 10:15:01 AM PDT by vikk
Attorney Orly Taitz, a national figure in the “birther” movement and lawyer for an Army captain who sought to stop her deployment to Iraq on arguments that President Barack Obama can’t legitimately hold office, has filed a motion to withdraw as the captain’s lawyer.
Taitz, who represents Capt. Connie Rhodes, filed her latest motion Saturday. It cites two court documents as reasons for withdrawing from the case — a Sept. 18 order from U.S. District Court Judge Clay Land threatening $10,000 in sanctions against Taitz and a letter purportedly signed by Connie Rhodes, which asks for Taitz to be removed as her attorney.
“In order to defend herself, the undersigned counsel will have to contest and potentially appeal any sanctions order in her own name alone, separately from the plaintiff, by offering and divulging what would normally constitute inadmissible and privileged attorney-client communications,” Taitz states. “The undersigned attorney will also offer evidence and call witnesses whose testimony will be adverse to her (former) client’s most recently stated position in this case.”
It appears, however, that Taitz didn’t sign her motion. Court records filed Monday state that the motion must be filed again because Taitz didn’t sign it.
Should we posters in the birther movement cease to point out these deceits from the obamanoids? Is there a limit to the misdriection deceit that will be tolerated at FR?
How about you point out what you consider to be the deceits and make your case on the open forum?
The poster exposed her bias for the obammy messiah by trying so hard to substantiate the fraud fabrciated from the original fraud posted then removed from the obammy website. The obamanoids want to create as much misdirection as they can with this tedious crap. It may be best to let it slide now ... the facts will be presented in court when the time comes. At FR, these cockroaches are a protected species for now.
And, supposedly? WTF do you think this is?
The Obama File copy of the Fight the Smears COLB
That's an image of a COLB that, if you tweak the Levels in Photoshop or GIMP, you can see signs of a notary seal above the date-stamp. As I said, the link previously provided to your website did not show a seal-less "first image," nor does this link you've provided.
And as I offered previously, if you'd like me to save a copy of the tweaked image showing this, I'd be happy to post it, with instructions on what Levels settings to use to recreate it yourself.
Beyond any of that. It is common courtesy to copy me, whenever you reference me or my website. Especially when you are posting lies.
I apologize for not copying you. I will endeavor to not make the same mistake in the future. But I have not lied, you have not identified anywhere where I have actually lied, and it is common courtesy not to accuse people of lying when they have not lied.
I don’t expect you to care that the first CoLB exhibit posted by the Obama website was a forgery with a telltale black spot int he upper left corner, and that the same fraud was then used to fabricate the exhibit LorenC and the rest of the obamanoid team working this thread want to ‘substantiate’. But if you were to become remotely interested, looking first to the exhibit at TheObamaFile.com which I linked to, then looking at the Israeli website link will answert any questions you might have regarding the efforts of the obamanoids to obfuscate and decdeive this forum.
Once again, make your case on the open forum and let the rest of FR decide for themselves. And quit both the name-calling and pinging the mods over your personal disagreements.
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2174774/posts?q=1&;page=201
To: MHGinTN
Suggest you work harder on your case and your arguments. If you can’t convince FReepers, guess you’ll never convince the rest of the country.
Also, suggest that you drop the rough language you’ve been using lately and the personal attacks on other FReepers.
Thanks
207 posted on Friday, January 30, 2009 4:50:54 PM by Jim Robinson
So now I cannot even post the link to the Beckwith more extensive material? Okay
Do you not understand?
Right now I'd just like to substantitate what this seal-less "first image" looks like. It's been cited several times in this thread, but it hasn't been posted, and it hasn't been linked to. On two occasions links have been provided to supposedly seal-less COLBs, which then upon inspection turned out to show signs of a seal. It's very hard for me and other readers to determine *what* it shows when nobody seems able to show it.
Meanwhile, you said that you have saved to your computer a screen capture of the original seal-less COLB as it appeared on Obama's site, but which you haven't shared with anyone. If it does in fact show a seal-less "first image," please share it.
As I stated previously, nowhere in that document does Steve show a seal-less "first image" as allegedly appeared on Obama's website. To the contrary, Steve's analysis focuses on the photos on Factcheck's website.
In fact, at the end of his piece, he claims that there was only *one* COLB posted on Fightthesmears (without a seal), not two (one with seal, one without) as stated in this thread. But he doesn't offer any images of the Fightthesmears image where he points out the supposed absence of a seal.
But if I missed it somehow, and there is a point in Steve's piece where he includes a copy of the seal-less "first image," please point it out to me.
The current resident of the Oval Office—occasionally there—is exactlyt what the democrat party criminal enterprise has lusted for lo these several decades. Now, they have the pins all lined up to fundamentally change America into the federal oligarchy of their wet dreams, so why would you believe these same criminal enterprise democrats would remove their chosen mutant from office?
Furthermore, all it would have taken is any ONE Republican Senator out of the current 40 Republican Senators combined with any ONE Republican Congressman or woman out of the 178 Republicans in the House to challenge Obama’s eligibility when the Electoral College votes were being certified and a mandatory investigation of his eligibility would have ensued. Not one Republican Senator out of 40 and not one Republican Representative out of 178 was willing to challenge the certification of Obama’s Electoral Votes with Vice President Cheney presiding over the joint sesion of Congress on January 8th.
It doesn’t take Democrats to charge Obama with forgery, there are plenty of Republican prosecutors in this nation and it only would have taken any two Republican members of Congress to challenge Obama’s eligibility to be certified as President by the Electoral College.
No Republican prosecutors and no Republican members of Congress have been willing to take him on.
Finally, conservative U.S. Supreme Court Justices Kennedy, Alito, Roberts and Scalia (as well as David Souter) have all had requests for Writs of Certiorari presented to them in conference by Leo Donofrio and Philip Berg. All those requests for a full hearing before the Supreme Court on issues related to Obama’s Natural Born Citizen status have been denied.
| Be wary of the being set up by professional pro-Obama bloggers who uses sophistry, asks you to prove everything they ask for, use multiple log-in names, and other techniques. They did the same thing to Hillary's campaign in 2007-8. See the movie "Blog Wars" for more insight on this from the 2004 campaign. If they were simple casual posters, they wouldn't be here trying to discredit these issues through logic circles and misdirection. Life's too short to try to convert people they think are “nut cases” - instead they are trying to dissuade new people who are just picking up on or are casually watching the Eligibility suits. I've caught on to other ones who pretend to be Conservative plants, trying to persuade readers to support Romney and other RINOs in 2010 and 2012. They're almost always PAID schills on a mission - in this case, trying to drive people away from Eligibility suit questions. See here for more: 17 Techniques for Truth Suppression 3. Characterize the charges as “rumors” or, better yet, “wild rumors.” If, in spite of the news blackout, the public is still able to learn about the suspicious facts, it can only be through “rumors.” (If they tend to believe the “rumors” it must be because they are simply “paranoid” or “hysterical.”) 4. Knock down straw men. Deal only with the weakest aspects of the weakest charges. Even better, create your own straw men. Make up wild rumors (or plant false stories) and give them lead play when you appear to debunk all the charges, real and fanciful alike. 12. Require the skeptics to solve the crime completely. E.g. If Foster was murdered, who did it and why? 17. Flood the Internet with agents. This is the answer to the question, “What could possibly motivate a person to spend hour upon hour on Internet news groups defending the government and/or the press and harassing genuine critics?” Don't the authorities have defenders enough in all the newspapers, magazines, radio, and television? One would think refusing to print critical letters and screening out serious callers or dumping them from radio talk shows would be control enough, but, obviously, it is not. |
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.