Attorney Orly Taitz files motion to withdraw as lawyer for Capt. Connie Rhodes

Columbus Ledger-Enquirer ^ | Sept. 28, 2009 | ALAN RIQUELMY

[curiosity]

LOL. You can't refute Loren's point that there was no COLB posted without a seal, so you post a long list of ad hominems.

Typical crackpot behavior.

[syc1959]

MHGinTN

First off you are wrong. The forged COLB image that was posted on FTS, has been seen in large format.

http://defendourfreedoms.org/COLB.jpg

There are three different versions of the COLB.

[BP2]

Typical crackpot behavior.

That would be #5 of the 17 Techniques for Truth Suppression - "crackpot" actually being the fifth label listed:

Call the skeptics names like “conspiracy theorist,” “nutcase,” “ranter,” “kook,” “crackpot,” and, of course, “rumor monger.” Be sure, too, to use heavily loaded verbs and adjectives when characterizing their charges and defending the “more reasonable” government and its defenders. You must then carefully avoid fair and open debate with any of the people you have thus maligned. For insurance, set up your own “skeptics” to shoot down.

Please prove that Obama didn't create another alias in 1996 in Illinois, when his driver's license record first indicates it was created in Illinois. He was married in October 1992 in Chicago -- the driver's license should indicate an earlier date than 1996.

[Red Steel]

Let me lay it out for you. A raised seal on the back of the document may not show up on the scan if the scan does not have sufficiently high resolution. Duh.

Gee, I wonder why the DailyKOS COLB was never re-imaged again for a quality picture from the front and the backside after all the criticism it takes?

I'll tell you why. The silly thing is unreal. Only an appearance. A shadow. An illusion. Nothing but a ghost of reality. A lie. A falsehood. A spectre without body.

It is ignored by Obama because it would perjure him in court, either that COLB from "Factcheck."org or that COLB at DailyKos.

[mojitojoe]

That’s why I haven’t been posting on the BC threads much. Obviously someone isn’t doing their job to rid these threads of the obvious organized teams of Obots. May be time to find another forum. Enough stress without dealing with hoards of trolls allowed to run rampant.
I don’t care how long they have been here, if they donate or whatever, if they don’t believe in the BC issue, they have no right to disrupt, name call, etc. Why spend hours arguing with other Freepers? WHY? Because they aren’t are Obots on the BC threads and they are here to take control of the conversation. It’s total BS!! I wonder if we all went over to a thread and all began to start arguments, call people idiots, etc. what would happen?

[LorenC]

First off you are wrong. The forged COLB image that was posted on FTS, has been seen in large format.

http://defendourfreedoms.org/COLB.jpg

Just like the one that MHGinTN linked to, and the one that Beckwith linked to, the signs of a seal are visible when you run this COLB jpeg through Photoshop or GIMP and adjust the Levels.

So the only seal-less FTS image continues to be the one that MHGinTN says is sitting on his hard drive.

[MHGinTN]

And no matter how much you taunt and bait, you are not going to get me to post that for you to deceive over. Deal with it, obot.

[MHGinTN]

BTW, it is a swcreen capture for Obama’s site, so you should have easy access to it already.

[syc1959]

I guess LorenC got tired of WND or transfered to another assignment.

LorenC

Obama’s COLB are forged and that is the simple fact.

There are some hidden facts that are about to come out.
Obama can’t hide from them.

Barack Obama is an undocumented illegal alien using forged papers.

http://nobarack08.wordpress.com
http://www.youtube.com/syc1959

[Red Steel]

Just like the one that MHGinTN linked to, and the one that Beckwith linked to, the signs of a seal are visible when you run this COLB jpeg through Photoshop or GIMP and adjust the Levels.

In a probably email to the Obama campaign back in June 2008:

DailyNut Markos Moulitsas - could you send us a better image of the Obama COLB, and from the backside too? The folds in the COLB don't show and what may be signs of a raised seal are nothing but distortions. We are taking withering criticism about it. So get us a better quality picture of it - please.

The Obama campaign's reply - Cricket cricket cricket cricket....

[LorenC]

Please prove that Obama didn't create another alias in 1996 in Illinois, when his driver's license record first indicates it was created in Illinois. He was married in October 1992 in Chicago -- the driver's license should indicate an earlier date than 1996.

What about that driving record indicates to you that the 1996 date represents when the record was first created? The column label is "CONT. LIC. DATE." I can't say for certain exactly what that stands for, but the most probable meaning is "Continuous License Date." I can't immediately think of any meaning of "CONT." that implies "first."

Obama first moved to Chicago in 1985. Licenses in Illinois last until your fourth birthday, so his first license would have expired in 1988. Then again in 1992 and 1996. See how the date given is "08/19/96"? Fifteen days AFTER his birthday? If that column means what I'm guessing it means, Obama's license ran out on his birthday, he simply didn't have a valid license for 15 days, and the "continuous" clock started running again when he obtained a new valid license.

After all, his 1992 Illinois marriage license gives his name as "Barack Hussein Obama."

[LorenC]

So your argument that Obama's COLB is a forgery includes asserting that he has posted both sealed AND seal-less COLBs to his website, but you can't point to any jpegs of the seal-less COLB.

You say that Obama replaced the original seal-less image with an image that had a seal, but now you're saying that I should look at Obama's website to see the seal-less image.

You say you have a copy of the seal-less image in your possession, but you're not going to show it.

I honestly don't see how it is considered "baiting" to ask you to produce evidence that you have said you possess, and which you have cited as proof in this thread of an argument you've made.

[LorenC]

BTW, it is a swcreen capture for Obama’s site, so you should have easy access to it already.

But as you said in post #359:

"It was his website which first posted a jpg image of a CoLB which lacked a raised seal. When that was called to their attention, they placed a raised seal on the first image and claimed that was then genuine."

So obviously if I just visit Obama's site, I'd be seeing this replacement image WITH a seal, and not one WITHOUT, as you have said once existed.

[Red Steel]

You're argument doesn't hold water.

When the DailyKOS forgery was made, the forger(s) didn't have an embossed stamp that looked like the Hawaiian seal. So the forger goes for second best. Create a ghost image underneath with barely visible distortions until a time that they could produce a facsimile of the Hawaiin raised seal.

Almost two months go by then in early August of 2008. The non-"Factchecker".org come out with their new and improved forgery. However, they still screw up the design of raised seal as seen below:

The Obama Hawaiian COLBs will never be seen in court to cover his @ss.

[curiosity]

Please prove that Obama didn't create another alias in 1996 in Illinois

More crackpot behavior. Make something up and then demand that someone else prove you wrong.

[Red Steel]

WHY? Because they aren’t are Obots on the BC threads and they are here to take control of the conversation. It’s total BS!! I wonder if we all went over to a thread and all began to start arguments, call people idiots, etc. what would happen?

The super trolls are Democrats and liberal socialists doing what they do best.

[curiosity]

Gee, I wonder why the DailyKOS COLB was never re-imaged again for a quality picture from the front and the backside after all the criticism it takes?

Because if they did that, you birthers would than claim that the reimaged document wasn't the same as the one posted earlier. Duh.

Instead they gave it to Factcheck to photograph, and on the photos the seal is there for all to see.

But of course, predictably, the birthers then go on to say that the Factcheck document isn't the same as the scanned document.

[MHGinTN]

As an obot we presume you will be allowed special access to whatever David Axelgreasy archives, so you should be able to access the first image your messiah placed on his campaign website, which is no longer available online as you already know. Your taunting and childish repeated baiting will not cause me to post for you the screen capture image I archived last summer.

[Red Steel]

Because if they did that, you birthers would than claim that the reimaged document wasn't the same as the one posted earlier. Duh.

That's one of the lamest excuses I've heard in a while. LoL!

Instead they gave it to Factcheck to photograph, and on the photos the seal is there for all to see.

Yeah, almost 2 months later. See post 454 for the answer.

But of course, predictably, the birthers then go on to say that the Factcheck document isn't the same as the scanned document.

Because it's not. And it's still a forgery.

[MHGinTN]

Notice how the obots never explain why the scanned images and the photographs at Factcheck are not exhibits of the same document? LOL ... liars and democrats are so transparent in their kneepad service to the Obammy.