Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 09/25/2009 6:54:28 AM PDT by maquiladora
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-36 next last
To: maquiladora

Vlad becomes Obie’s next speed bump.


2 posted on 09/25/2009 6:56:48 AM PDT by gov_bean_ counter (Is it too soon for real conservatives to launch a "We Tried to Warn You Tour"?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: maquiladora

WTF does this mean?


3 posted on 09/25/2009 6:56:53 AM PDT by ichabod1 ( I am rolling over in my grave and I am not even dead yet.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: maquiladora

Huh? I think I need an aspirin.


4 posted on 09/25/2009 6:57:11 AM PDT by RexBeach
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: maquiladora

So they took down the missile defenses and replaced them with offensive capability? Doesn’t that just guarantee more death if an attack was to take place?


5 posted on 09/25/2009 6:57:16 AM PDT by Personal Responsibility (In a time of universal deceit, telling the truth is a revolutionary act)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: maquiladora

With Obama, that might be so the Russkies can turn them around on Western Europe when we cede Poland to them. Only half kidding with this Quisling in office.


6 posted on 09/25/2009 6:59:08 AM PDT by Dr. Sivana (There is no salvation in politics.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: lizol

Heard anything about this?


7 posted on 09/25/2009 6:59:43 AM PDT by Army Air Corps (Four fried chickens and a coke)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: maquiladora
Time to get some popcorn.

Make sure to salt it with iodine.

9 posted on 09/25/2009 7:00:46 AM PDT by AU72
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: maquiladora
Gazeta Wyborcza said Washington aimed to set up a permanent short- and medium-range missile base as well as deploy mobile missile batteries.

This is pretty damned vague. What KIND of short and medium range missiles?
10 posted on 09/25/2009 7:01:39 AM PDT by Army Air Corps (Four fried chickens and a coke)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: maquiladora

we need some adults in charge


11 posted on 09/25/2009 7:01:55 AM PDT by dalebert
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: maquiladora

We need to come home... from everywhere.


13 posted on 09/25/2009 7:02:21 AM PDT by DecoyJames
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: maquiladora
Barry is smoking something, and it is not tobacco.
14 posted on 09/25/2009 7:02:51 AM PDT by TigerLikesRooster (LUV DIC -- L,U,V-shaped recession, Depression, Inflation, Collapse)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: maquiladora
So, are we deploying the missles we're not deploying or not deploying the missles we're deploying?

The fact that it's a Polish source speaking through a French news service may account for the WTF, but seriously...WTF?

19 posted on 09/25/2009 7:08:05 AM PDT by AngryJawa (Obama's Success is America's Failure)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: maquiladora

Not that i *EVER* want to be seen defending something Zero has done, I do recall that when the original “no missiles for Poland” articles came out, they made reference to not fielding the originally planned systems, but rather replacing them with Raytheon’s SM-3 (Standard Missile Block 3) land-based system currently under development for the US (and Israel). This actually makes sense. The SM-3 is currently deployed on certain US Naval fleet and theatre defense ships, and IS A PROVEN ballistic missile interceptor.

take a look at the following article I found on google —

http://www.aviationweek.com/aw/generic/story_channel.jsp?channel=defense&id=news/SM3082409.xml


21 posted on 09/25/2009 7:09:07 AM PDT by Blueflag (Res ipsa loquitur)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: maquiladora

Whiskey Tango Foxtrot?

Colonel, USAFR


24 posted on 09/25/2009 7:12:48 AM PDT by jagusafr (Kill the red lizard, Lord! - nod to C.S. Lewis)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: maquiladora

If you don’t feel like clicking on the article, here’s the relevant war-porn text. (note it is referred to as the Block 1A and 1B, not the Block 3 as I wrote):

“Raytheon’s ship-based SM-3 Block IA has been universally hailed by Pentagon officials as a success because of recent test-intercepts and the impromptu use of the three-stage missile to destroy a wayward intelligence satellite in February 2008. The MDA is planning to open a program office to manage the development of a land-based version here, where many of the agency’s program offices are located. The Army will likely operate it. SM-3 has a shorter range than the GBI, though program officials are working to increase the velocity at burnout to provide more engagement flexibility.

Using the 14.5-in.-dia. SM-3 Block IB, which is in development, six or seven batteries would be required to provide coverage to Europe. The IB will include a new divert-and-attitude-control system as well as a new two-color seeker. Michael Booen, a vice president at Raytheon, says the system could achieve initial operational capability in 2013 (far sooner than the fixed GBI site in Poland); the MDA requested $50 million to start work in Fiscal 2010. The IB is designed to counter short- and medium-range ballistic missiles and will likely provide some capability against intermediate-range threats, says Dean Gehr, Raytheon’s SM-3 program lead. It is not seen as intimidating to Russia’s long-range missiles, and thus could be more politically palatable.”


25 posted on 09/25/2009 7:13:35 AM PDT by Blueflag (Res ipsa loquitur)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: maquiladora

wonder if this isn’t a way for us to lean on Russia in order to get them behind a sanctions regime for Iran - lot of stuff happening


28 posted on 09/25/2009 7:16:17 AM PDT by jhpigott
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: maquiladora

You mean bo is now using our troops as the shield ???
Shaking my head.


31 posted on 09/25/2009 7:23:00 AM PDT by jackv (The darkness hates the light!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: maquiladora
As I see it, this is just another Obama attempt to create confusion. That's all he does.

The more confused we are, the more mixed his messages, the more he says one thing one day and another thing the next, the more potential chaos he creates, and the more power he believes he can accrue.

I think this is nothing more than a game to him. The whole thing is a Marxist game.

36 posted on 09/25/2009 7:35:36 AM PDT by ohioWfan (Proud Mom of a Bronze Star recipient!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: maquiladora

Yeah. The US is ALSO planning a BORDER FENCE between Texas and Mexico. Odds are, the same guy will be working on BOTH...for another decade or so.


37 posted on 09/25/2009 7:36:18 AM PDT by Oldpuppymax (AGENDA OF THE LEFT EXPOSED)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: maquiladora
Hey, when Reagan announced he was going to deploy missiles in Europe, there was an enormous uproar - financed in part by the Soviet Union. All the talk was of nuclear Armageddon. I can't wait to hear the American Left and their cohorts in the media howl about this action by Obama.
38 posted on 09/25/2009 7:39:02 AM PDT by popdonnelly (Yes, we disagree - no, we won't shut up - no, we won't quit.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-36 next last

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson