Skip to comments.
Photog Says She Purposely Made Glenn Beck Look Bad On Time Cover
Mediaite ^
| September 18, 2009
| Steve Krakauer
Posted on 09/18/2009 12:03:58 PM PDT by rightwingintelligentsia
As we noted yesterday when news broke about Time Magazines cover story on Glenn Beck, the image used is from a photo shoot last year by Jill Greenberg.
Its an interesting choice. Greenberg is known for her liberal views and shes being very upfront about her use of this opportunity to take revenge on those who attacked her.
Greenberg brought up the cover on Twitter (she goes by the ironic handle @JillManipulator). Heres her comment:
exactly a year after my right wing attack, i am retouching one of my attackers for a magazine cover. leaving blemishes of course.
Time may not have known Greenbergs intent here, but this is a very blatant admittance on her part that shes purposely making Beck look bad. And although Time may not have known that, they had to have known her background.
Shes the same photographer who took purposely awful pictures of Sen. John McCain during the campaign, and then photoshopped them on her own site to make him look even worse. The Atlantic said they wouldnt pay her for her work because she went beyond the parameters of her contract.
(Excerpt) Read more at mediaite.com ...
TOPICS: News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: glennbeck; jillgreenberg; liberalmedia; time; timemag
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 61-80, 81-100, 101-120 ... 141-148 next last
To: rightwingintelligentsia
What a twit. She thinks that by trying to make Glen look bad on a cover of a magazine, will some how diminish him.
Hey Jill it's the cover of Time, I guessing not too many Glen Beck listeners read this rag. And the ones that do won't stop listening because of some picture; they're not superficial libtards like you. But I'm guessing you feeeel good about yourself for this; must help you cope with knowing your a Liberal loser.
81
posted on
09/18/2009 12:58:33 PM PDT
by
skully
(Truth and reality will never stop a libtard from trying to poop a rainbow.)
To: rightwingintelligentsia
82
posted on
09/18/2009 12:58:58 PM PDT
by
The Wizard
(Democrat Party: a criminal enterprise)
To: rightwingintelligentsia
All things considered, it could have been worse.
Time could have posted this picture on its cover:
83
posted on
09/18/2009 12:59:18 PM PDT
by
chs68
To: COUNTrecount
Jill Greenberg - before August...
Jill Greenberg - after August...
To: Pharmboy
Wait till they see his own photo he chose to use on his new book just released in the last few days.
85
posted on
09/18/2009 1:02:01 PM PDT
by
KC Burke
(...but He has made the trains run on time.)
To: DesertConservative
I agree, that’s what I was trying to say but you said it so much better...
86
posted on
09/18/2009 1:04:17 PM PDT
by
blueyon
(It is worth taking a stand even if you are standing alone!)
To: rightwingintelligentsia
This is the same photographer who “made McCain look bad” on a magazine cover last year, remember?
87
posted on
09/18/2009 1:06:28 PM PDT
by
arasina
(So there.)
To: rightwingintelligentsia
Hey TIME! Back atcha. We don't needya.
88
posted on
09/18/2009 1:07:02 PM PDT
by
paulycy
(Screw the RACErs.)
To: rightwingintelligentsia
Maybe we can reach a point where people in general understand leftists are unprofessional and vicious.
89
posted on
09/18/2009 1:07:40 PM PDT
by
Williams
(It's The Policies, Stupid.)
To: arasina
90
posted on
09/18/2009 1:10:07 PM PDT
by
arasina
(So there.)
To: Williams
Does anyone read Time anymore?
91
posted on
09/18/2009 1:10:14 PM PDT
by
Cloverfarm
(Where are we going, and why are we in a hand-basket?)
To: rightwingintelligentsia
Why do any conservatives even cooperate with these hacks? All they do is help sell their liberal rags.
92
posted on
09/18/2009 1:10:27 PM PDT
by
silverleaf
(If we are astroturf, why are the democrats trying to mow us?)
To: Jewbacca
There ya go! Looks like a great cover for TIME...
sw
93
posted on
09/18/2009 1:12:09 PM PDT
by
spectre
(Spectre's wife (WE THE PEOPLE RULE)
To: demsux
Yeah, I canceled my subscription of 20 years to Time when the Luce family sold it to Warner.
94
posted on
09/18/2009 1:14:12 PM PDT
by
stubernx98
(cranky, but reasonable)
To: Hacklehead
Really? He looks like a mental patient.
Mind if I ask you how Obama's pics look to you?
95
posted on
09/18/2009 1:15:22 PM PDT
by
alecqss
To: rightwingintelligentsia
I think he looks handsome and funny with the tongue out.
He’s doing exactly what I would like to do if I had the cover of Time.
96
posted on
09/18/2009 1:15:50 PM PDT
by
autumnraine
(You can't fix stupid, but you can vote it out!)
To: delphirogatio
Egad. She looks like she comes with a set of whips and a chain saw.
97
posted on
09/18/2009 1:19:10 PM PDT
by
La Lydia
To: rightwingintelligentsia
98
posted on
09/18/2009 1:20:22 PM PDT
by
edge10
(Obama lied, babies died!)
To: TigersEye
I’m not sure what it is, but I was going to go with....
MOONBAT
No wonder she has so many pictures of crybabies, it’s like looking in the mirror for her.
99
posted on
09/18/2009 1:22:16 PM PDT
by
delphirogatio
(Many are the woes of the wicked, but the LORD's unfailing love surrounds the man who trusts in him.)
To: blueyon
Yeah, I think it’s a cool pic. It reminds me of the one Newsweek used not long ago of Rush Limbaugh, where he looks just incredibly sinister. Apparently Rush loved it!
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 61-80, 81-100, 101-120 ... 141-148 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson