Posted on 09/17/2009 11:52:15 AM PDT by Drew68
COLUMBUS, GA (WTVM) - Attorney Orly Taitz filed a brief Thursday morning in Columbus' US District Court requesting for a stay of deployment pending her client's motion for a rehearing.
This comes just one day after Judge Clay Land denied Captain Connie Rhodes' temporary restraining order, dismissed the entire case and ordered Rhodes to pay the defendant's court costs.
Rhodes, a military doctor, is challenging deployment orders to Iraq based on allegations that the Commander in Chief is ineligible to hold the office of president. Rhodes maintains that President Barack Obama was born in Kenya and not Hawaii.
"This is outrageous and a mischaracter of justice. I think that Judge Land should be sanctioned for judicial misconduct. He has violated my client's civil rights by denying her a trial by jury and not giving us 20 days to respond before making a decision, " says Taitz.
Judge Land also stated in his ruling that he would sanction Taitz if she filed any future actions in his court that were similarly "frivolous".
Judge Land was not available for comment.
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
I don’t see anyone manning up to do this tough job.
First year law student? FDLMAO...Puhleeeze
A Temporary Restraining Order becomes effective only once it has been served on the restrained person (so s/he has notice and can seek an opportunity to be heard). In addition to the Temporary Restraining Order, an “Order to Show Cause” hearing is scheduled so that both parties will have the opportunity to explain to the court the reasons why a more “permanent” restraining order should or should not be issued.
Temporary Restraining Orders usually can be issued the same day they are requested and remain in effect until the scheduled hearing on the Order to Show Cause. The Order to Show Cause hearing is typically scheduled to occur within 15 or 20 days.
First year law student? FDLMAO...Puhleeeze
A Temporary Restraining Order becomes effective only once it has been served on the restrained person (so s/he has notice and can seek an opportunity to be heard). In addition to the Temporary Restraining Order, an “Order to Show Cause” hearing is scheduled so that both parties will have the opportunity to explain to the court the reasons why a more “permanent” restraining order should or should not be issued.
Temporary Restraining Orders usually can be issued the same day they are requested and remain in effect until the scheduled hearing on the Order to Show Cause. The Order to Show Cause hearing is typically scheduled to occur within 15 or 20 days.
Some months ago Orly supposedly had the attention of Chief Justice Roberts about the b/c matter. Anyone know what became of that??
and since the Constitution mandates that the President be “natural born” no acts, or laws passed by Congress can counter this, because The Constitution is the supreme law of the land.
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Exactly! Being natural born is an intrinsic quality of a person in the same way that race or eye color is intrinsic.
Congress can vote a thousand times over that a person has blue eyes but if the eyes are brown, they will continue to be brown.
In the same way, Congress can approve a person a MILLION times over, but if he is not natural born he can NOT be president. If a non-natural born person occupies the position of president, at best he can merely be a criminal fraud and a traitor to his country.
Some months ago Orly supposedly had the attention of Chief Justice Roberts about the b/c matter. Anyone know what became of that??
If you remember some of the first words out of her mouth were telling the Cheif Justice that there were criminal activities going on in the SCOTUS or words to that effect. IMO, you don’t tell the Chief Justice that the court he oversees allows criminal activities to go on within it’s rooms. She give him a box of material to read there was nothing else just the reading material. Not sure what she expected the Chief Justice to do.
It went something like this:
Justice Roberts seemed to be impressed by that and I continued. "Are you aware that there is criminal activity going on in the Supreme Court of the United States?" "My name is Orly Taitz, I am an attorney from Southern California. I left home at three o'clock in the morning and flew and drove thousands of miles to talk to you and to ask you a question."
Yep. Orly publically accused the Chief Justice of the United States Supreme Court, to his face, of being party to in criminal activity in his courtroom.
No CREDIBLE evidence?
Are you saying the stuff Orly is providing is credible? If so then she should have some backup material to prove it wouldn’t you think?
Some months ago Orly supposedly had the attention of Chief Justice Roberts about the b/c matter. Anyone know what became of that??
Sorry for dup. post.....interrupted by phone.
What are you talking about? The motion was heard, with Orly and her client both present, on the day it was scheduled for. Orly claims that her client had a right to trial by jury, but there are no juries in injunction cases.
In violation of the states rules.
State rules don't apply in federal court. The procedure applied here was in conformity with the federal rules.
For a law student, you seem to forget those facts.
I haven't been a law student for a long time. I have been a practicing lawyer for more than 30 years.
eh...would you like fries with that mistake?
What mistake is that?
When allegtations are made that the constitution has been violated, the suspected fraud should produce the records he is avoiding showing. Then the judge will determine if there is a case. To do so beforehand is to allow the suspect to get away without reviewing the “best evidence;” something a judge may eventually stand up for or perhaps history, or the court of public opinion, or an insider tiring of covering up the fraud. There are many ways the truth may be revealed.
Totally agree.
There are a lot of experts on this blog who think they know better how to do what Orly is attempting, but there is only one nutjob who has gone this far and been this successful. Hooray! For this nutjob.
Orly rocks and needs to be encouraged all the way to success!
Look, Drew, I lived through the Clarence Thomas hearings, the trial of the Weathermen in Chicago, the Iran-Contra hearings, the OJ Simpson trial — no way her brief comes even close to the insanity produced by “mainstream” public judges, lawyers and legislators in those procedures.
You, are the crazy one, amigo. Crazy to not want a full hearing for the facts.
She still hasn't managed to get the pistol out of her holster and she is down to about three toes. The left is thoroughly enjoying this, and it suggests Coulter had good cause to recommend the birther issue just be dropped.
It doesn't seem to matter which party is in the Oval Office you get these type actions from one side or the other. Clinton had his Fort Marcy Park thing, Mena drugs, etc. Maybe the Mena thing include the Bushes also. GWB had his nemesis with the nut that wrote a book or two about his military service and drugs, etc. The nut later committed suicide or died up in OK I believe.
You don’t get to make up your own rules. Just because you think a court should do the investigating, doesn’t create the obligation, or the rational expectation, that one will.
You have to present a case to the court. You don’t go to court and tell the judge you think there’s a problem, but you don’t have any evidence unless the court investigates.
You call this success??
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.