Those images were produced from a single reel of microfilm. Not from the original newspapers, and not from a microfilm obtained from the newspapers either. From a library, where they had been checked out not long before they were "discovered". Strangely no one has been able to find the newspaper announcement of the Nordyke twins birth, the day after Obama's is said to have been. But images of certified copies of their original long form are to be found, originally published by the Honolulu Advertiser, but now the story with them is no longer accessible, at least not at the original URL. Interestingly the younger of two has a file sequence number 3 lower than that shown on the FactCheck version of the Obama COLB, despite the fact that they were born 19 hours *after* he was, and according to their long form, and his COLB, his certificate was filed 3 days before theirs. Just another anomaly, in a sea of others surrounding BHO Jr.
One of the newspapers now says on their "vital records" page that the date indicated is not the birth or marriage license date, but rather the date the document was filed. If that was true in '61, then there's another little problem for the newspaper announcements visa vi the online COLB.
So? I've never hear of any library or news organization keeping newspapers lying around for 40 years! Have you?
and not from a microfilm obtained from the newspapers either. From a library,
I see, so libraries can't be trusted in your paranoid mind. They're in on the conspiracy!
where they had been checked out not long before they were "discovered".
Right. That's very suspicious, because we know no one ever checks out microfilms of old newspapers. Ever. Libraries just keep them so that they can gather dust.
Strangely no one has been able to find the newspaper announcement of the Nordyke twins birth, the day after Obama's is said to have been.
And who exactly looked? You? Some anonymous guy reporting to WorldNutDaily?
Interestingly the younger of two has a file sequence number 3 lower than that shown on the FactCheck version of the Obama COLB, despite the fact that they were born 19 hours *after* he was, and according to their long form, and his COLB, his certificate was filed 3 days before theirs.
I see. That would only be a problem if you assume the number were based on time of birth. You know this how?
his certificate was filed 3 days before theirs.
Again you are making assumptions about how the certificate numbers were generated. What evidence do you have that they are generated in the order you think they should have been generated?
Just another anomaly, in a sea of others surrounding BHO Jr.
Yup, clear sign of the paranoid mind: to see "anomalies" behind every corner.