So? I've never hear of any library or news organization keeping newspapers lying around for 40 years! Have you?
and not from a microfilm obtained from the newspapers either. From a library,
I see, so libraries can't be trusted in your paranoid mind. They're in on the conspiracy!
where they had been checked out not long before they were "discovered".
Right. That's very suspicious, because we know no one ever checks out microfilms of old newspapers. Ever. Libraries just keep them so that they can gather dust.
Strangely no one has been able to find the newspaper announcement of the Nordyke twins birth, the day after Obama's is said to have been.
And who exactly looked? You? Some anonymous guy reporting to WorldNutDaily?
Interestingly the younger of two has a file sequence number 3 lower than that shown on the FactCheck version of the Obama COLB, despite the fact that they were born 19 hours *after* he was, and according to their long form, and his COLB, his certificate was filed 3 days before theirs.
I see. That would only be a problem if you assume the number were based on time of birth. You know this how?
his certificate was filed 3 days before theirs.
Again you are making assumptions about how the certificate numbers were generated. What evidence do you have that they are generated in the order you think they should have been generated?
Just another anomaly, in a sea of others surrounding BHO Jr.
Yup, clear sign of the paranoid mind: to see "anomalies" behind every corner.
Putting words in my mouth again I see.
Libraries do not in general keep very tight control over their stuff, except to ensure that it doesn't walk out the door. Patrons are left alone with the material, sometimes in "screened" environments, such as cubbyhole.
It turns out, I mispoke. They came from two rolls of microfilm, which, AFAIK, no one has gone back to even look at again. But even if they have, splicing in a single frame in the semi-privacy of a library cubbyhole would not be all that hard.
And who exactly looked? You? Some anonymous guy reporting to WorldNutDaily? Some anonymous poster at Texas Darling. They are also the one who reported that someone else had accessed the microfilm so recently that they had not been re-shelved.
I see. That would only be a problem if you assume the number were based on time of birth. You know this how? So how do you think it's done? And why would you think it's done that way? Pretty much every system that logs things does so in sequence of arrival. Remember this was a paper system, filing paper documents.
What evidence do you have that they are generated in the order you think they should have been generated? The Nordyke twins, born minutes apart, have sequential file numbers. So they don't draw the numbers out of a hat.
Why don't you just change your name to "Defender of The Faith?", since you certainly don't seem to have much curiosity.