Posted on 09/10/2009 9:42:35 PM PDT by moonpie57
If you spend some time checking out all links at post 145, that will get your hair to raise like a hair brush!!!
The truth is certainly better than blindly insisting that nationality equals race.
How old are you? Young I'll bet.
The statement of a corporate secretary for a major news network confirming the existence of a one-page inter-office memo, bearing the markings “confidential” and “not for dissemination,” addressed and distributed to news anchors and on-air talent” that specifically instructed the recipients to avoid any discussion pertaining to the Obama birth certificate controversy. The memo was written and distributed in October 2008, and specifically instructed on-air talent to “advise guests, as necessary, to refrain from citing any news story, legal proceedings, Internet ‘blogs’ or other sources that pertain to the ongoing eligibility controversy of future President Barack Obama.”
As outlined above, our Investigation has uncovered both direct and indirect evidence of threats being made against some of the nation’s top radio and television personalities, which would explain some giving this topic mere lip service.
As one source interviewed during the course of this investigation stated, “I’ve got a career and family to think about.”
Although no one should be surprised over the manipulation of the news, the nature of this manipulation, and the extent of the threats against journalists, should shock even the most well grounded.
Any reasonable person must question the motivation of the media moguls. The individuals who have - and continue to threaten talk show hosts, news anchors, and others are the top people. We are not talking about mid or upper level management - this is from the very top in all cases. If there is nothing here, why the secrecy?
The first one where it was known at the time he usurped the office. Vice President Chester Arthur's father was not a citizen at the time of his birth, although Chester was born in the US, and his father did eventually become naturalized when Chester was about 14. Arthur became President upon the assassination of President Garfield in 1881.
But in this case we do know.
You are being abysmally stupid when the proof is that your claim of ‘african’ being a choice on the Hawaii BC is false and yet keep on merrily plugging away.
Stupidity: doing the same thing repeatedly and yet expecting a different result.
Ever hear of the United Negro College Fund?
Plus 944!!!
Is he a NBC???
I fail to see how anyone can address this matter intelligently if they have no background in understanding how the Judicial Branch of the Federal Government operates and why. If somebody does not want to read a particular book because the author is a commie professor, find one that is written by a conservative.
A theory has developed that there must be a “citizen recall process” for the Presidency, and the Federal Courts are obligated to participate in it.
Further issues to study to get a better grasp of the situation:
-The Watergate hearings (notice that they were not held in a federal court room.)
-Tilden vs. Hayes 1876. This is not a real case because Tilden never filed suit in federal court. That is why people say that these are “political matters”.
What most of the posters on here really want is a “hearing”. They hold public hearings all the time at the state House. A federal courtroom is not a great place to hold a public hearing ... hard to think of a worse place.
“Our investigation?”
Is Rockford now working for Orly?
I never claimed it was a "choice". No one has even shown that there was a defined set of choices on 1961 Hawaiian long-from BC's. I only claim that it is plausible that in at least one instance, someone was allowed to write "African" in this blank.
Thanks and a BTTT for your excerpt. (Especially for people in and out as I am today.)
Why should they???
You’ve been steering a lot of people to Hypo’s post in #145.
Are you familiar with the Northeast Intelligence Network(NIN)? After reading that site today it appears to be somewhat conspiratorial. For FReepers to jump on that theory my fear is it pushes them from a birther position toward the truther type of theory.
If they know details about a cover up why aren’t they letting the information out? The reasons they give are hard to swallow.
He could give a s***. 0bama could be a street thug bisexual crack head illegal alien for all he cares.
Wait...
If you read the reports of what Orly is doing, she is really attempting to have a congressional hearing each time she enters the courtroom. She’s making political statements. She calling random witnesses. She’s asking for audience participation.
I call myself a right-winger all the time.
In New Hampshire, I called some old guy a conservative and he said, “Conservative? Up here we call ourselves reactionaries!”
No, I just meant “big” as in the kind of slimeball bully who picks on the small.
Because Federalist Society attorneys are good at the law and stuff.
And Orly can get you a two bedroom for $450,000.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.