You are being abysmally stupid when the proof is that your claim of ‘african’ being a choice on the Hawaii BC is false and yet keep on merrily plugging away.
Stupidity: doing the same thing repeatedly and yet expecting a different result.
I never claimed it was a "choice". No one has even shown that there was a defined set of choices on 1961 Hawaiian long-from BC's. I only claim that it is plausible that in at least one instance, someone was allowed to write "African" in this blank.