Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Schwarzenegger accepts veto dare
Sacramento Bee ^ | 9/9/9 | Kevin Yamamura

Posted on 09/09/2009 10:40:00 AM PDT by SmithL

In the latest round of Capitol brinksmanship, Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger vetoed a bill honoring Vietnam veterans and threatened to kill 72 other proposals on his desk because he said lawmakers have ignored his priority issues.

The Senate withdrew all of its 43 bills from the Republican governor's desk for temporary safekeeping. But in an act of defiance, the Assembly left on his desk a bill that would designate March 30 as "Welcome Home Vietnam Veterans Day."

"I dare the governor to veto this bill," said Assembly Majority Leader Alberto Torrico, D-Newark, before the close of Tuesday's session.

Shortly afterward, Schwarzenegger accepted the dare and vetoed Assembly Bill 264.

"Our state is facing significant challenges, including the need for comprehensive changes in our policies on water, energy, and corrections and the need to take meaningful steps to stimulate the economy and rein in the rising levels of unemployment," Schwarzenegger wrote in his veto message. "This bill does nothing to address any of these issues. I look forward to considering this measure when these other major issues are addressed."

Assemblyman Paul Cook, R-Yucca Valley, a Vietnam veteran who co-authored AB 264 and wears a Marine Corps pin on his lapel, said he was "dismayed and angry."

"This is something that is long overdue and it's something I feel very, very strongly about," Cook said. "And (a veto) just shows no respect for all those veterans."

Schwarzenegger issued his threat earlier Tuesday against 43 bills in the Senate and 30 in the Assembly to gain leverage while his biggest priorities hang in the balance.

(Excerpt) Read more at sacbee.com ...


TOPICS: Editorial; Government; Politics/Elections; US: California
KEYWORDS: goldenstate; schwarzenegger; veto; yourtaxdollarsatwork
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-22 next last
Like there aren't plenty of bills that actually desrve a veto.
1 posted on 09/09/2009 10:40:01 AM PDT by SmithL
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: SmithL
And (a veto) just shows no respect for all those veterans.

No, a veto shows no respect for the Cali legislature, tho' maybe too late to matter.

2 posted on 09/09/2009 10:45:31 AM PDT by green iguana
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SmithL
Sounds like he is standing on principle and for that he should be commended. Obviously he's sending a message to the legislature and will pass the bill at a later time. I for one like seeing a politician with a spine.
3 posted on 09/09/2009 10:47:42 AM PDT by RockyMtnMan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: green iguana

Wow, Schwarzenegger will actually veto a bill? What a profile in courage Schwarzenegger is!


4 posted on 09/09/2009 10:55:07 AM PDT by steven33442
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: SmithL

Ummmm... I came home from Nam on July 27, 1969. I got a welcome..... 40 years of being depicted as a potential psychopath by liberals. Kalif legislators can keep their f&&&ing welcome. Then they can go suck cyanide for all I care. I left that pesthole of a State for the free air of Utah 27 years ago. Kalif can KMA and fall in the ocean.


5 posted on 09/09/2009 10:56:13 AM PDT by Seruzawa (Obamalama lied, the republic died.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SmithL

Is Ahhnold actually growing some?


6 posted on 09/09/2009 10:56:17 AM PDT by FourPeas (Why does Professor Presbury's wolfhound, Roy, endeavour to bite him?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SmithL

March 30 as “Welcome Home Vietnam Veterans Day.” “I dare the governor to veto this bill,”

Vietnam was 30 years ago, as a vet I see no reason to continue to live in the past.

Clearly the CA leadership is in no condition to manage current affairs or work on our future.


7 posted on 09/09/2009 11:02:06 AM PDT by edcoil (If I had 1 cent for every dollar the government saved, Bill Gates and I would be friends.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: steven33442
Wow, Schwarzenegger will actually veto a bill? What a profile in courage Schwarzenegger is!

Schwartzenegger is no conservative, but he's vetoed plenty of bills, including one that would include teaching "homosexuals of note" in schools, and I think thee was one which tried to legislate homosexual marriage, and tax increase attempts. If he says he'll veto a bill, he will and I applaud him for that.

8 posted on 09/09/2009 11:06:16 AM PDT by hsalaw
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Seruzawa

Come on. Tell us how you really feel about California. LOL! I live in California, and am now looking for a place to retire - somewhere with some actual conservative leadership. I don’t think I could survive Alaska; maybe Texas or Utah.


9 posted on 09/09/2009 11:08:38 AM PDT by hsalaw
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: edcoil

I bet he vetoes the “Baby Milk factory” bill as well


10 posted on 09/09/2009 11:11:06 AM PDT by AppyPappy (If you aren't part of the solution, there is good money to be made prolonging the problem.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: FourPeas
Is Ahhnold actually growing some?

No, there must be an election coming up. Fake right then move left.

11 posted on 09/09/2009 11:12:27 AM PDT by BubbaBasher ("Liberty will not long survive the total extinction of morals" - Sam Adams)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: hsalaw

I don’t really know what Schwarzenegger is, nor at this point do I particularly care.


12 posted on 09/09/2009 11:15:19 AM PDT by steven33442
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: SmithL

Assembly comes up with 43 Bills, and none address the problems in CA, means that they have too much time on their hands, and the CA Legislature should go back to a “Part Time Legislature”, then they wouldn’t have the time to come up with License’s for illegals, or other nonsense.


13 posted on 09/09/2009 11:39:34 AM PDT by Prowler Fowler (One loves to possess arms, though they hope never to have occasion for them.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RockyMtnMan
Sounds like he is standing on principle and for that he should be commended. Obviously he's sending a message to the legislature and will pass the bill at a later time. I for one like seeing a politician with a spine.

It's a shame he didn't undergo that spine transplant when it really would have mattered. Schwarzenegger is threatening to do what some people thought was impossible, once upon a time: he's threatening to make Gray Davis into an object of nostalgia.

But I seem to remember several boatloads of people around here (not including yourself) yapping that Schwarzenegger was the. best. and. most. electable. shot. we'd. get. at. Beige. Davis., never mind that the signs were well enough in evidence that he just might go precisely the way he has when all was done and too much said, and the very viable Tom McClintock was there for the running against an incumbent who wouldn't have survived if he'd been challenged by a baby in a carriage, such had been the state into which Davis had driven himself and California.

So California got Mr. "Electable" . . . and the evidence is there for one and all to see. How's that one working out, gang?

14 posted on 09/09/2009 11:41:24 AM PDT by BluesDuke (The waste is a terrible thing to mind . . .)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: BluesDuke
"How's that one working out, gang?"

Actually it worked out much better than having Gov. Bustamante. For example, Arnold reversed the car tax, then un-reversed it but we had a few years without it and I will accept the extra bucks in my pocket.

"the very viable Tom McClintock"

You mean the same McClintock that has lost three times when running for statewide office? I am a big McClintock fan and have donated to his campaigns but no matter how much wishful thinking you have he is not electable to statewide office in CA.
15 posted on 09/09/2009 11:59:59 AM PDT by fifedom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: SmithL

Using veterans as political pawns is the outrageous. Shame on the Governor and Torrico. He should have made a statement condeming the dare and then signed the bill. Torrico needs to be removed for making the challenge. Remember him when his time is up. Let ‘em both know that they were wrong!

Torrico Tel: (916) 319-2020
Governor’s Phone: 916-445-2841


16 posted on 09/09/2009 1:57:21 PM PDT by oneamericanvoice (Support freedom! Support the troops! Surrender is not an option!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RockyMtnMan

I fully understand what he was doing, but in so doing he used the vets as pawns. Shame on both the Governor and Torrico.

Torrico Tel: (916) 319-2020
Governor’s Phone: 916-445-2841


17 posted on 09/09/2009 1:58:46 PM PDT by oneamericanvoice (Support freedom! Support the troops! Surrender is not an option!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: edcoil

I’m a vet too, but this wasn’t so much about vets as Democrats using vets as pawns. They were betting that he wouldn’t veto it because it was the vets. Shame on both for using vets.


18 posted on 09/09/2009 2:00:43 PM PDT by oneamericanvoice (Support freedom! Support the troops! Surrender is not an option!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: steven33442
Wow, Schwarzenegger will actually veto a bill? What a profile in courage Schwarzenegger is!

How many threads are you going to troll?

19 posted on 09/09/2009 2:39:10 PM PDT by ScreamingFist
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Seruzawa

Thank you for your service to our country, sir.


20 posted on 09/09/2009 5:32:02 PM PDT by fieldmarshaldj (~"This is what happens when you find a stranger in the Alps !"~~)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-22 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson