Posted on 09/04/2009 8:19:02 AM PDT by Laissez-faire capitalist
While an administration official told ABC News that controversial White House official Van Jones signature on a 2004 petition suggesting that the Bush administration let 9/11 happen in order to justify war was because he did not carefully review the language in the petition, another link between Jones and the Truther Movement has emerged...
... in March 2002, a march in San Francisco was called to demand a congressional inquiry into 9/11. Jones was on the "organizing committee."
...
(Excerpt) Read more at blogs.abcnews.com ...
Uh huh. Van Jones' name is so high on the petition list that he practically ran over the back of Ed Asner to scribble his name on it first.
President Obama, you certainly seem to have nothing but a bunch of degenerate bomb-throwing Communist assholes for friends.
He will become another worthless lump/bump under 0b0z0’s bus.
do you prefer Firestone or Michelin bus tires, Mr. Jones?
I hope so...that will teach them to mess with Glenn Beck!
Bob Beckel said “he’ll (Van Jones) be filing for unemployment on Tuesday”, on Fox News this morn.
9/11 Truthers?
I know Ron Paul must fit in this somewhere.
Man did Glenn have this guy pegged.
It goes very well with the warnings several of us were posting last year before the election:
Six months into the Obama administration, it should now be clear to all Americans: Hope and Change came to the White House wrapped in brass knuckles.*
*Michelle Malkin: Bully Boys: A Brief History of White House Thuggery townhall.com ^ | July 29, 2009 | Michelle Malkin
Well he didn’t know what the group he was organizing was doing.
Bob Beckel spent a lot of time on fox this morning insisting that the SECRET SERVICE is to blame for not vetting the guy.
He kept saying stupidly that the SS wouldn’t have let a known communist into the White House.
Of course, the SS only checks for known terrorists, and while they certainly would have provided a full accounting of Jones to the White House, the SS does not exist to stop the President from appointing whoever he wants.
If Obama wanted to give Hugo Chavez a job in the White House, the SS would not be able to stop him.
But at least Bob B. said Jones had to go — although he defended Jones for calling Republicans A-holes.
They showed two different tapes of Valerie Jarrett praising Van Jones to the high heavens (on Glenn Beck last night) as she introducted him as the new greencommie cazr. She talked about how “we’ve all been watching his career since.... (can’t remember what year but it was quite a long time ago). Also, some of these wacko statements were just in the last few years. So, how can Obama possibly deny knowing about Van Jones. Obama and Valerie are best pals, she has huge importance in the administration, I don’t think Obama can wriggle out of this one so easily. He’s surrounded himself with treaonous nut cases and word is starting to get out.
The pile just gets deeper and deeper! And mainstream media considers this newsworthy! WOW! The events unfolding are going to be obama’s legacy. Liars, hidden in plain sight.
The important thing is that this is another chink in the Obama armor. The MSM - if not reporting - or certainly watching. I’ll take this war for taking our country back one battle at a time. This is a significant battle won by our side, no matter where VJ goes, does or says in the future. 0 and his administration has the black eye on this one, I think this will really hurt Obama over the next few weeks.
Yup.
ABC is reporing this, has odumbo disguted even his advisors and cheerleaders
Another benefit of all this . . . when the “Green Czar” gets identified as a total nutty, fruitcake as he has the past few days - does it have a negative impact on the whole green jobs economic plan this administration is pushing? In other words, will more people start calling BS on green jobs because they now identify with the fruitcake known as Van Jones?
This won't include personal guests.
So, if Van Jones "resigns", what's to prevent him from micro-managing the Green Jobs cadre behind the scenes? He could come and go every day as a personal guest and continue running the show.
I have often remarked that this country needed a serious wake-up call from its periodic dalliances with leftist “leaders” and suggested that we needed a dedicated Marxist in the White House to rub our noses in the REAL DEAL. We got one with Obama and he may prove to be the best thing that ever happened to the cause of freedom here.
While making that suggestion, my fingers were crossed. On one hand, I feared that the majority of modern-day, government schooled folk and welfare leeches would come to embrace Marxist philosophy and practice and America — the IDEA — would come to an end. On the other hand, I held out hope that my fellow citizens would reject this alien ideology and rebel in a demonstrable way. I thank God that the latter is happening as I write this. The anger and outrage are palpable to even the hard-core leftists now infesting the White House. Barring some catastrophe — which malignant Machiavellians like Rahm “A crisis is too good to waste” Emanuel are fully capable of orchestrating — they will be shown the gate at the next election.
But what has puzzled me most through the run-up to this point (with some notable exceptions of which Georgias Dr. Broun and Dr. Price are but two) is this: WHERE ARE THE PRINCIPLED MEN — REPUBLICANS AND DEMOCRATS ALIKE — WHO SHOULD HAVE BEEN STANDING UP TO THIS GUY?? In order that they might avoid the tough questions inherent in governing this nation, have they shipped so much of THEIR power down Pennsylvania Avenue that they are now AFRAID to reclaim it? Why has it fallen to Michelle Malkin, Rep. Bachman, Glenn Beck, Rush, Boortz and a handful of others to do the job of those we elected to office and swore an oath — to guard the Constitution from “...all enemies foreign and DOMESTIC?” They have largely been MIA!
And, while they have been missing, Obama has appointed more czars than the Russians had through their entire history. I asked Chambliss and Isakson (REPUBLICANS from Georgia) if they were just a tad worried that Obama was forming a politbureau here to replace THEM. Im still waiting for a response that makes sense.
And one final thought as we look forward to replacing the Marxist-n-Thief come 2012: What sort of people have we elected when a small, attractive mother from Alaska named Sarah has BIGGER CAJONES than the alleged MEN now warming seats and wasting expensive space on that hill at the eastern end of Pennsylvania Avenue?
I’m just asking the question we all should be asking.
Have YOU asked the question?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.