Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Jim Bob and Michelle Duggar of '18 Kids and Counting' expecting baby number 19
New York Daily News ^ | September 1st 2009 | Carrie Melago

Posted on 09/02/2009 4:45:54 AM PDT by kingattax

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-24 next last

1 posted on 09/02/2009 4:45:54 AM PDT by kingattax
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: kingattax
Oh what tangled webbs we weave
When we practice to conceive.
2 posted on 09/02/2009 4:48:52 AM PDT by P8riot (I carry a gun because I can't carry a cop.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kingattax

Good for them! Too many Yuppie couples who could easily afford kids don’t have ‘em—or just have one “trophy” child. Someone has to take up the slack.


3 posted on 09/02/2009 4:50:12 AM PDT by rbg81 (DRAIN THE SWAMP!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kingattax

(sigh) I didn’t realize this family had a tv show. Now each child becomes a press conference.


4 posted on 09/02/2009 4:50:26 AM PDT by InvisibleChurch (nothing is normal anymore)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kingattax

I love it. White liberals are turning gay, and having abortions. The Duggars are Christian conservatives. And now their first child has a baby too. Imagine if every one of 19 kids has 10 kids each. Awesome.


5 posted on 09/02/2009 4:53:50 AM PDT by montag813
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kingattax

No sexual disfunction there. You talk about a pair of project managers. I saw a picture of their laundry room. It looked like a laundrymat.


6 posted on 09/02/2009 4:56:19 AM PDT by 70th Division (I love my country but fear my government!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Related.....http://www.freerepublic.com/tag/duggar/index?tab=articles


7 posted on 09/02/2009 4:56:54 AM PDT by ButThreeLeftsDo (Thank You FReepers!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kingattax
God bless them!

Our nation is corporately responsible for the killing of 50 million unborn babies....

These folks are cherishing life.....and have the means to take care of their family.

They are not Jon & Kate!

8 posted on 09/02/2009 4:58:39 AM PDT by Guenevere
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rbg81
Too many Yuppie couples who could easily afford kids don’t have ‘em—or just have one “trophy” child.

Let's be thankful for that.

9 posted on 09/02/2009 5:09:42 AM PDT by Graybeard58 ( Selah.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Graybeard58

I have known lots of people who fall into this sterotype. Most galling was one guy I used to work with (Ted). Ted had been saying for years how he and his wife were saving up a nest egg so they could afford to have a child. Both Ted and his wife worked and had good jobs, so I could never understand “affording a child” was a big issue. I pointed out that I had two kids and my wife didn’t work (and I made about the same as Ted). Then one day, Ted drives into work with a new Audi. After I complemented him on his car, he told me that they’d decided to buy a car instead of have a child. I moved on, but don’t think Ted ever had any kids. Hopeless.


10 posted on 09/02/2009 5:16:34 AM PDT by rbg81 (DRAIN THE SWAMP!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: kingattax

I think the Duggar’s are trying to start their own country.


11 posted on 09/02/2009 5:28:09 AM PDT by scooter2 (IMPEACH OBAMA NOW !)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kingattax

I wonder if Dad has any hobbies....


12 posted on 09/02/2009 5:56:43 AM PDT by Wings-n-Wind (The main things are the plain things!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rbg81

Or, maybe, some people like to show a little restraint in their breeding.

I could make arguments about people who show no restraint or forethought in procreation, and saddle us all with the burden.

If a person doesn’t want kids, or only wants one, what’s it to you?


13 posted on 09/02/2009 5:58:41 AM PDT by SJSAMPLE
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: kingattax
We need more Duggar families! Not only are they producing tomorrow's workers and taxpayers, but they are not just idly downloading kids -- they are raising them right, to be good Christians and model citizens. They have taken their family on mission trips to Central America. They live comfortably but modestly, and the kids all learn at an early age to pitch in and help with meals, shopping, laundry, and housekeeping. They all know how to do things for themselves.

Michelle Duggar has to be the happiest person I have ever seen.

14 posted on 09/02/2009 6:07:28 AM PDT by Dems_R_Losers (U.S. Out of My Doctor's Office!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rbg81

I moved on, but don’t think Ted ever had any kids. Hopeless.

I run into a lot of people who have pets instead of children. They admit it happily. I dont think they realize how pathetic they sound.

I like pets as much as anyone, but they are not to be compared with a child.


15 posted on 09/02/2009 6:13:07 AM PDT by Chickensoup (minestra di pollo)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Wings-n-Wind

I wonder if Dad has any hobbies....

You mean any OTHER hobbies??


16 posted on 09/02/2009 6:13:51 AM PDT by Chickensoup (minestra di pollo)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: kingattax

There was an old lady
Who lived in a shoe
She had so many kids
Her uterus fell out...OH!


17 posted on 09/02/2009 6:14:50 AM PDT by dfwgator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SJSAMPLE

If a person doesn’t want kids, or only wants one, what’s it to you?


The folks in this article seem relatively self sufficient, so it is their burden and no one elses.

My gripe is that I often see the WRONG people having kids—single moms or people who will require public assistance to raise their kids. In the past, the best and the brightest often had the most kids. Now they have the fewest. Sometimes (in the case of Ted) its to chase material stuff. Other times, it’s because they feel the need to minimize their carbon footprint, or some other such nonsense. IMHO, that does not bode well for the future.

But, hey, its a free society, so anyone is certainly entitled to make these decisions.


18 posted on 09/02/2009 6:18:02 AM PDT by rbg81 (DRAIN THE SWAMP!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: rbg81

Exactly.
I’m reminded by the opening scenes of “Idiocracy”, where they examine the procreation habits of two couples.

The first is an intelligent, upwardly mobile, educated and wealthy couple. They’re first say they’re waiting for each of them to complete their Master’s degrees, then they’re waiting for the market to return, etc.

You see them aging, while remaining childless but trying.
Ultimately, the husband dies tring to “extract” sperm for in-vitro. The wife ages and remains childless.

Meanwhile, you see trailer trash copulating with multiple partners, producing offspring that procreate just as wildly. Their offspring outnumbers the intelligent by 16:1.

So much truth in that movie.


19 posted on 09/02/2009 6:41:57 AM PDT by SJSAMPLE
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: rbg81
I moved on, but don’t think Ted ever had any kids. Hopeless.

Probably a good thing!

20 posted on 09/02/2009 7:09:04 AM PDT by ontap
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-24 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson