Posted on 08/11/2009 9:40:20 AM PDT by freedommom
NaturalNews) A Preliminary Injunction to stop mandatory vaccinations has been issued in the United States District Court of New Jersey. This comes after a federal lawsuit opposing forced vaccines was filed in that court by Tim Vawter, pro se attorney, on July 31st with the federal government as defendant. When the judge signs the Preliminary Injunction, it will stop the federal government from forcing anyone in any state to take flu vaccine against their will. It will also prevent a state or local government from forcibly vaccinating anyone, and forbid any person who is not vaccinated from being denied any services or constitutional rights. Vawter's filings included a Complaint, and several pages of evidentiary Exhibits.
Vawter's legal papers have been written not only for filing in federal court, but additionally so they can be looked at by activists around the world for ideas on filing lawsuits in their own countries to help stop forced vaccinations. Vawter believes that as the truth of the dangers of flu vaccines continues to become known, banning the forced use of them will eventually succeed on a worldwide basis. He cautions people to avoid fear and keep themselves focused on the task of blocking forced vaccination.
Preliminary Injunction will immediately halt mandatory vaccinations in the U.S.
The Court, having heard the Motion for Preliminary Injunction and read the papers in its support, states in the Preliminary Injunction that it appears the federal government has engaged in some amount of negligence with regards to failure to properly investigate the safety of the flu vaccines scheduled for use in late 2009-2010, and the evidence submitted does warrant a more thorough investigation into the safety of the flu vaccines.
The Court ordered that the government shall be forbidden from forcing any person to be required to take any influenza vaccination against that person's free will and free choice. The government will not allow any state or local government, or any party, to force any person to be required to take any influenza vaccination against that person's free will and free choice.
It is further ordered that the government shall not deny any constitutional rights to any person who has not received a flu vaccine, nor allow any doctor, company, or other party to deny any of these people services such as medical care, attending school, or similar services or freedoms, nor can the government allow any doctors, companies, or other parties, to deny any of these people their constitutional rights. The only exception to this, where a person who does not get a flu vaccination might be denied certain services, shall be after it is shown in a court of law, with clear and convincing evidence, on an individual case-by-case basis, where due process and a right to a defense is allowed. Only then can a person be denied a particular service because the person did not receive a flu vaccine.
U.S. government sued for gross negligence and violation of the Constitution
In his Cause of Action, Vawter charged that the federal government has engaged in gross negligence by funding and promoting flu vaccines that are proven to be dangerous and manufactured with little oversight. The vaccines scheduled for use in late 2009 and 2010 contain heavy metals including thimerosal mercury, which have been proven to cause autism in children with lowered immune systems, and other dangerous and toxic ingredients. The federal government has stated it will force these flu vaccines onto the American public against their will, under a document signed by Health and Human Services Secretary Kathleen Sebelius.
He further charged that the vaccine makers stand to earn billions of dollars selling vaccines, and are already spending tens of millions advertising a "Phase 6 Pandemic" that the evidence shows does not really exist. The federal government has not required the World Health Organization (WHO) to show evidence of such a pandemic. There has been no collection of facts, sworn testimony, witnesses being questioned, hearings being held, or lie detector tests being given when preposterous statements have been made. The WHO declared a massive "Phase 6 Influenza Pandemic", even though only a few hundred people worldwide had so far died of this swine flu virus, and when far more people die each year of regular flu.
Vawter noted there is a preponderance of evidence to show that the federal government so poorly trained its employees that they eagerly agreed with the unsubstantiated claims of the WHO in the face of evidence to the contrary.
Forced vaccination would violate the Fourth Amendment of the Constitution by allowing the government to enter homes and force people to be vaccinated, or to forcibly remove people to another location for vaccination. It would also violate Fifth Amendment Constitutional rights by depriving people of liberty without due process of law.
Vawter charged that the federal government has engaged in gross negligence by failing to properly investigate factual evidence submitted by esteemed medical professions over many years which proves flu vaccines have caused serious damage to people. The CDC has stated that thimerosal mercury is being used in the new flu vaccines being prepared.
The government has failed to investigate profiteering. Billions of dollars in vaccine sales can cause organizations to falsify threats so as to cause unwarranted public hysteria leading to forced vaccinations.
The government is guilty of gross negligence because its employees failed to properly investigate the release of a case of live swine flu virus. One of the main companies the government deals with, Baxter Vaccines, was apparently involved in the transporting of live bird flu virus that was released on a public train earlier this year. A lab technician with the Swiss National Center for Influenza in Geneva had traveled to Zurich to collect eight ampoules, five of which were filled with the H1N1 swine flu virus. However, failure of the dry ice in their container allowed pressure to build up, and the ampoules exploded as the train was pulling into a station.
The highly reputable UK newspaper "the Telegraph" reported on July 2nd that flu vaccines tested on homeless people caused twenty-one of them to die.
Vawter charged there is a preponderance of evidence to show that government will not provide people being vaccinated with a list of the vaccine ingredients and possible negative side effects before they are vaccinated. Most of the public will not know this flu vaccine contains thimerosal mercury.
Vawter submitted an Order to force the government to publish vaccine ingredients and side effects, and to give this information to everyone who takes a flu vaccine, and do so at least 3 days prior to their vaccination. A denial of this order would violate Plaintiff's rights to demand the government obey the First Amendment of the U.S. Constitution by requiring it to engage in freedom of speech. The First Amendment not only allows a citizen to have freedom of speech himself, but it allows a citizen to demand his government engage in freedom of speech when it is promoting the use of such as these vaccinations to the public.
The government proclamation stating a person cannot sue for any damages he receives from the flu vaccine, completely bypasses the congress and the court system in violation of the Seventh Amendment of the Constitution which grants the right to sue to recover for damages. Vawter submitted an Order to deem unconstitutional any proclamation, rule or similar law that forbids people from suing for damages resulting from the vaccines of 2009 and 2010.
Vawter is seeking damages of $100,000.00 as the result of suffering depression, extreme anxiety and emotional duress when his nephew began life as a healthy, happy baby boy, only to come down with autism after being given baby vaccines that contained thimerosal mercury. For years his nephew has struggled with this incredibly debilitating, preventable condition. According to Vawter, a claim may be submitted not only by his nephew, but by others who have suffered damages from vaccinations.
Vawter claimed that several rules and proclamations detailed in the lawsuit are unconstitutional and claimed that if they are not stricken and amended, he and other people who may not be aware of the offenses or who may be unable to sue, will suffer pending "injury-in-fact" damages. As attorneys and law firms join this lawsuit, recovery requests will reveal the names of additional people who have suffered injuries so they can be contacted about recovering damages, as the law allows.
Motion for Preliminary Injunction claims some vaccines may contain live virus
Although much of the Preliminary Injunction is a reiteration of information contained in his lawsuit, there are a few additions of note. Vawter includes in his grounds the fact that since the manufacturing of flu vaccines involves first destroying a live flu virus, there is a possibility that live flu virus will be in some of the vaccines, causing even more damages to people who receive it, and spreading the virus.
He asked the Court to use federal law enforcement to initiate its own civil and criminal investigation into flu vaccine safety issue, as federal law allows for this.
He noted the days when Hitler's Nazi doctors forcibly gave shots containing adjuvants to innocent people, and reminded that Nazi ideology was stamped out precisely because of those atrocities. He claims it is unwise for the U.S. government to follow in the same path as the Nazis. America is a nation of civil laws, not a dictatorship that gives proclamations bypassing the courts and congress to demand forced vaccinations containing hazardous ingredients known to cause damages.
The forced vaccination debacle of 1976 that the government had to halt because it was injuring more people than it was protecting shows vaccine makers should not be allowed to force their vaccines on people who have no recourse. The prohibition against lawsuits by the injured gives the green light to vaccine makers to include thimerosal mercury in their new flu vaccines. When the Order deeming the forbidding of lawsuits as unconstitutional is given, any defendant will have to present factual proof in federal court, not just hearsay or advertising slogans, as so why the Constitution says it is okay to forbid people from suing to recover damages resulting from flu vaccine.
Medical professionals argue flu vaccines harm not just certain people but almost everyone who receives them. Yet the government has ignored factual evidence proving this, and instead listens to a profit run group of vaccine manufacturers who stand to earn billions of dollars as the government orders forced vaccinations on the public for the coming flu season.
The government has published a chart listing the WHO's "Phase 6 Influenza Pandemic" as being equal to an earthquake measuring 8.0 on the Richter Scale. This chart is preposterous because there are no factual criteria required for an "Influenza Pandemic" to be declared by the United Nations' WHO. The United Nations is a collective of numerous nations, most of whom have very different laws than the U.S. has, and where their leaders can simply declare or proclaim things to be so without judicial review, and their population must obey.
Glaxo Smith Kline stands to make $4 billion from its two flu vaccine drugs. CEO Andrew Witty has said his company has been preparing for a flu pandemic for thee years and has spent over $1 billion to expand its factories. Executives from Glaxo, Baxter, Novartis, and Sanofi Pasteur had seats at the advisory group that on July 13th recommended mandatory H1N1 vaccination for everyone in all 194 countries belonging to the WHO.
The fear mongering involved with this Phase 6 alert has been intense. An example being spread by interested parties is the story of a girl in England purported by the WHO to have died of swine flu because she was not vaccinated. A more thorough investigation later revealed the girl actually died of septic shock due to tonsillitis. The WHO, CDC and numerous vaccine companies have been extensively advertising dire yet apparently concocted warnings of flu pandemics. Yet only a small number of people worldwide have died from the new flu virus.
When influential TV newscasters questioned the WHO proclaiming a "Phase 6 Influenza Pandemic" without factual evidence to prove it, the WHO responded by simply stopping their tracking of swine flu cases, a bizarre behavior on the part of an organization designated to be the main hub for information gathering on the disease.
Reminds me of a lot of the bird flu hype from 2005-06.
CONGRATULATIONS!!!!!
sign up date dec 2007
nothing no posts nothing till
aug2009
hmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm
What kind of one sided slanted news do you read?
There are 2 sides to this don’t ya know.
Why not quit your job and become a cheerleader for getting
the vaccine.
Must be a stockholder.
thats good news
sign up date dec 2007
nothing no posts nothing till
aug2009
Freedommom, why are you posting lies?
Yefragetuwrabrumuy has posted almost every day since he/ she registered on FR.
freedommom
Since Jun 2, 2008
That was the information I saw when I looked at that profile.
I saw one page of posts and that was it.
I just tried again and got the same result.
If he/she posts every day then I stand corrected but I posted from what I can see.
I’m still getting same response . One page of posts.
You are posting yet another lie. I just checked yefragetuwrabrumuy’s posting history and it goes back further than I have time to review.
Not only that, I have pinged him/ her to flu articles for over a year. The reason I remember is because of the unusual screen name that I can’t spell, and have to look up every time I ping.
I am NOT a liar.
I told you I stand corrected if I am wrong.
On my computer there is only one page of posts.
The “hype” as you call it started in about 2003, with the publication of a major paper outlining the threat of this new strain. And even though you lost interest in it, the world medical community hasn’t.
Since that time, preparation for an eventual outbreak of H5N1 to an easily transmitted human to human strain has been continual. Even highly controlled and isolationist nations like North Korea are taking it as uniquely serious.
In that time, the disease has now become endemic to East Asia, expanding its territory in China, a different clade is menacing Bangladesh, which could emerge to devastate the world’s domestic and farm animals. And a third clade has succeeded in uniquely entering the pediatric population in Egypt, unlike other clades, in a less lethal manner, which enables it to more easily combine with human influenza strains.
What has limited its emergence among large human populations is that it reproduces in the lower trachea, and some internal organs, which is rarely done with other strains of influenza. But there is a different cell type in the upper RT and sinuses, and if the Avian flu can adapt to it, it can be easily spread by coughing and sneezing.
Also uniquely, it has maintained a 60% mortality rate in those affected. This is heightened by the cytokine storm effect, in which an immune system overreaction destroys the lungs. This is so profound that a physician can tell if an afflicted person will die from a chest X-ray.
The top lethality of the Spanish flu in 1918 was between 10-20%, and it so traumatized most Americans that they created a social taboo from discussing in, and most tried to block it out of their memories.
So while you think it is “hype”, the truth of the matter is that it remains the single most important biological threat that the United States has ever faced.
I researched your name and I found only one page of posts.
I jumped to the conclusion that you signed up aug07.
I have since learned I was WRONG.
I would never say that if I didn’t think that was true.
I am sorry if my post angered you.
You need to do COMPLETE research on this topic and not just swallow the mainstream cool aide and then act like an expert. Vaccinations are harmful and often surpress the immune system or cause it to attack the body. Thimerisol is harmful. Squalene is harmful. There are several things that can be taken for this virus or any other virus and other suppliments that boost the immune system and kill viruses, that cause you no harm, but Big Pharma doesn’t want us to know about them because they cannot patent them and make billions off of them. Vaccines have killed more people than the flu during every major outbreak. Modern medicine is more about making money and less about taking care of us than we are led to believe. There are now several mainstream modern MDs that are publicizing the health hazzards of vaccines like Dr. Mercola, Dr. William Campbell Douglass, Dr. Blaylock, etc. Please get all the facts before you act like an expert.
If there is more than one page of posts, at the bottom of the most recent posts, it will say "next page".
Click on that to bring up older posts. yefragetuwrabrumuy has been around for a while and has posted numerous valuable insights, imho.
There is enough incoming without 'friendly fire'...
I did all you said .I clicked next page. I saw this
Your query returned no results.
I thought that what I saw in front of my eyes was the truth.
I will say it once more I am sorry that I posted ye as being
a newbie.
I have apologized to him on this forum and I will do so by mail.
Dr. Joseph Mercola, Doctor of Osteopathy
Dr. William Campbell Douglass, who abhors vegetarianism, but recommends coffee, cigars, not exercising, drinking hydrogen peroxide, and eating high fat diets to ward off cancer. Seriously. I did not make this up.
Dr. Russell Blaylock, ex-neurosurgeon, now nutritionist. Not a typical career path.
None of these individuals have any specialist training in epidemiology, microbiology, or virology, and their opinions rate somewhere between “unlearned” and “fruitcake”. They also have a vested interest in selling their various homeopathic products to the gullible public.
In short, they have no credibility in the subject, individually or collectively.
Things have been a mite quirky of late. It does not hurt to be vigillant, either, though.
Excerpt:
* * * Editor's Note: It has come to our attention that the following article is factually incorrect. It was written by a contributing writer, then approved by an in-house editor who did not catch the significant errors in this article. As a result of these significant errors, and due to our commitment to publishing only true and accurate information to the best of our ability, we have made an editorial decision to reject further articles from this author. NaturalNews deeply regrets this unintentional error, and we are brainstorming new ways to put in place tighter fact-checking oversight so that the same mistake does not happen again in the future. We thank all those who have brought this important matter to our attention, and we pledge to increase our efforts to reject stories that contain factual inaccuracies. We only include the full text of the story below so that readers may reference what the original article incorrectly stated, even though we now know the article is factually incorrect. Thank you, - Mike Adams, editor of NaturalNews * * *
Which means What ! . . . Exactly. Was an injunction issued. Or not ___________- ?
This H1N1 vaccine is rumored to be very nasty stuff. Medical reports say those that are inoculated will shed active Swine Flu Virus for five weeks. The active virus will be shed into the water supply and in work areas, school areas and other surroundings.
Many reasonable people will refuse to take the shots. Making them prime candidates for immediate arrest under Martial Law. Are means isolation. Which means detention and forced inoculation by US or UN troops.
I feel very fortunate to live on 122acre spot in Texas with
2 natural springs. (and all the survival stuff to go with it)I guess I'll wait there until they pick me up.
BUT
I have a lonnnng driveway which I may turn into a human ratzapper!
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.