I wish with all my heart the alleged Kenya BC was the real deal however when you look at this one even the book and page number they are identical. It is time to move on.
Assuming the Bomford paper is the "template"...how in the world could the Kenyan one wind up with what look like aged or worn fold marks clearly in different positions on the paper, and a different number of folds? Wouldn't the copy carry over those folds as well? Or, are those folds readily "removed?"
Since Australia in 1959 used the same forms as Britain, and Kenya was under the control of Britain until 1963 or 64 then it’s entirely possible that both documents are archived in London in the same book.
The problem I see is the G.F. Lavender and E.F. Lavender.
As well as M.H. Miller and J.H. Miller.
Unless, for some strange reason or quirk of fate, their sons or daughters went to Kenya in 1961 and 1964 and became the ‘Registrar’ and ‘District Registar’.
Possibly? Could be.
Probable? Not likely.
I wish with all my heart the alleged Kenya BC was the real deal however when you look at this one even the book and page number they are identical. It is time to move on.
+++++++++++++++
If this is the template (post #291), then that explains the 7s, 6d currency discrepancy also. It also proves, if true, just how tough it is to counterfeit such a document well. I’d call this one a pretty good fake.