First off, thats a coin from 1938, not 1958.
I am from Adelaide, the home of the Bomford certificate. Its real. And to prove it, heres an interview with David Bomford on ABC Radio Adelaide - http://www.abc.net.au/pm/content/2008/s2646009.htm
Listen to that interview more carefully. It is obvious that Mr. Bomford didn't have his original copy of that web image to compare the critical details. He merely compared the basic facts about himself from his own memory to those on the image (which do match the data on the image), not the inserted document numbers or clerk's name (which were inserted by the forgers into image of his BC).
“I am from Adelaide, the home of the Bomford certificate. Its real. And to prove it, heres an interview with David Bomford on ABC Radio Adelaide”
“mikizee
Since Aug 4, 2009”
signing up to FR today to let us know?
Sorry, got my dates wrong.
And I know it was a coin, I’m not that big of an idiot. It was just an example of the South Australia coat of arms.
Welcome to FR bookmark.
“First off, thats a coin from 1938, not 1958.
I am from Adelaide, the home of the Bomford certificate. Its real. And to prove it, heres an interview with David Bomford on ABC Radio Adelaide - http://www.abc.net.au/pm/content/2008/s2646009.htm";
Interesting, mikizee just registered today in order to impart this piece of information. Is this some old obot’s new handle? So I thought I’ll register too. Color me skeptical about David Bomford’s interview. He probably has no idea that the website was hacked and has no memory of what his original birth certificate looks like (neither do I). He looks at the forged birth certificate, sees all the correct information - so it looks OK to him. Consequently, he gets outraged that someone used his document to forge Obama’s BC.
It doesn’t prove it. It certainly increases the likelihood that it’s real, and, if it’s real, that the kenyan doc is fake.
Bomford could 1) be lying or 2) not have caught the small modifications (miller, lavender, 44B 5733) to a real doc that would call the kenyan doc into question or 3) not even looked at the doc recently or 4) something else.
On the wayback machine, there was a link to the doc, so some doc was there a couple years ago. This aussie bomford is not necessarily responsible for the webpage.
Bomford.net could’ve been hacked by an outsider - the slightly modified doc replacing the original - or the replacement could have been done by a Bomford who has legitimate access to bomford.net.
Yes, the Bomford interview increases the likelihood that the Bomford doc is a valid, unmodified doc, but it doesn’t prove it.
Welcome, troll boy. How’s the weather down under?
Today signup date.
I am thinking that the David Bomford is in on this deal because his alleged doc is photoshopped.
Oops, she be gone already.
The Bomford birth certificate is an abject fraud, as has been conclusively proven on this very thread.
And Bomford himself is obviously in on the con job, as he has vouched for it’s validity. He’d better be able to produce the real paper document, is all I have to say.
So, you sign up at FR today to come here and defend this?
Pardon me, if I don’t immediately give you a hardy welcome and the keys to the executive lounge.