Posted on 07/29/2009 11:58:07 AM PDT by bareford101
Both Americamustknow.com and yourfellowcitizen.com are reporting on a couple of places in Democratic party rules where the party seems to explicitly admit that they are responsible for the proper vetting and, subsequently, nominating eligible candidates.
All of this seems to tie in nicely with what House Speaker Nancy Pelosi had certified as Barack Obam being duly nominated for the party.
Read on for more info and links…
Page 18 of the national party rules states, in part:
K. 1. Based on the right of the Democratic Party to freely assemble and to determine the criteria for its candidates, it is determined that all candidates for the Democratic nomination for President or Vice President shall:
a. be registered to vote, and shall have been registered to vote in the last election for the office of President and Vice President; and
b. have demonstrated a commitment to the goals and objectives of the Democratic Party as determined by the National Chair and will participate in the Convention in good faith.
2. It is further determined that these requirements are in addition to the requirements set forth by the United States Constitution and any law of the United States. (emphasis added)
Further, here is the PDF of a letter to the South Carolina Election Commission from the SC State Party Chair, Carol Fowler, explaining that it’s allegedly their responsibility to determine eligibility of candidates.
what’s wrong with Nancy’s handwriting? loooks like she had a few before she this.... there’s some mistake in that signature- it’s the “N” part
Hehe Its NANCY’S FAULT!
Just looking at it, seems like
the pen didn’t write at first.
Hua what??
Ayep!
Writing Letter to Hawai’i Department of Health releasing all birth records - Zero Dollars
Walking to fax machine and sending fax - Zero Dollars.
Ending the controversy - Priceless
Instead, Barak Obama spends 1 Million Dollars NOT to.
You do the math.
WHY ON EARTH WOULD THERE BE TWO OF THEM?
Oh you know she will blame it on the CIA or how she wasn’t properly briefed about it!
Here is the actual document sent to the state Election Commissioners certifying the DNC convention nomination. Pelosi was Chairman. In my view she should have vetted him but the question was raised that he was the bonefide nominee based on the primary process.
This document was provided to me by the lawyer for the Tennessee Elections Commissioner
The question then becomes, who checks out those running in the primary.
I wonder ...
Why is that?
Check your pings
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.