Posted on 07/27/2009 11:12:35 AM PDT by Danae
Ok...scratch one “expert witness.”
So that link gets pulled. Interesting. Maybe the mods know more about that guy who’s got it in for you than we do. Mostly it’s a gigantic ad hominem attack, so I can see how it wouldn’t be allowed.
Where is my apology?
“gigantic ad hominem attack”
I have no idea what posts you are talking about, I never saw them, however, Polarik attacked me with no cause, and also happens to be completely wrong in his analysis and conclusions.
That was allowed.
Frankly his assessment that a real document from the state of Hawaii is a fake calls into question his credibility far more than it does mine. Oh and the Receipt for the order of that COLB in 2000 the only one ever ordered, from the Hawaiian Department of Health has not yet arrived. I expect it late in the week.
The thread was pulled. What did the posting troll try to pass off at FR?
Well, I know what the official in the Vital Records told me about the numbering ID in the lower left of the exhibit you posted. Either you are mistaken as to when you recieved the document (the form would not have gone into use more than a year before the dating on the document form so you could not have gotten a document with that coding more than a year before it was put into use, 11/01); or someone in Hawaii Vital Records doesn't know what their own document information means.
I think I'll go with the Hawaiian Vital Reords being correct on their own codes and let you alone for a while in your stew. But you keep attacking Ron Polarik and I'll make the call again and record the answer and put it up on the Internet to let folks decide regarding your credulity.
Hey there ...
so, when I post up the reciept and maybe even the emails I have sent back and forth to the Vital Records Department (who is right now officially investigating the meaning of the numbers for me), you gonna apologize to me yourself?
I will happily ALSO post up the envelope they send me the receipt in. As of this afternoon, it has not arrived, and as I said earlier, I do not expect it until Saturday at the earliest.
I have not outted Polarik, he has discredited himself by calling a real document a fraud. Thats HIS problem. Given his venom and yours, no, I am not going to back down from the truth.
If Polarik can’t tell the difference between a real document with an error on it, and a fake one, then he is absolutely in the wrong field.
You are an absolute joke. If you ACTUALLY think I am capable of creating the document I have in my possession, creating a forgery... they you had better back off what ever it is you are smokin, because the suggestion is absolutely INSANE.
Have a nice evening.
Bump for later ........
Apparently I can’t even post the link, in this thread my comments #339 and 340 were pulled because they had the link.
Why do you call Techwriter a troll?
have no idea what posts you are talking about, I never saw them,
***The thread was pulled, along with my comments with the links to the original source. The information was kinda consistent with what you have been saying in this thread.
however, Polarik attacked me with no cause,
***I think he had cause. Everyone thought that it was highly improbable that you would receive a 2001 document in the year 2000. And it’s still unexplained why it has a 2007 stamp on it. So I wouldn’t say he had no cause.
and also happens to be completely wrong in his analysis and conclusions.
***That may be correct. There are others on this board who have qualifications as good as or maybe even better than Polarik, but they seem to have preferred silence rather than risk their analysis proven wrong.
That was allowed.
Frankly his assessment that a real document from the state of Hawaii is a fake calls into question his credibility far more than it does mine.
***Assuming what you say is true, I agree, which is why I said that no matter how this turns out, you have generated a very useful data point.
Oh and the Receipt for the order of that COLB in 2000 the only one ever ordered, from the Hawaiian Department of Health has not yet arrived. I expect it late in the week.
***If the receipt says that it was the only one ever ordered, then how did a 2007 datestamp show up on it? It was supposedly prima facie legal evidence, but it was invalid for 7 years.
If the receipt says that it was the only one ever ordered, then how did a 2007 datestamp show up on it? It was supposedly prima facie legal evidence, but it was invalid for 7 years.
That is precisely my question to them. However, no one I presented it to questioned it in the least.
Believe me, they are looking at scanned copies of what I have, I have emailed them front and back copies. To say that it is concerning is an understatement. Honestly I am damn glad I never ran into problems with it. Its amazing really that I didn’t!
Like I said, the receipt is in the mail and I can guarantee that the 2000 entry will be the only one on there because thats the only one that has been ordered. Anything else would leave me floored on a level that would make me question my own sanity.
Okay, let’s say that everything you say is 100% verifiable. What does that mean? Does this mean that it’s more likely that Obama has gamed this obviously fallible system in some way? Your corner overlap borders on the BC look like zer0bama’s, which is a focus of this controversy. I think it’s possible that there was a stash of these blank BC’s lying around that were destined for the trash heap but got set aside for “just in case we run out” or maybe even nefarious purposes.
Ok... I have been through every post on this thread, and I think perhaps it was at 348 or 349 which got pulled by the mod. I am still looking for it, I know I posted it because I also posted the Receipts from the State of Hawaii. I took a bunch of stuff down off the internet, including those receipts, If you REALLY want those then I will privately email em to you. But the apology was included with the posts with the receipts.
As for all that, I think Obama has a legit COLB. I don’t think he paperwork behind that COLB are legit. It is what is in his vital records that he refuses to release that the real important stuff lay. The COLB is more or less irrelevant. What allowed him to GET one is.
Looks to me like 348 and 349 are still here. It was 339 and 340 that were pulled, and they were MY posts linking to a URL that questioned Polarik’s veracity.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.