“gigantic ad hominem attack”
I have no idea what posts you are talking about, I never saw them, however, Polarik attacked me with no cause, and also happens to be completely wrong in his analysis and conclusions.
That was allowed.
Frankly his assessment that a real document from the state of Hawaii is a fake calls into question his credibility far more than it does mine. Oh and the Receipt for the order of that COLB in 2000 the only one ever ordered, from the Hawaiian Department of Health has not yet arrived. I expect it late in the week.
Well, I know what the official in the Vital Records told me about the numbering ID in the lower left of the exhibit you posted. Either you are mistaken as to when you recieved the document (the form would not have gone into use more than a year before the dating on the document form so you could not have gotten a document with that coding more than a year before it was put into use, 11/01); or someone in Hawaii Vital Records doesn't know what their own document information means.
I think I'll go with the Hawaiian Vital Reords being correct on their own codes and let you alone for a while in your stew. But you keep attacking Ron Polarik and I'll make the call again and record the answer and put it up on the Internet to let folks decide regarding your credulity.
have no idea what posts you are talking about, I never saw them,
***The thread was pulled, along with my comments with the links to the original source. The information was kinda consistent with what you have been saying in this thread.
however, Polarik attacked me with no cause,
***I think he had cause. Everyone thought that it was highly improbable that you would receive a 2001 document in the year 2000. And it’s still unexplained why it has a 2007 stamp on it. So I wouldn’t say he had no cause.
and also happens to be completely wrong in his analysis and conclusions.
***That may be correct. There are others on this board who have qualifications as good as or maybe even better than Polarik, but they seem to have preferred silence rather than risk their analysis proven wrong.
That was allowed.
Frankly his assessment that a real document from the state of Hawaii is a fake calls into question his credibility far more than it does mine.
***Assuming what you say is true, I agree, which is why I said that no matter how this turns out, you have generated a very useful data point.
Oh and the Receipt for the order of that COLB in 2000 the only one ever ordered, from the Hawaiian Department of Health has not yet arrived. I expect it late in the week.
***If the receipt says that it was the only one ever ordered, then how did a 2007 datestamp show up on it? It was supposedly prima facie legal evidence, but it was invalid for 7 years.