Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Drudge Story on Pork Draws Ire from President Obama's Agriculture Chief
nydailynews.com ^ | July 21st 2009 | David Saltonstall

Posted on 07/22/2009 11:34:13 AM PDT by kellynla

Sometimes, federal pork is just that - pork.

Internet newsman Matt Drudge drew squeals of anger from President Obama's agriculture chief on Monday after his Drudge Report Web site revealed the feds spent millions of stimulus dollars on piglet-sized pork products.

One contract, listed on the government's recovery.gov Web site, indicated that federal bean counters had spent $1.19 million for "2 pound frozen ham sliced." An additional $16.7 million contract was earmarked simply for "canned pork."

But Agriculture Secretary Tom Vilsack insisted Monday that the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act contracts were all, er, kosher, and dismissed Drudge's take as pure slop.

The purchases for sliced ham and other contracts - including mozzarella and other cheeses - were to provide soup kitchens and homeless shelters with food for the needy.

And governmentese references to 2 pounds of frozen ham and other sizes was to the products' packaging, not the overall amount of food purchased.

In fact, the Agriculture Department purchased some 760,000 pounds of ham with that $1.19 million - a cost of about $1.50 a pound, Vilsack said.

"This program will help reduce hunger of those hardest hit by the current economic recession," insisted Vilsack, the former Democratic governor of Iowa - the nation's No. 1 pork producer.

Vilsack further argued that buying hams for poor people would stimulate the economy, in line with Obama's $787 billion stimulus package.

"While the principal purpose of these expenditures is to provide food to those hardest hit by these tough times," Vilsack said, "the purchases also provide a modest economic benefit ... [to] food retailers, manufacturers and transportation companies as well as the farmers and ranchers who produce our food supply."

(Excerpt) Read more at nydailynews.com ...


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Culture/Society; Extended News; Government
KEYWORDS: agriculture; bhousda; drudge; obama; pork; vilsack
"By the end of the day - after Drudge spotlighted the contracts - it appeared that words had been changed on the recovery.gov Web site.

References to ham and pork appeared to become the more generic "meat, poultry and fish," while mozzarella and other cheeses became "dairy foods and eggs."

1 posted on 07/22/2009 11:34:14 AM PDT by kellynla
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: kellynla

This is a product of the sick arrogance and incompetence we are suffering from.


2 posted on 07/22/2009 11:36:43 AM PDT by EagleUSA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kellynla

Everyday there’s something. It’s like us against them. These people were elected by us. They serve us. We need term limits plain and simple.


3 posted on 07/22/2009 11:36:49 AM PDT by nikos1121
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kellynla
Feeding the homeless is noble, but how does it stimulate the economy? The soup-kitchen workers are already there, the food is already produced.

-PJ

4 posted on 07/22/2009 11:37:55 AM PDT by Political Junkie Too (This just in... Voting Republican is a Terrorist act!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kellynla
I did have to laugh when Vilsack came up with the $1.50 /lb number because of Drudge, and under it he posted Food Lion $.79 /lb...
5 posted on 07/22/2009 11:40:24 AM PDT by Abathar (Proudly posting without reading the article carefully since 2004)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Political Junkie Too

it gives the homeless the energy they need to buy Colt .45, weed, and make it to the methadone clinics on time.


6 posted on 07/22/2009 11:41:19 AM PDT by thefactor (yes, as a matter of fact, i DID only read the excerpt)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: kellynla
Is this "chief" a czar or the Cabinet person?

Can't keep track these days.

7 posted on 07/22/2009 11:41:33 AM PDT by what's up
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kellynla

8 posted on 07/22/2009 11:42:16 AM PDT by xcamel (The urge to save humanity is always a false front for the urge to rule it. - H. L. Mencken)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kellynla

Of course, the “journalist” so intent on exposing Drudge didn’t seem to bother to ask where this particular pork actually went, just accepting the claim it went to the “homeless.”


9 posted on 07/22/2009 11:46:09 AM PDT by colorado tanker ("Lastly, I'd like to apologize for America's disproportionate response to Pearl Harbor . . . ")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Abathar

Wow. Could have at almost half the cost with that idea.


10 posted on 07/22/2009 11:49:19 AM PDT by rwfromkansas ("Carve your name on hearts, not marble." - C.H. Spurgeon)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: kellynla

I always told my kids when they were growing up: “Say what you mean and mean what you say.” Words have precise meanings - wether written or spoken. If the language is “governmentese” for package size, then the total amount must be indicated somewhere - or it will be taken literally. Imagine if someone was granted that money, read the grant and delivered PRECISELY what it said. No court of law would hold him to blame and he’d get the money.

In the Merchant of Venice, Shylock is entitled to his pound of flesh - but could draw not a drop of blood. Don’t they ever learn?


11 posted on 07/22/2009 11:50:01 AM PDT by NTHockey (Rules of engagement #1: Take no prisoners.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kellynla
"dismissed Drudge's take as pure slop.".... Sorry there Vilecrap!...but it looks like the slop's at your end!
12 posted on 07/22/2009 11:52:48 AM PDT by AngelesCrestHighway
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kellynla

Vilsack further argued that buying hams for poor people would stimulate the economy, in line with Obama’s $787 billion stimulus package.
“While the principal purpose of these expenditures is to provide food to those hardest hit by these tough times,” Vilsack said, “the purchases also provide a modest economic benefit ... [to] food retailers, manufacturers and transportation companies as well as the farmers and ranchers who produce our food supply

Lying just comes so easy to these assclowns..
$1.50 a pound divied between food retailers, manufacturers,transportaion companies,farmers and ranchers etc. is somewhat LESS then a modest economic benfit to anyone....
All that money spent DID NOT in any manner stilulate the economy


13 posted on 07/22/2009 11:56:16 AM PDT by SECURE AMERICA (Coming to You From the Front Lines of Occupied America)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kellynla

Thanks Vilsak, but why wasn’t the stuff bought out the usual Agriculture budget? Why use the stimulus money?


14 posted on 07/22/2009 11:59:22 AM PDT by Deb (Beat him, strip him and bring him to my tent!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rwfromkansas

At least half the cost, or more with that volume just going to Sam’s Club.

But that is far too logical for the idiots in Washington to figure out.


15 posted on 07/22/2009 12:03:52 PM PDT by Abathar (Proudly posting without reading the article carefully since 2004)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Abathar
But where did they buy it? And who owns the "store"?

They are the ones being economically stimulated.

Its not about return on investment, its who is being "stimulated".

16 posted on 07/22/2009 5:44:32 PM PDT by mountn man (The pleasure you get from life, is equal to the attitude you put into it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: AdmSmith; Berosus; bigheadfred; Convert from ECUSA; dervish; Ernest_at_the_Beach; Fred Nerks; ...
Image and video hosting by TinyPic "Die Infidels!"

17 posted on 07/22/2009 7:49:21 PM PDT by SunkenCiv (https://secure.freerepublic.com/donate/__Since Jan 3, 2004__Profile updated Monday, January 12, 2009)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SunkenCiv

With all the pork we’re talking about, it makes me wish that Obama was a more observant Moslem.


18 posted on 07/23/2009 2:41:47 AM PDT by Berosus (I wish I had as much faith in God as liberals have in government.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: Berosus

I ham in full agreement with that. Of course, we don’t know what he does in private, i.e., whether he spends part of the day on a prayer rug facing Mecca inside the White House.


19 posted on 07/23/2009 12:19:17 PM PDT by SunkenCiv (https://secure.freerepublic.com/donate/__Since Jan 3, 2004__Profile updated Monday, January 12, 2009)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson