To: Kozak
It wouldn’t occur to you to actually contest the article and disprove it, now would it?
Or are spitwads just that much easier?
9 posted on
07/17/2009 9:35:06 AM PDT by
metmom
(Welfare was never meant to be a career choice.)
To: metmom
Have you noticed that most of the time the evos can’t contest with facts. For example, I still haven’t seen an inteligent evo answer to the irreducibly complex systems, that’s why they resort to name calling and drive by posts.
To: metmom
As "reported" in the Creationist "journal".
A set of fossilized Tyrannosaurus rex teeth was found in a rock layer that it had no business being in
The ACTUAL headline of the article in Japan Today
Teeth of tyrannosaurus ancestor dating back 140 mil years found in Hyogo
26 posted on
07/17/2009 9:54:14 AM PDT by
Kozak
(USA 7/4/1776 to 1/20/2009 Reqiescat in Pace)
To: metmom
Well? Got a factual response to post #26? No. Didn’t think so.
71 posted on
07/17/2009 10:53:00 AM PDT by
Kozak
(USA 7/4/1776 to 1/20/2009 Reqiescat in Pace)
To: metmom
It wouldn’t occur to you to actually contest the article and disprove it, now would it?Seeing how the article puts forth no facts to support its claims, there is nothing to dispute. Just another ICR non-science bloat.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson