Have you noticed that most of the time the evos can’t contest with facts. For example, I still haven’t seen an inteligent evo answer to the irreducibly complex systems, that’s why they resort to name calling and drive by posts.
re: complexity, I saw Richard Dawkins on British tv saw that evolution is sooooooo awesome, because it gives “the illusion of design”.
How’s that for brilliant, deep, philosophical and unbiased hard-headed thinking?
The announcer didn’t think to ask him,”how do you know it’s an illusion?”.
Most of the Cretins wouldn’t recognize science if it bit them on the a##.
No. I haven't noticed that.
Specifically, as to the ID argument that "irreducibly complex systems" (systems in which each part is functionally crucial such that no part can be removed) cannot possibly be assembled in stepwise, incremental fashion, with each intervening step useful and functional in itself -- this has been cogently disproved and debunked many, many times in print. Two or three dozen examples are linked HERE.