Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

FR discussion: Obama birth announcement in Honolulu paper, a must read (read it all, esp the end)

Posted on 07/17/2009 5:30:11 AM PDT by cycle of discernment

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100101 next last
To: cycle of discernment

Even if he was born in the whitehouse, he is not natural born because his daddy was Kenyan.

End of story.


61 posted on 07/17/2009 9:32:02 AM PDT by devistate one four (Back by popular demand: America love or leave it (GTFOOMC) TET68)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: allmendream

How do you, or anyone else for that matter, know that he was born on August 4, 1961? Just because he said so? He’s lied about everything else, why would you think he’s telling the truth about his birth date? No one has seen his real birth certificate, so how do we even know the date is right?

We don’t know his real name, who his father really is, where he was born, or even if his birth date is correct.

Once a liar, always a liar. That’s why he has to use a teleprompter - so he can keep his stories straight. And then he can’t even get it right where he met Michelle! A normal person knows where he/she met his/her spouse! Only a liar or someone heavily involved in drug usage could forget or make up that important little factoid.


62 posted on 07/17/2009 9:54:21 AM PDT by nanetteclaret (Unreconstructed Catholic Texan)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 55 | View Replies]

To: stockpirate; Fred Nerks; null and void; george76; PhilDragoo; Candor7; BP2; MeekOneGOP; ...
Thanks, stockpirate.

FR discussion: Obama birth announcement in Honolulu paper, a must read (read it all, esp the end)

Ping to article. Don't miss #43.

.

63 posted on 07/17/2009 10:24:52 AM PDT by LucyT (If it's not on FR, it didn't happen. --JimRob)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Maine Mariner
Marriage is such a bourgeois concept. I see the good doctor wasn't married either.
64 posted on 07/17/2009 10:28:04 AM PDT by Oratam
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: Lovely-Day-For-A-Guinness
Obamas real name ... is .... DAMIAN.
65 posted on 07/17/2009 10:29:59 AM PDT by PA-RIVER
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: ZULU
Obama is a slick guy, maybe slicker than Clinton, but he is presssing a losing agenda - one doomed to fail.

I know to pull this off obama appears to be slick. But one slick person could not do this on his own. Obama has supporters, czars and administration who have been in politics for ages and they know every angle to protect Obama's lies. Obama is evil and would like to think he is this slick but he is a coward hiding behind the likes of axelrod, rahm, george soros and the rest of commies who have planned America's takeover for years.

I mean to the point they all wrote books saying how they planned the takeover.

66 posted on 07/17/2009 10:43:29 AM PDT by OafOfOffice (Constitution is not neutral.It was designed to take the government off the backs of people-Douglas)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: cycle of discernment

I believe the part about the $ spent with law firms to avoid showing the BC - where do you have documentation for this, though? Where’s the proof?

There’s so much info flying around about this, so many threads, claims, counter-claims, new developments, etc., that I really think it’s imperative that everything possible be verified and supported with documentation or verifiable sources that hold the public records for things like this.

Without proper documentation, all we really have is hearsay, which - coupled with a buck - will get you a cup of coffee at the nearest deli.

JG


67 posted on 07/17/2009 11:10:55 AM PDT by Jacksonian Grouch (God has granted us Freedom; we owe Him our courage in return)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: allmendream

You are a joke with an agenda.

Go take a nap.


68 posted on 07/17/2009 11:13:08 AM PDT by cycle of discernment
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 58 | View Replies]

To: Republic
$900,000 K - where's the proof? You know the standards for Conservatives is much higher than for the left - when these lemming dhimmis point their fingers and laugh at us, the best way to shut them up is with FACTS and the verifiable TRUTH.
69 posted on 07/17/2009 11:19:54 AM PDT by Jacksonian Grouch (God has granted us Freedom; we owe Him our courage in return)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 52 | View Replies]

To: xjcsa
After zer0 finishes passing all his agendas we will be forever known as Nomoreica
70 posted on 07/17/2009 11:31:50 AM PDT by Citizen Soldier (Just got up from Bedroomshire)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: cycle of discernment
My agenda is NOT to spread lies.

Is your agenda to spread lies?

So “birthers” not only don't police themselves and pass on ABSOLUTE GARBAGE as if it were gospel, they also attack anyone who dares point out the lies and misstatements.

Obama was NOT one year old when the birth announcement came out.

71 posted on 07/17/2009 11:32:25 AM PDT by allmendream ("Wealth is EARNED not distributed, so how could it be redistributed?")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 68 | View Replies]

To: Jacksonian Grouch
For Obama's Aug. 4, 1961 birth in Honolulu, HA, to be accurate, the following improbable events needed to occur for his COLB to accurate:

1 month after starting classes, Stanley Ann Dunham, Barack’s mom, at age 17, got pregnant by just-about the only black African man on the entire chain of Hawaiian islands (the 1960 Census shows the population of blacks in Hawaii to be at 0.7 percent)

2 months after getting pregnant, she drops out of college.

3 months after getting pregnant, she marries BHO Sr.

10 months AFTER her first day at the Univ of Hawaii, she gives birth to BHO II at EITHER the Queen's or Kapiolani Medical Center, and immediately LEAVES behind: a) her parents in Honolulu, b) her new husband in Honolulu, and c) her home in Honolulu -- to fly ALONE with a 3-week-old newborn baby 2,800 miles to Seattle to start college at the Univ of Washington

Then ... Stanley Ann Dunham does not return to Hawaii until AFTER BHO Sr left the islands for Harvard, in Fall of 1962.

Even the Obots realize this is an implausible series of events is made even more suspicious in that -NEVER- does Obama Jr in his two books mention that his mom left Hawaii when she was married to BHO Sr, nor does he mention she was EVER in Washington State during their marriage until they were divorced in March 1964 ...

... occam's razor ...
... propensity of evidence ...
... reasonable doubt ...
... trust but verify.

If McCain had won, what do you think Obama and the Dems would have been doing on Wed, Nov. 5th, 2008?


72 posted on 07/17/2009 11:36:26 AM PDT by BP2 (I think, therefore I'm a conservative)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 69 | View Replies]

To: nanetteclaret
That’s why he has to use a teleprompter - so he can keep his stories straight

Very good! I may have to "borrow" that line sometime

73 posted on 07/17/2009 11:43:27 AM PDT by Citizen Soldier (Just got up from Bedroomshire)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 62 | View Replies]

To: BP2

thanks for putting all the ‘61 events in an easily digestable stream that hits the main points. That being said, we need all - or as much as possible - of the stuff we put out there verified, backed up with facts, witnesses or public records, etc. - all to the max extent possible.

it’s a given that ridicule will continue to be a tactic used by the dhimmi lemmings - and the best way to shut them up is with FACTS and TRUTH.

I’m not saying that getting the word out on what your wrote can’t work to sway some folks over to the light - but it’s proven to be easier to associate many of the BC claims/data with the more outlandish ones, or the at least the ones that MSM has successfully branded with ridicule.

Otherwise, we’re just playing right into the hands of these b*^%@rds - and not getting enough of the voting public aware about what’s going on...

JG


74 posted on 07/17/2009 12:03:43 PM PDT by Jacksonian Grouch (God has granted us Freedom; we owe Him our courage in return)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 72 | View Replies]

To: shineon

(How in the world can you get a passport without one?)

He were probably showed the same one that’s on his website. It’s still fooling people even on Free Republic.


75 posted on 07/17/2009 12:24:50 PM PDT by RetSignman (DEMSM: "If you tell a big enough lie, frequently enough, it becomes the truth")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: BP2

Thanks for the summary. What was Washington state that year?


76 posted on 07/17/2009 12:29:25 PM PDT by philled (A government that robs Peter to pay Paul can always depend on the support of Paul.-- GB Shaw)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 72 | View Replies]

To: cycle of discernment

I agree!!!

Excerpt (last sentence)-
“Barack Hussein Obama II [if that is his real name] wasn’t born in the United State.”


77 posted on 07/17/2009 1:12:42 PM PDT by real_patriotic_american
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: allmendream

STOP the smoke screen of hyper-focusing on one stupid, errant comment in a thread of multiple posters to try and discredit the entire discussion.

“Obama was NOT one year old when the birth announcement came out.”

I NEVER CLAIMED THAT HE WAS, DUDE.

I HAVE TOLD YOU NOW REPEATEDLY THAT MANY TIMES IN BLOGS WITH MULTIPLE PEOPLE YOU GET SHADES....NOT ALL THE STUFF IS GOOD__YOU EXTRACT THE CONCRETE STUFF—YOU DO YOUR RESEARCH.

BACK OFF YOU TEDIOUS BOOR.

YOU ARE TRANSPARENT IN TRYING TO CAST DOUBT OVER EVERYTHING IN THAT THREAD BECAUSE OF ONE COMMENT THAT NO OTHER POSTER EVEN PICKED UP ON.

ALL: This guy’s agenda is crystal clear.


78 posted on 07/17/2009 1:42:12 PM PDT by cycle of discernment
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 71 | View Replies]

To: cycle of discernment
Yet you did not “extract the concrete stuff”. You passed on an outright lie and then attacked me for pointing it out.

And nobody wants to “pick up on” the untruths in a birther thread as either they really want to believe the lie, or they will get irrationally attacked for pointing out the truth to those who would apparently rather pass on a lie as if it were even slightly credible.

If I was promoting a position, and included in my “argument” an outright untruth from someone else promoting the same position; and someone pointed it out - I would THANK that person, admit the error, and apologize for passing on an EASILY discernible lie.

But I guess it is easier to just lash out and accuse someone of having an “agenda” for pointing out the truth.

79 posted on 07/17/2009 1:48:20 PM PDT by allmendream ("Wealth is EARNED not distributed, so how could it be redistributed?")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 78 | View Replies]

To: allmendream

zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz


80 posted on 07/17/2009 1:58:24 PM PDT by cycle of discernment
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 79 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100101 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson