Replies

For Obama's Aug. 4, 1961 birth in Honolulu, HA, to be accurate, the following improbable events needed to occur for his COLB to accurate:

1 month after starting classes, Stanley Ann Dunham, Barack’s mom, at age 17, got pregnant by just-about the only black African man on the entire chain of Hawaiian islands (the 1960 Census shows the population of blacks in Hawaii to be at 0.7 percent)

2 months after getting pregnant, she drops out of college.

3 months after getting pregnant, she marries BHO Sr.

10 months AFTER her first day at the Univ of Hawaii, she gives birth to BHO II at EITHER the Queen's or Kapiolani Medical Center, and immediately LEAVES behind: a) her parents in Honolulu, b) her new husband in Honolulu, and c) her home in Honolulu -- to fly ALONE with a 3-week-old newborn baby 2,800 miles to Seattle to start college at the Univ of Washington

Then ... Stanley Ann Dunham does not return to Hawaii until AFTER BHO Sr left the islands for Harvard, in Fall of 1962.

Even the Obots realize this is an implausible series of events is made even more suspicious in that -NEVER- does Obama Jr in his two books mention that his mom left Hawaii when she was married to BHO Sr, nor does he mention she was EVER in Washington State during their marriage until they were divorced in March 1964 ...

... occam's razor ...
... propensity of evidence ...
... reasonable doubt ...
... trust but verify.

If McCain had won, what do you think Obama and the Dems would have been doing on Wed, Nov. 5th, 2008?

thanks for putting all the ‘61 events in an easily digestable stream that hits the main points. That being said, we need all - or as much as possible - of the stuff we put out there verified, backed up with facts, witnesses or public records, etc. - all to the max extent possible.

it’s a given that ridicule will continue to be a tactic used by the dhimmi lemmings - and the best way to shut them up is with FACTS and TRUTH.

I’m not saying that getting the word out on what your wrote can’t work to sway some folks over to the light - but it’s proven to be easier to associate many of the BC claims/data with the more outlandish ones, or the at least the ones that MSM has successfully branded with ridicule.

Otherwise, we’re just playing right into the hands of these b*^%@rds - and not getting enough of the voting public aware about what’s going on...