It appears that Obama will avoid at all cost - the requirement to PROVE his place of birth...
We should all know why, shouldn’t we?
Wow, did they run fast from this one, or what??
So the get-out-of-war card, is a court filing (similar to Cook’s).
That’s amazing. The One’s lawyers sure made quick work of that.
Yes, but what his job now that’s been fired for daring to challenge this fraud in the White House?
It will take lots of courage but who will be the next soldier, airman or sailor to step up to the plate?
There you go...theyhad this planned. And i’d bet the Judge got a call.
So...I guess that’s that?
Looks like about 40,000 troops ordered to war are all going to have to file to get anyone’s attention.
Wonder if survivors of a troop killed would have “standing” to challenge TOTUS authority to order their son to his death. TOTUS cannot rescind a death.
Looks like Taitz claimed victory too soon. She’s delusional and is now doing more harm than good. I haven’t seen one summary of events from her that is based in reality. She continually misrepresents the outcome of every hearing or interaction she has on her cases.
This isn’t going away. Obama has all but admitted guilt by having Cooks deployment revoked and getting him fired. Obama caved.
Can you say USURPER? I thought you could!
Chant...USURPER, USURPER, USURPER
Not being a legal scholar, couldn’t this set a precedent for other members of our military to refuse deployment for the same reason ? It would seem that if enough of them did it, this would eventually end up in the courts ? Or would the military continue to rescind orders to bury this issue ?
Cook’s suit is “moot” in that he already has been told he doesn’t have to go to Afghanistan, ...
what reason do they give?
That 0 was not legitimate so in affect, he was right so he gets his wish to not go?
We're pretty sure the lawsuit was set up for 2 reasons. But, who cares. Kill two birds with one stone.
The reason given and to make 0 produce. 0 didn't produce but Cook got one of his wishes.
AND THIS...
Lynn Samuels, longtime liberal firebrand formerly of WABC radio in New York City and now featured on the "Sirius Left" channel at the satellite radio network.
During Monday's program, Samuels made this surprising case for a cover-up in the Obama birth certificate matter:
The Honolulu hospital which for nearly six months proudly declared President Obama was born at its facility and used that claim as a major fund-raising tool is now engaged in an active cover-up, hiding a White House letter announcing his alleged birth there and refusing to confirm such a letter even exists.
The Kapi'olani Medical Center for Women and Children is electronically cloaking what it had touted as a Jan. 24 letter from the president, in which the commander in chief, just four days after his inauguration, supposedly wrote, "As a beneficiary of the excellence of Kapi'olani Medical Center – the place of my birth – I am pleased to add my voice to your chorus of supporters."
http://www.wnd.com/index.php?fa=PAGE.view&pageId=103633
Well, there you go. Like Lynn said, "he doesn't even know what the hell hospital is was born in". hahaha go Lynn.
video at http://radioequalizer.blogspot.com/2009/07/left-wing-firebrand-lynn-samuels.html
I, too doubt Barry Soetero is a legitimate U.S. citizen. His paternal grandmother claims he was born in Kenya. His maternal grandmother died one day before the election on Nov. 3rd last year. I wonder how many secrets she took to the grave. BTW did not Barry give up his U.S. citzenship (if he ever had it to begin with) when he moved to Indonesia? And of course we all know BHO has yet to produce a legitimate COLB and he refuses to release any of his college transcripts which could shed some light on his citizenship status.
That all said, the framers of our Constitution made it virtually impossible to remove a sitting POTUS. ONLY the Congress as the power and authority to remove a president from office through the process of impeachment. Articles of impeachment must originate and pass by a majority vote in the House. Then the trial goes to the Senate and a minimum of 67 senators must vote to convict and remove the president otherwise he stays.
There is simply no way a Democrat controlled Congress would ever bring forth impeachment proceedings much less a congressional hearing on BHO’s citzenship status IMHO.
The ONLY way stop BHO’s ruinous agenda is to change control of the Congress in 2010. And even then impeachment would still be awfully difficult to pull off given the votes needed required to convict and remove in the Senate, but at least we could stop his ruinous and destructive policy agenda until the next presidential election in 2012.
Right now it makes no difference where BHO was born or what the true nature of his citizenship really is. Fact remains he was elected and he is POTUS and no Court will question this or his elegibility. His own Party in Congress as well as his enablers in the MSM will never challenge his legitimacy, citzenship, or status.
If you want to work on changing all of this, work on replacing his congressional accomplices and enablers in next year’s midterm elections. It’s the ONLY way I know of.
What we need is a taxpayer class action suit over the legality of any tax increase that BO signs into law.
To put it frankly, the soldier's inexperienced lawyer was completely outplayed by the slicker, smarter Obama lawyers.
Still, we must not give up the good fight, and we must continue to do everything legally possible to bring lawsuits that challenge Obama's eligibility to be President of the United States throughout his first term.
That is, we may not get Obama in his first term, but when the 2012 presidential primaries arrive, Obama will see lawsuits that he can't even imagine today, and the community organizer-state senator will not get a free pass this next time, because Obama will be challenged in every state over and over once he signs his name to an application form to run in each state's primary.
Stanley Ann Dunham:
Myself, I think we should turn some of our energies and resources to finding out if Obama's mother was even in Hawaii on Aug. 4, 1961, the day Obama claims he was born in Hawaii.
For instance, we should continue to put heavy pressure on Kapiolani Hospital to tell us whether or not a Stanley Ann Dunham/Obama---or any variation of that name---was a patient at the hospital on Aug. 4, 1961, the day that Obama claims that he was born in Hawaii.
1.I say this: Let us move our focus away from Obama---the Obama camp loves it when we focus on Obama, because they know that Obama can hide behind the tight medical privacy laws---and put our focus and energy on finding out if Stanley Ann Dunham, Obama's mother, was a patient at Kapiolani hospital on Aug.4, 1961, the day Obama claims that he was born in Hawaii.
2.I say the above because I believe that the Obama camp knows that Obama and Kapiolani hospital are on shaky ground when they argue that Obama has the legal right to stop the public from finding out if Stanley Ann Dunham, who died many years ago, was or was not a patient at Kapiolani hospital on Aug. 4, 1961.
3. Myself, I don't understand what legal power President Obama as a private citizen has to stop Kapiolani Hospital from officially telling the public whether or not Stanley Ann Dunham or any variation of that name was a patient at the hospital on Aug. 4, 1961.
4.Remember, we are NOT asking to see Stanley Ann Dunham's detailed hospital records.
5. Rather, we are simply asking if she was a patient on the date of Aug. 4, 1961, the day Obama claims that he was born in Hawaii.
6.Finally, I wish some bright, never-give-up lawyer or lawyers would challenge Kapiolani hospital officials when the hospital officials argue that they are restrained by medical privacy laws from even admitting that Stanley Ann Dunham was or was not a patient there way back on Aug.4, 1961, nearly 50 years ago for pete's sake.
The author deliberately intends to mislead in this first sentence.
Who didn’t see this coming? DoD cancels his orders to go to Afghan, then orders his employer to fire him. Case gone, job, too.