Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Prole

Nope.

The Army, upon receiving the restraining order, couldn’t wait to pull the Major’s heart out through his rectum.

This is a slam dunk case for the Army’s lawyer - satisfy the Major’s requirement that the order’s came from a legitimate NCA, and then decide whether to put the Major on a plane, or in the brig.

Army’s lawyer calls the Pentagon’s liason to the WH, and requests that BHO provide his birth certificate. Fax it, scan it, messenger a notorized copy from HI to the Army base in HI, and set up a conference call with that base’s legal officer, and the case is over. Four hours total, two days tops, to clear this thing and then ensure that the Major retires a Major, or perhaps something lower.

Army’s lawyer gets the following in response:

Rescind the order.

Army’s lawyer is probably speechless, wondering what to say to something like that, because the ramifications of that are nothing less than:

“If I just heard the WH correctly, no officer holding a commission will be expected to follow any order by force of UCMJ, because if they won’t prosecute the Major, and respond instead to rescinding his order, then it means any officer who pulls this stunt can expect the same treatment.”

Now the Army lawyer is starting to feel a bit dizzy, knowing that there are ballistic missile submarines and missile silos - all commanded by officers - who will now either follow or not follow their orders - anybody’s guess on whether they will or won’t, because if they don’t on these grounds, they Pentagon will RESCIND the order.

All of this to say the following chilling thing:

There is no longer legitimate National Command Authority in the United States of America. If you refuse to follow a direct order, on the grounds of that order coming from an illegal CINC, then you go away scot free: order rescinded.

As of today, we now have a Constitutional crisis.


189 posted on 07/15/2009 1:05:11 AM PDT by RinaseaofDs
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 187 | View Replies ]


To: RinaseaofDs
Excellent summation, and I appreciate your perspective in all of this.

This definitely bears repeating:

"If I just heard the WH correctly, no officer holding a commission will be expected to follow any order by force of UCMJ, because if they won’t prosecute the Major, and respond instead to rescinding his order, then it means any officer who pulls this stunt can expect the same treatment.”

In short, officers will not be punished by the UCMJ if they question the Constitutional authority of Obama's right to hold office.

Come on, Patriots in the military!

STAND UP AND QUESTION OBAMA'S UNCONSTITUTIONAL STRANGLEHOLD ON THE PRESIDENCY!

CHALLENGE AND DEFY THEM!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!


191 posted on 07/15/2009 1:14:42 AM PDT by Prole (Please pray for the families of Chris and Channon. May God always watch over them.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 189 | View Replies ]

To: RinaseaofDs
PS...

With the crisis in place, what do you predict will happen next?

192 posted on 07/15/2009 1:25:54 AM PDT by Prole (Please pray for the families of Chris and Channon. May God always watch over them.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 189 | View Replies ]

To: RinaseaofDs

Brilliant analysis.


196 posted on 07/15/2009 3:26:26 AM PDT by 2ndDivisionVet (I am Jim Thompson!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 189 | View Replies ]

To: RinaseaofDs; LucyT; Jet Jaguar

Fascinating. Thanks for your post.

What do you suppose is going on behind closed doors? Are Army lawyers taking this as seriously as they should? How can this be effectively buried without other officers beginning to ask qestions- not just about the legitimacy of the CINC -but about the application of the UCMJ?

This is unsettling as hell.


199 posted on 07/15/2009 3:40:48 AM PDT by SE Mom (Proud mom of an Iraq war combat vet)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 189 | View Replies ]

To: RinaseaofDs

Funny, one would never know it. The media is out to lunch, including Fox.


200 posted on 07/15/2009 3:43:45 AM PDT by dforest (Who is the real Jim Thompson? I am.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 189 | View Replies ]

To: RinaseaofDs

Wow!

Although the mainstream media is refusing to publish this, I bet Maj. Cook’s case is sweeping through the military like **wildfire**!


208 posted on 07/15/2009 6:39:17 AM PDT by wintertime (People are not stupid! Good ideas win!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 189 | View Replies ]

To: RinaseaofDs

AMEN! Well said dialog. Finally, SOMEONE GETS IT!


235 posted on 07/15/2009 9:46:56 AM PDT by conservativegramma ((No taxation without constitutional representation!))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 189 | View Replies ]

To: RinaseaofDs

That was 100% my read on this.

Frankly it scares the bejesus out of me.


244 posted on 07/15/2009 10:04:40 AM PDT by Danae (Conservative does not equal Republican. Conservative does not compromise.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 189 | View Replies ]

To: RinaseaofDs

Yep, sounds about right, the way you’re reading it.

Save for the date-time stamp on the beginning of The Crisis -

that would be 04 November 2008.

JG


268 posted on 07/15/2009 12:36:07 PM PDT by Jacksonian Grouch (God has granted us Freedom; we owe Him our courage in return)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 189 | View Replies ]

To: RinaseaofDs
"As of today, we now have a Constitutional crisis."

As of January 20, 2009 we've had a constitutional crisis.

284 posted on 07/15/2009 1:46:44 PM PDT by editor-surveyor (The beginning of the O'Bummer administration looks a lot like the end of the Nixon administration)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 189 | View Replies ]

To: RinaseaofDs

Nope.

The Army, upon receiving the restraining order, couldn’t wait to pull the Major’s heart out through his rectum.

This is a slam dunk case for the Army’s lawyer - satisfy the Major’s requirement that the order’s came from a legitimate NCA, and then decide whether to put the Major on a plane, or in the brig.

Army’s lawyer calls the Pentagon’s liason to the WH, and requests that BHO provide his birth certificate. Fax it, scan it, messenger a notorized copy from HI to the Army base in HI, and set up a conference call with that base’s legal officer, and the case is over. Four hours total, two days tops, to clear this thing and then ensure that the Major retires a Major, or perhaps something lower.

Army’s lawyer gets the following in response:

Rescind the order.

Army’s lawyer is probably speechless, wondering what to say to something like that, because the ramifications of that are nothing less than:

“If I just heard the WH correctly, no officer holding a commission will be expected to follow any order by force of UCMJ, because if they won’t prosecute the Major, and respond instead to rescinding his order, then it means any officer who pulls this stunt can expect the same treatment.”

Now the Army lawyer is starting to feel a bit dizzy, knowing that there are ballistic missile submarines and missile silos - all commanded by officers - who will now either follow or not follow their orders - anybody’s guess on whether they will or won’t, because if they don’t on these grounds, they Pentagon will RESCIND the order.

All of this to say the following chilling thing:

There is no longer legitimate National Command Authority in the United States of America. If you refuse to follow a direct order, on the grounds of that order coming from an illegal CINC, then you go away scot free: order rescinded.

As of today, we now have a Constitutional crisis.
_______________________________________________

worth reapeating...YIKES!!!!


285 posted on 07/15/2009 1:49:52 PM PDT by SaraJohnson
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 189 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson