Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Palin Says Alaska Needs New Ethics Policy (FoxNews.com)
FoxNews.com ^ | 7/10/2009

Posted on 07/11/2009 5:46:21 PM PDT by SonOfDarkSkies

Alaska Gov. Sarah Palin says she hopes the latest ethics complaint filed against her is a "wake-up call" that a new ethics policy is needed in the state.

"The only saving grace in this recent episode is that it proves beyond any doubt the significance of the problem Alaska faces in the 'new normal' of political discourse," Palin said in a release that was posted online through her Twitter account.

"I hope this will be a wake-up call -- to legislators, to commentators and to citizens generally -- that we need a much more civil and respectful dialogue that focuses on the best interests of the state, rather than the petty resentments of a few," Palin said.

The ethics complaint, filed Friday with the state personnel board, alleges that Palin has been paid for media interviews. Palin's chief of staff, Mike Nizich, called the allegation absurd.

(Excerpt) Read more at foxnews.com ...


TOPICS: News/Current Events; US: Alaska
KEYWORDS:
The Dems are using Alinsky's rules on Sarah. And Obama says "Thank you, Satan"!
1 posted on 07/11/2009 5:46:22 PM PDT by SonOfDarkSkies
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: SonOfDarkSkies
The ethics complaint, filed Friday with the state personnel board, alleges that Palin has been paid for media interviews. Palin's chief of staff, Mike Nizich, called the allegation absurd.


2 posted on 07/11/2009 5:49:05 PM PDT by jessduntno (NEVER say Cap and Trade Bill. It's the Electricity, Heating Oil and Gasoline Tax Bill....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SonOfDarkSkies

The Fuhrer, his Gestapo and the US Congress desperately need Ethics Rules. These henchmen, however, obey no rules even God’s.


3 posted on 07/11/2009 5:53:30 PM PDT by ExTexasRedhead
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jessduntno
When their are too many sewer rats on board things like this happens!

Over board


4 posted on 07/11/2009 5:56:11 PM PDT by restornu (Dream Impossible Dreams)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: SonOfDarkSkies

Looks like Alinsky’s rules are gonna be used here on FreeRepublic as well starting Monday with David Shuster, we all gotta be prepared. These far left whack jobs will stop at no end to destroy this country


5 posted on 07/11/2009 5:58:33 PM PDT by Sarah Barracuda
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SonOfDarkSkies

I thought Palin was proud of the new ‘ethics reform’ that was passed and she praised... It must not have been all it was cracked up to be.


6 posted on 07/11/2009 6:05:21 PM PDT by deport
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sarah Barracuda
We needs some "in the light" rules of our own to fight "Alinsky's "Rules for Radical" ("Thank you Lucifer" says Saul).

Alinsky's rules are rules of the Chicago style thugs and cheaters.

Surely God has rules that can defeat those of Alinsky!

Let's think this through!

7 posted on 07/11/2009 6:05:33 PM PDT by SonOfDarkSkies (Obama: "Enough about me, let's talk about you...what do you think of me?")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: deport

Thats cos she didnt think they would be abused


8 posted on 07/11/2009 6:23:54 PM PDT by Vanders9
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: SonOfDarkSkies

Just keep in mind one fact: Alinsky knew how to fight, granted. But something he never had an opportunity to learn was how to WIN. They think they are winning, but all they are doing is strengthening our resolve. To the ramparts!


9 posted on 07/11/2009 6:30:54 PM PDT by redhead (Liberalism: The STD of American politics. Check out the Half-baked Sourdough! (shameless blog plug!))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: redhead
Hoo-aaah!

Let's kick some lib fanny!;-)

10 posted on 07/11/2009 6:33:03 PM PDT by SonOfDarkSkies (Obama: "Enough about me, let's talk about you...what do you think of me?")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: deport
The biggest problem with Alaska's executive ethics law just left town. Watch how quick the Legislature can fix the frivolous problem when a new Governor gets on board.
11 posted on 07/11/2009 6:40:22 PM PDT by Swampmarine
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Vanders9

Thats cos she didnt think they would be abused


Yep, I agree she didn’t think.


12 posted on 07/11/2009 6:47:50 PM PDT by deport
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: deport
Sara was very proud of the new ethics law - look at google entries about it.

That was the theme right up to the point her political enemies - and she has many inside and outside of the state found out the new ethic law could be used to club her senseless.

Or, out of office....

13 posted on 07/11/2009 7:58:53 PM PDT by ASOC (Who is that fat lady? And why is she singing???)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: ASOC

Yep those ethic laws can be used by anyone taking the time to file the papers. Just look at Tom DeLay and his run in with Ronnie Earle regarding ethic complaints.

My point is Palin was bragging about what an improvement they had. Apparently the improvements were minimual at best and sounds like they left the barn door open.


14 posted on 07/11/2009 8:37:51 PM PDT by deport
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: deport; ASOC

So, what would you two astute gentlemen do to make the ethics laws better and correct this problem?


15 posted on 07/11/2009 10:04:42 PM PDT by SoConPubbie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: SoConPubbie
Place both Legislative Ethics and Executive Ethics under the Judicial Branch appointed by the Chief Justice. Most Chief Justice's have out served the Governor that appointed them. A complaint must be filed in person and require a small deposit for a complaint that is returned if it advances to the hearing stage. In Alaska, complaints against judges are referred to the Judicial Conduct Commission appointed by the executive brance (Governor)
16 posted on 07/11/2009 10:53:02 PM PDT by Swampmarine
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Swampmarine
Correction: In Alaska we have the Alaska Judicial Council of 7 with 3 members appointed by the Governor and confirmed by the Legislature. Another three appointed by the AK Bar Association and the last the Chief Justice. They recommend new judges to the Governor for appointment. All judges in Alaska are Governor appointed. The Commission on Judicial Conduct is made up of judges and practicing attorneys. They handle complaints against judges and appear to be making it very hard on their website to find out how they get appointed to their positions. If I can't find it, I'm now thinking it is not the Governor.
Too much information but one last thing, when a comlaintant says they can't afford a small filing fee, tell them to come back when they have enough of a life to get the money.
17 posted on 07/11/2009 11:43:41 PM PDT by Swampmarine
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: SoConPubbie

The first step should be a citizens panel to do the first thru - sort of like a grand jusy. They could meet via teleconference of on a moderated web site.

The panel would exam the ‘proof’ of the complaint. Likwe an obudsman, they would have priority access to state records and employees.

Once ‘vetted’ a formal investigation can proceed.

This simple process could have screened the BS complaints vs one more serious one (IE Troopergate)

The panel would be seated for a year, the members paid a stipend based on hours in actuall attendance. Think part -time job.

Panelist would be chosen by the same means as a grand jury.

Will work - dunno - nobody has tried it yet. BUt for a small state like Alaska, that has good connectivity, it could work.

You asked - here is my take.

Have fun


18 posted on 07/12/2009 12:11:48 AM PDT by ASOC (Who is that fat lady? And why is she singing???)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: SoConPubbie
What to do I don't know. But there must be more to it than doing a few things and then claiming a great improvement which obviously wasn't the case.

One thing maybe to use a process whereby complaints have to be vetted by some group before getting it to the full investigative stage. This group would have to be independent and non partisan if that is possible at all. This maybe a group of citizens or possible a mix of legislators/citizens.

I know that it is claimed a prosecutor can indict a ham sandwich via the grand jury route so I really don't have a good answer. Politics is a just what it is, politics. Often vengeful, partisan and with disregard for what is the best for the state and citizenry.

19 posted on 07/12/2009 7:09:05 AM PDT by deport
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson