I believe the establishment insiders are against Palin. I will say that when I took her to task for what she did last Friday, I thought it would cost her a lot of support. I’ll be honest though, it was my contention that it would cost her Independent and Democrat support down the road in the future.
It wasn’t my contention that she would lose support from well placed Republican and supposedly Conservative office holders and operatives.
I agree with your comments regarding the Washington establishment. It’s evident to me that the beltway ‘moderatism’ goes far beyond anything we imagined. Now they’re willing to adopt the Democrat’s talking points even when it comes to some of our bright developing stars.
That’s nothing but suicidal, unless her destruction wouldn’t hurt your cause. So what is their cause, if not consummate leftist policy? Game over! The gig is up.
Yesterday I posted what I thought was an interesting point comparing Presidential elections in the U.S. to the elections in the U.S.S.R. Yes, the Soviet citizens did get to vote. They just voted for one of two people within the same party.
Well, guess what. What are we doing if not the same exact thing?
Can anyone tell me that the election in 2008 was anything other than voting for one of two people running from the same party?
Our Presidential elections are meaningless. We are no better off than the people in the U.S.S.R. were.
The Republican party has so defiled it’s early primaries, that you couldn’t get a Conservative elected. And so it goes.
Our media has become Pravda. Our Presidential elections have adopted the U.S.S.R. model. One could argue that ACORN is akin to the activist body of the Politburo too.
Gooed Morninske Amerikans...
“Can anyone tell me that the election in 2008 was anything other than voting for one of two people running from the same party?”
I was with ya until that line. Obama is not a Democrat. No. And John Mccain is a lot of things, but he is not an avowed Marxist.
Thanks for your comments and keep your powder dry FRiend.